No, not in 1991. That was Haney's best conditioning and Dorian was not at his best in terms of conditioning in 1992.
I could care less what year was Haney's or Dorian's best/ worst conditioning. I don't understand why you keep bringing that up. What matters is Dorian, although not at his best, still had better conditioning than Haney. Check the videos. His entire back, midsection, glutes, and hamstrings were all more defined.
First of all, Haney does not have inferior conditoning, not in 1991. He also didn't have inferior proportions than Dorian's. Both have weak point sin terms of proportion. Second of all, going by your logic, then Jean-Pierre Fux should ahve defeated Dorian since he had superior size and symmetry but inferior conditoning.
yes, Haney had worse conditioning than Dorian in 91. He also had inferior proportions. As for your last point, you're neglecting the total package. It would be like me saying "going by your logic, Andreas Munzer should have won every contest b/c he had superior conditioning."