Covid-19 - WAKE THE FUCK UP SHEEP LIKE PEOPLE - Discussion

[chaos]

Hey Matt.

Because I’m not posting about COVID anymore I have a math question for you.

3 people on a room. Each person has to pick a number between zero an infinity. The winner is the person who picks the middle number.

What is your strategy.


🙂

Do you lift weights or are you like shizzo?

[OAK]

Do you lift weights or are you like shizzo?

That’s interesting.

I didn’t know your name was MATT.

🙄🙄🙄🙄

[chaos]

That’s interesting.

I didn’t know your name was MATT.

🙄🙄🙄🙄

From this point forward, will be known as shizzoak.

 

[OAK]

From this point forward, will be known as shizzoak.

 

So what’s the answer to the question I just posted?

Matt is stumped.

😎😎👍

[Matt]

Hey Matt.

Because I’m not posting about COVID anymore I have a math question for you.

3 people on a room. Each person has to pick a number between zero an infinity. The winner is the person who picks the middle number.

What is your strategy.


🙂

Don't pick zero, and don't pick infinity. That would be a guaranteed automatic loss, or at the best, a tie.

Beyond that, it depends on if you have any information on how the other people will vote.

If I pick 75,000, and the other two people pick numbers in the tens of millions, one of them would win.

If the other two pick numbers in the thousands, one of them would win.

Not much strategy there.

I would think people would go with big numbers.

I also don't think people know would "quadrillions" are, but most people know what trillions are.

I think a trillion might be a good guess.

Someone would probably pick over, and someone under.
Maybe.

Based on people's average understanding of mathematics...that's quite possible.

But really, there's no way to win here.

We should do this test now, and PM chaos or OneMoreRape, to see who wins.

Or is this a trick question, and you are asking about the theoretical "middle" between 0 and infinity?

Because that's a different question.

Are you asking about the midpoint between 0 and infinity?

Or are you asking about three people randomly picking any large numbers, and strategizing how to be the middle guesser? There is no surefire way to do this, by the way.

[Matt]

Hey Matt.

Because I’m not posting about COVID anymore I have a math question for you.

3 people on a room. Each person has to pick a number between zero an infinity. The winner is the person who picks the middle number.

What is your strategy.


🙂

Are your typos intentional, and the answer is 3?

[OAK]

Don't pick zero, and don't pick infinity. That would be a guaranteed automatic loss, or at the best, a tie.

Beyond that, it depends on if you have any information on how the other people will vote.

If I pick 75,000, and the other two people pick numbers in the tens of millions, one of them would win.

If the other two pick numbers in the thousands, one of them would win.

Not much strategy there.

I would think people would go with big numbers.

I also don't think people know would "quadrillions" are, but most people know what trillions are.

I think a trillion might be a good guess.

Someone would probably pick over, and someone under.
Maybe.

Based on people's average understanding of mathematics...that's quite possible.

But really, there's no way to win here.

We should do this test now, and PM chaos or OneMoreRape, to see who wins.

Or is this a trick question, and you are asking about the theoretical "middle" between 0 and infinity?

Because that's a different question.

Are you asking about the midpoint between 0 and infinity?

Or are you asking about three people randomly picking any large numbers, and strategizing how to be the middle guesser? There is no surefire way to do this, by the way.

Awesome response Matt.

You are right. No correct answer.

Typos…let’s just leave those alone?

😉

[Matt]

Awesome response Matt.

You are right. No correct answer.

Typos…let’s just leave those alone?

😉

Ah. I thought it was one of those trick questions, based on how it was worded.

However, if you picked infinity or zero, you would lose for sure.

If you pick one, you could only win if someone else picks zero, which is a bad strategy.

So there are at least a couple of things that you could NOT DO.

Not much you can do.

Just like getting to "Covid Zero".

I'm going to go on record:

This can't happen, unless better vaccines are created. You know...vaccines that stop infection and spread [novel idea, I know].

We've wrecked a lot of economic havoc over achieving something impossible.

[OAK]

Ah. I thought it was one of those trick questions, based on how it was worded.

However, if you picked infinity or zero, you would lose for sure.

If you pick one, you could only win if someone else picks zero, which is a bad strategy.

So there are at least a couple of things that you could NOT DO.

Not much you can do.

Just like getting to "Covid Zero".

I'm going to go on record:

This can't happen, unless better vaccines are created. You know...vaccines that stop infection and spread [novel idea, I know].

We've wrecked a lot of economic havoc over achieving something impossible.

Just wanted to check your math skills.

I liked your response.

Of course COVID is out of bounds for me (don’t want to get banned).

😎

[The Scott]

Just wanted to check your math skills.

I liked your response.

Of course COVID is out of bounds for me (don’t want to get banned).

😎

Fuck off cuntlette.

[Never1AShow]

.

[Matt]

Just wanted to check your math skills.

I liked your response.

Of course COVID is out of bounds for me (don’t want to get banned).

😎

Hm.

I should ask OneMoreRape to review this thread.

Personally, I would like to see it grow to 100+ pages.

Big thanks to illuminati for starting this thread!

[illuminati]

Fuck off cuntlette.

Excellent reply & as Succinct & Eloquent as usual. 

[illuminati]

Another point, Hulkster [dumb shit]:

Canada has had 32,775 deaths so far, since the start of the pandemic arriving in Canada, by way of its first case on 2020-01-25 through to 2022-01-28 [almost exactly two years - see below].

Canada has 38,436,447 people.

Do the math:

32,775 ÷ (38,436,447÷100,000)

That's 85.27 deaths per average 100,000 population.

As you can CLEARLY SEE FROM THE UPDATED PUBLIC HEALTH AGENCY OF CANADA DATA BELOW:

26,945 of 32,775 of those deaths are people aged 70+.

That's 82.2%, Hulkster.

Now, update the math for Canada's population with that percentage:

85.27 x 0.82.2

^ Deaths per 100K x Percent of Deaths Aged 70+.

= 70.10.

Therefore, ON AVERAGE, IN ALL OF CANADA, SINCE THE PANDEMIC START:

Only 15.17 [85.27 minus 70.10] people UNDER AGE 70 per 100,000 Canadians have to died so far.

If you actually BOTHERED to read the mortality data [below] or even BELIEVE WHAT YOU'RE SEEING [or not seeing] with your own eyes, you would actually figure that out by now.

Dumb shit - and you have the audacity to call us conspiracy theorists? Fucking idiot - you've been wearing a mask for two years now for a virus that YOU DON'T EVEN HAVE [which means you're not "protecting others" by wearing a mask, since you're not infected], and that poses zero threat to you?

And you call us conspiracy theorists? LMAO. That's a laugh.

You're making some Excellent points Matt & Running rings around J.oak/ prime/ bulkster etc
They're completely stumped & unable to Rationally answer or explain.

I'd like to see them Explain away the different types of face Mask & the use of A bit of Cloth
paper for the Worlds deadliest Virus - Pathetic Brain washed /Dead Moronic Fuckers.

[Matt]

You're making some Excellent points Matt & Running rings around J.oak/ prime/ bulkster etc
They're completely stumped & unable to Rationally answer or explain.

I'd like to see them Explain away the different types of face Mask & the use of A bit of Cloth
paper for the Worlds deadliest Virus - Pathetic Brain washed /Dead Moronic Fuckers.

The funny thing to me is that idiot Hulkster thought it was shocking that only 74 people in Thunder Bay died, only 13 of whom were under age 70, and only 3 of that 13 had no health conditions - in a city of 107,909.

Meanwhile, the CANADIAN AVERAGE number of deaths for this pandemic so far for a population of 100,000 is 85 deaths, 15 of whom being under age 70.

That's in OVER TWO YEARS.

As for Hulkster being shocked that 10 of 13 had underlying disease - once again, the Thunder Bay numbers are extremely close to the Canadian average.

It's just proof that Hulkster is shocked at what he actually subscribed to!

Yet the most recently updated mortality data from the Public Health Agency of Canada shows Thunder Bay is no different than any city:

32,775 deaths per 38,436,447 Canadian population
= 85 deaths per 100,000, on average
^ THIS IS A SIMPLE RATIO THAT IDIOT HULKSTER DOESN'T GRASP:

32775/38,436,447 = 85/100,000
^ PUT IT IN A CALCULATOR AND VERIFY YOURSELF, HULKSTER.

As for how I knew about the comorbidities in my city - well, given that NO ONE IS DYING OF THIS VIRUS, it's not that hard for me to track deaths individually via Facebook, to find friends and family who tell me the specific details.

There have only been 13 PEOPLE UNDER AGE 70 who have died here.

Again, that's not hard to track.

And 10 of those 13 had comorbidities.

So only three people who were both under age 70 and without health conditions had died so far, in a city of ~108K.

Canadian average is probably closer to five per 100K population.

Real scary plague here. 

[deadz]

The funny thing to me is that idiot Hulkster thought it was shocking that only 74 people in Thunder Bay died, only 13 of whom were under age 70, and only 3 of that 13 had no health conditions - in a city of 107,909.

Meanwhile, the CANADIAN AVERAGE number of deaths for this pandemic so far for a population of 100,000 is 85 deaths, 15 of whom being under age 70.

That's in OVER TWO YEARS.

As for Hulkster being shocked that 10 of 13 had underlying disease - once again, the Thunder Bay numbers are extremely close to the Canadian average.

It's just proof that Hulkster is shocked at what he actually subscribed to!

Yet the most recently updated mortality data from the Public Health Agency of Canada shows Thunder Bay is no different than any city:

32,775 deaths per 38,436,447 Canadian population
= 85 deaths per 100,000, on average
^ THIS IS A SIMPLE RATIO THAT IDIOT HULKSTER DOESN'T GRASP:

32775/38,436,447 = 85/100,000
^ PUT IT IN A CALCULATOR AND VERIFY YOURSELF, HULKSTER.

As for how I knew about the comorbidities in my city - well, given that NO ONE IS DYING OF THIS VIRUS, it's not that hard for me to track deaths individually via Facebook, to find friends and family who tell me the specific details.

There have only been 13 PEOPLE UNDER AGE 70 who have died here.

Again, that's not hard to track.

And 10 of those 13 had comorbidities.

So only three people who were both under age 70 and without health conditions had died so far, in a city of ~108K.

Canadian average is probably closer to five per 100K population.

Real scary plague here. 

Really, who cares already. It’s a cold the end. Participating in the stupidity just makes you stupid.

[Matt]

Really, who cares already. It’s a cold the end. Participating in the stupidity just makes you stupid.

It's just sad to me that this stuff is continuing.

Places like Sweden and Texas are moving on with business as usual, and meanwhile in Ontario, gyms JUST reopened today:

https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/mobile/hopefully-this-is-the-last-time-ontario-businesses-reopen-with-cautious-optimism-1.5761034

[Matt]

Can I encourage everyone to post photos here?

Below are the instructions on how to upload photos.

[Matt]

And here is how to post a photo from a URL that links directly to the photo:

[*img]http://WEBSITE LINK/URL TO PHOTO GOES HERE.[/*img]

[tommywishbone]

Covid. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHA!

[Theoak*]

The funny thing to me is that idiot Hulkster thought it was shocking that only 74 people in Thunder Bay died, only 13 of whom were under age 70, and only 3 of that 13 had no health conditions - in a city of 107,909.

Meanwhile, the CANADIAN AVERAGE number of deaths for this pandemic so far for a population of 100,000 is 85 deaths, 15 of whom being under age 70.

That's in OVER TWO YEARS.

As for Hulkster being shocked that 10 of 13 had underlying disease - once again, the Thunder Bay numbers are extremely close to the Canadian average.

It's just proof that Hulkster is shocked at what he actually subscribed to!

Yet the most recently updated mortality data from the Public Health Agency of Canada shows Thunder Bay is no different than any city:

32,775 deaths per 38,436,447 Canadian population
= 85 deaths per 100,000, on average
^ THIS IS A SIMPLE RATIO THAT IDIOT HULKSTER DOESN'T GRASP:

32775/38,436,447 = 85/100,000
^ PUT IT IN A CALCULATOR AND VERIFY YOURSELF, HULKSTER.

As for how I knew about the comorbidities in my city - well, given that NO ONE IS DYING OF THIS VIRUS, it's not that hard for me to track deaths individually via Facebook, to find friends and family who tell me the specific details.

There have only been 13 PEOPLE UNDER AGE 70 who have died here.

Again, that's not hard to track.

And 10 of those 13 had comorbidities.

So only three people who were both under age 70 and without health conditions had died so far, in a city of ~108K.

Canadian average is probably closer to five per 100K population.

Real scary plague here. 

The Pfizer vaccine 2 dose regime is 50% effective against the delta strain and wanes. It's completely useless against omnicron.

It was only ever 95% effective against the Wuhan strain 2 weeks after second jab, it's been downhill since that nadir for the experimental gene therapies that have never been used for vaccinations previously

In the general population about 1 in 20,000 is dying from vaccine injury per dose, so a 2 dose regime puts you at 1 in 10,000 risk of death, thus 100 people in a million are dying from mRNA jabs

Yhe most dangerous vax produced previously was for smallpox which killed 2 in a million so these mRNA jabs are 50 times more dangerous than the previously most dangerous jabs

Lethality from covid is about 1 in 1000 for people over 60 and co-morbidities (of which obesity is the major one) vit. D and zinc deficiencies are also major compounding factors ... this is a 99.8% survival rate.

Lethality from covid is about 1 in 10,000 for people under 50 ... 99.9% survival rate with current treatments (monoclonal antibodies, zinc, dexamethadone)

[Gym-Rat]

The Pfizer vaccine 2 dose regime is 50% effective against the delta strain and wanes. It's completely useless against omnicron.

It was only ever 95% effective against the Wuhan strain 2 weeks after second jab, it's been downhill since that nadir for the experimental gene therapies that have never been used for vaccinations previously

In the general population about 1 in 20,000 is dying from vaccine injury per dose, so a 2 dose regime puts you at 1 in 10,000 risk of death, thus 100 people in a million are dying from mRNA jabs

Yhe most dangerous vax produced previously was for smallpox which killed 2 in a million so these mRNA jabs are 50 times more dangerous than the previously most dangerous jabs

Lethality from covid is about 1 in 1000 for people over 60 and co-morbidities (of which obesity is the major one) vit. D and zinc deficiencies are also major compounding factors ... this is a 99.8% survival rate.

Lethality from covid is about 1 in 10,000 for people under 50 ... 99.9% survival rate with current treatments (monoclonal antibodies, zinc, dexamethadone)

stop making sense sir, youre sending the woke-dems of getbig into a tizzy-fit

[Matt]

The Pfizer vaccine 2 dose regime is 50% effective against the delta strain and wanes. It's completely useless against omnicron.

It was only ever 95% effective against the Wuhan strain 2 weeks after second jab, it's been downhill since that nadir for the experimental gene therapies that have never been used for vaccinations previously

In the general population about 1 in 20,000 is dying from vaccine injury per dose, so a 2 dose regime puts you at 1 in 10,000 risk of death, thus 100 people in a million are dying from mRNA jabs

Yhe most dangerous vax produced previously was for smallpox which killed 2 in a million so these mRNA jabs are 50 times more dangerous than the previously most dangerous jabs

Lethality from covid is about 1 in 1000 for people over 60 and co-morbidities (of which obesity is the major one) vit. D and zinc deficiencies are also major compounding factors ... this is a 99.8% survival rate.

Lethality from covid is about 1 in 10,000 for people under 50 ... 99.9% survival rate with current treatments (monoclonal antibodies, zinc, dexamethadone)

Fantastic post.

I'm struggling to cope with the fact this madness is still continuing for a virus with such a high survival rate TWO YEARS IN.

At first, with those images from China of people being welded into their apartments - fine.

But people haven't figured out this is a sham yet?

WTF is up with that?

[Matt]

This is from the Trucker Convoy thread...but I'd be curious to hear anyone's thoughts on these posts, here in this thread:

Some of these people really want their new world order ie tri yearly injections, masks, endless lockdowns, social isolation and psychological abuse.

I just can't for the life of me understand why? Things were pretty damn good the way they were before now that I look back. What would possibly make someone think that this way of life is better...? I'm completely behooved on this one 

This is what’s causing me the most psychological damage.

Trying to compute why so many want their freedoms taken away.

It’s like a nightmare, to consider how a percentage of our species desires to be subjugated.

^ This has been what I have been experiencing.

I'd love to find a resolution...it's just that these people are willing to call 9-1-1 on me for breathing air, and the police are responding to these calls.

[Hulkster]

In the general population about 1 in 20,000 is dying from vaccine injury per dose,

source for this stat?
 
it is much much much higher than what I'm seeing:

https://covid-101.org/science/how-many-people-have-died-from-the-vaccine-in-the-u-s/

3 vaccine deaths out of Over 339 million vaccine doses were given to 187.2 million people in the US as of July 19, 2021.

did you pull that stat out of your ass?