Author Topic: Post pics where another bodybuilder actually looks better than Ronnie (Read 31598 times)

Thin Lizzy · « **Reply #75 on:** April 24, 2006, 11:24:28 PM »

I'm sorry, but Dorian simply did not know how to hit a rear double bi. He needed to take a deep breath and arch his back. In his version, he always looks hunchbacked and scrunched up at the shoulders.

Now the guy who just came in 8th at the master's O knows how to hit the pose. So does Chick for that matter.

Thin Lizzy · « **Reply #76 on:** April 24, 2006, 11:38:16 PM »

225 Ronnie vs. I'm guessing about a 225 MM.

Hulkster · « **Reply #77 on:** April 24, 2006, 11:41:46 PM »

personally, I think at 225 pounds, Ronnie looks weird - his frame does not look good with that amount of muscle - his arms overpower his chest.

He needed to be around 245 or so to fill out (eg. 98 Olympia etc)

pumpster · « **Reply #78 on:** April 25, 2006, 05:11:09 AM »

Remind me again why they have to be compared at about the same weight?

Irrelevant; comparisons in shape are what matters.

onlyme · « **Reply #79 on:** April 25, 2006, 05:49:31 AM »

Blows Ronnie away

pumpster · « **Reply #80 on:** April 25, 2006, 06:19:51 AM »

Great shot. Not better than Ron in shape though.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #81 on:** April 25, 2006, 04:12:11 PM »

I would say Rhul looks the better of the 2 in this pic.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #82 on:** April 25, 2006, 04:13:59 PM »

Another

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #83 on:** April 25, 2006, 04:16:20 PM »

OWNED !!

100% natural

candidate2025 · « **Reply #84 on:** April 25, 2006, 04:29:33 PM »

Quote from: bailey on April 24, 2006, 03:11:14 PM

I mean, For F*CK sake, ( Imagine that shot in black and white?) CRAZY !! No one can touch that. The front aint bad either !!!!

JOHN MATRIX · « **Reply #85 on:** April 25, 2006, 04:32:44 PM »

ND, you are usually a levelheaded knowledgeable guy, so its really strange how

DLEUSIONAL AND DESPERATE you are when dealing with ronnie coleman.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #86 on:** April 25, 2006, 04:40:32 PM »

Quote from: JOHN MATRIX on April 25, 2006, 04:32:44 PM

ND, you are usually a levelheaded knowledgeable guy, so its really strange how

DLEUSIONAL AND DESPERATE you are when dealing with ronnie coleman.

Well if you don't agree with me , feel free to explain why .

MisterMagoo · « **Reply #87 on:** April 25, 2006, 04:49:25 PM »

what i don't get are the claims that ronnie near the beginning of his olympia reign wasn't incredible, as nd attempts to do. flex wasn't his 93 best, but still incredible. nasser was near his peak. levrone as well, not to mention chris cormier in 1999 or shawn ray always up there. sure in 2001 and 2004 he was the "established" champion and got some gimmes, but in 1998 he was the underdog, he was a lower-ranked guy and a met-rx athlete.

if politics were what gave him his victories, the late 1990s make no sense because wheeler should have taken it. he was the favorite, the classical physique, far less blocky than dorian, and he'd just had a kid. on paper he was the clear winner. yet apparently the lackluster and gut-ridden ronnie coleman was given a victory just to piss everyone off.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #88 on:** April 25, 2006, 04:53:46 PM »

Quote from: Matt C on April 25, 2006, 04:44:05 PM

My theory: the more handsome the face, the more aesthetic the physique.

Well stick the degree you earned at University lol explain Thierry Pastel , Professor

and handsome is way to subjective a term .

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #89 on:** April 25, 2006, 04:56:35 PM »

Quote from: MisterMagoo on April 25, 2006, 04:49:25 PM

what i don't get are the claims that ronnie near the beginning of his olympia reign wasn't incredible, as nd attempts to do. flex wasn't his 93 best, but still incredible. nasser was near his peak. levrone as well, not to mention chris cormier in 1999 or shawn ray always up there. sure in 2001 and 2004 he was the "established" champion and got some gimmes, but in 1998 he was the underdog, he was a lower-ranked guy and a met-rx athlete.

if politics were what gave him his victories, the late 1990s make no sense because wheeler should have taken it. he was the favorite, the classical physique, far less blocky than dorian, and he'd just had a kid. on paper he was the clear winner. yet apparently the lackluster and gut-ridden ronnie coleman was given a victory just to piss everyone off.

Who is claiming Ronnie was great looking in 1998? I've maintained he looked excellent from 96 to about the 2001 ASC

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #90 on:** April 25, 2006, 05:05:25 PM »

Quote from: Matt C on April 25, 2006, 04:58:43 PM

Well I'm not denying that there are a few exceptions lol.

Is this a scan of yours? It appears to be one - in which case I plan to steal it.

Yeah its my scan , you can usually tell because there is a line down the middle of the pic for some unknown reason , I've cleaned the scanner and its still there , who knows , I've noticed on other sites people have using my scans and putting their watermarks on them lol but hey its the internet let everyone share the pics .

Hulkster · « **Reply #91 on:** April 25, 2006, 05:08:33 PM »

what a completely fair pic. I guess ronnie fully relaxing and inhaling compares well to kevin's fully flexed most muscular variation!

Hulkster · « **Reply #92 on:** April 25, 2006, 05:16:09 PM »

hmmm... there doesn't seem to be many shots of Ronnie "just standing there" in his pre-gut form- other than contest pics of course. Pre-gut Ronnie always looked amazing standing relaxed due to his cartoon like taper:

pumpster · « **Reply #93 on:** April 25, 2006, 05:36:03 PM »

Quote

I would say Rhul looks the better of the 2 in this pic.

More "iron age quality" comparisons: in one, Coleman's sideways while Ruhl's facing forward, in the other Lavrone's flexing and Coleman's not.

Maybe try something you're better at-golf?

LuciusFox · « **Reply #94 on:** April 25, 2006, 06:14:14 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on April 25, 2006, 05:36:03 PM

More "iron age quality" comparisons: in one, Coleman's sideways while Ruhl's facing forward, in the other Lavrone's flexing and Coleman's not. Maybe try something you're better at-golf?

Yeah, that was a pretty lame comparison

Hulkster · « **Reply #95 on:** April 25, 2006, 06:17:04 PM »

ND is a true ironager. Right on down to the double standards and shitty comparisons!

Seriously ND - no one but you can understand your hatred of Ronnie's physique, given that you love Dorian.

but yet you also love Zane and Steve Revees.

Man, your ideal physiques are all over the place!

Get some consistency man!

Beener · « **Reply #96 on:** April 25, 2006, 06:23:03 PM »

If Ronnie Coleman was a girl, he'd have some pretty good dick-suckin' lips. And hes halfway there, hes already preggers.

LuciusFox · « **Reply #97 on:** April 25, 2006, 06:26:13 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 25, 2006, 06:17:04 PM

ND is a true ironager. Right on down to the double standards and shitty comparisons!

Seriously ND - no one but you can understand your hatred of Ronnie's physique, given that you love Dorian.

but yet you also love Zane and Steve Revees.

Man, your ideal physiques are all over the place!

Get some consistency man!

ND is like a woman, he doesn't know what he wants

bailey · « **Reply #98 on:** April 25, 2006, 06:46:23 PM »

Well they can't say that this isnt as perfect as It gets. I mean what is there to pick apart here. ( Im sure the Ronnie haters will find something ). The dude is smokin It up here !! CASE OVER !!!!

3Dkiller · « **Reply #99 on:** April 25, 2006, 06:53:05 PM »

much better then Ronnie at least 240 of fatt dont have a GUT