You would think someone who is arguing so confidently would actually be informed on the subject.
Of course he gave it his all, and that including overdoing it due to being obsessed with conditioning. Yates' own words were that he knows he overdid it and overdieted to hit condition, and could have come in heavier without sacrificing it. He has said this on multiple occasions. Meaning, even in his most dominant wins, he could have been better.
Regardless, he was still heavier than 98/99 Ronnie, with equal condition.
Its funny. When someone doesn't like my response, They say Im 'arguing' as if it doesn't take two to argue.
Im aware of the facts. Whether he could've competed at a higher weight but over dieted or he couldn't hold his size to achieve the condition he wanted, the end result is the same: he didn't step on stage at that size.
Both of them had ugly, huge, muscular ripped physiques. This isn't a battle of aesthetics. And Ronnie was bigger. He was better at Dorian's own game. And if pressed Id say Ronnie had better aesthetics to boot.
Im not 'confident' I just haven't heard a compelling counter point. Im not an ifbb judge and they've never been on stage at the same time while at their respective all time best.
In my own personal opinion NO ONE beats 03 Ronnie. Its not specific to Dorian. Though Dorian comes the closest. But not Arnold, Not Sergio, Not Haney, Not Heath and no one since then either. Ronnie 03 is the GOAT. I haven't seen anything to make me change my mind. Least of all some hypothetical "we'll Dorian could've came in at 285 and ripped."