Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: MAXX on September 10, 2008, 10:27:33 AM

Title: For ND
Post by: MAXX on September 10, 2008, 10:27:33 AM
New Dorian muscletime pic from 95 O.

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/45120-3/1995-mr-olympia-bw-23.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=784586a292cc11a4286c3d44d57b622c)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: MAXX on September 10, 2008, 10:28:17 AM
thickest lats ever?
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: MAXX on September 10, 2008, 10:29:28 AM
(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/45116-3/1995-mr-olympia-bw-20.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=df8884e0a50956caab5f5df7631aa96f)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: m8 on September 10, 2008, 10:30:40 AM
Ronnie's lats were NEVER nearly as good from the front.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: m8 on September 10, 2008, 10:32:20 AM
(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/45068-4/1995-mr-olympia-bw-08.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=a817808b97b6562417d8d723bd9d975c)
(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/45064-4/1995-mr-olympia-bw-07.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=a817808b97b6562417d8d723bd9d975c)
Wow, Nasser and Kev both look off-season next to Dorian.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: MAXX on September 10, 2008, 10:32:41 AM
(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/45060-4/1995-mr-olympia-bw-06.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=df8884e0a50956caab5f5df7631aa96f)

Shawn is damn good to. Kevin impressive to!
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: MAXX on September 10, 2008, 10:34:49 AM
(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/45052-3/1995-mr-olympia-bw-04.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=df8884e0a50956caab5f5df7631aa96f)

damn shame about that bicep. check out Shawns vacum!
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: MAXX on September 10, 2008, 10:36:14 AM
(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/45040-4/1995-mr-olympia-bw-01.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=df8884e0a50956caab5f5df7631aa96f)

delts and triceps from mars  :o
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: m8 on September 10, 2008, 10:39:22 AM
(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/45040-4/1995-mr-olympia-bw-01.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=df8884e0a50956caab5f5df7631aa96f)

delts and triceps from mars  :o

I can't believe Muscletime thinks Kevin should have won.  ::)
Kevin was SOFT.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 10:42:14 AM
New Dorian muscletime pic from 95 O.

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/45120-3/1995-mr-olympia-bw-23.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=784586a292cc11a4286c3d44d57b622c)

Yeah I was just checking them out very impressive , among the best he ever looked onstage especially in that shot , shows how great he was at his best
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RZA on September 10, 2008, 10:42:21 AM
Ronnie's lats were NEVER nearly as good from the front.

True. Ronnie's lats looked great on back poses, specially when he was at a lower weight (in '98) with a tighter waist. But even in the back poses, he was wider than Dorian but never as grainy nor hard (except maybe '98). From the front, Dorian's lat spread is unequaled.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: TrueGrit on September 10, 2008, 11:03:53 AM
Yates' conditioning is noticeably sharper than everyone else's too!
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Earl1972 on September 10, 2008, 11:14:59 AM
(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/45068-4/1995-mr-olympia-bw-08.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=a817808b97b6562417d8d723bd9d975c)
(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/45064-4/1995-mr-olympia-bw-07.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=a817808b97b6562417d8d723bd9d975c)
Wow, Nasser and Kev both look off-season next to Dorian.

off season?  are you fuckin blind ???

E
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 10, 2008, 11:31:33 AM
Dillet with his "bad back" owning the barrel on both lat width and taper. Arm comparison fuggedaboudit.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: GhostDog on September 10, 2008, 11:46:48 AM
Dillet with his "bad back" owning the barrel on both lat width and taper. Arm comparison fuggedaboudit.
sad that you are so jealous of dorian getting any praise. its not healthy to be that obsessed with another man
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: JasonH on September 10, 2008, 11:53:30 AM
Yates in '95 was easily his best showing after '93 - he has said it himself. No-one could touch him that year, torn bicep or not.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 10, 2008, 11:56:59 AM
(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/45060-4/1995-mr-olympia-bw-06.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=df8884e0a50956caab5f5df7631aa96f)

Shawn is damn good to. Kevin impressive to!
Dorian had a good back period, from the front and rear lat spread. but his back double bicep was shit, not just due to the tremendously small and crapily shaped arms but his back didnt look good in this pose. the lats look low and defined but it has no flair or taper and although he has great lower back striations his lats and teres major look like poo next to shawn and kev. also nobody ever points out how his right lat always looks smaller and shorter than the left in all pic. just cause he has a big back dosent mean he looks good in back poses, from the font the lats look crazy(helps that his small arms dont block them from the front either) but nobody can say that his bdb in contests looks apealing at all.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Mars on September 10, 2008, 12:02:48 PM
(http://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n257/daniel330/levrone.jpg)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 12:42:57 PM
Dorian had a good back period, from the front and rear lat spread. but his back double bicep was shit, not just due to the tremendously small and crapily shaped arms but his back didnt look good in this pose. the lats look low and defined but it has no flair or taper and although he has great lower back striations his lats and teres major look like poo next to shawn and kev. also nobody ever points out how his right lat always looks smaller and shorter than the left in all pic. just cause he has a big back dosent mean he looks good in back poses, from the font the lats look crazy(helps that his small arms dont block them from the front either) but nobody can say that his bdb in contests looks apealing at all.

It easy to spot who knows how competitive bodybuilding contests are judged and those who don't and guess which category you fall into?  ;)

you just actually typed Dorian's lats & teres look like poo next to Shawn Ray LMFAO

and FYI back double biceps poses aren't judged on how ' apealing ' ( sic ) they look , there is a strict set of criterion that they judges follow but I'm sure you knew this lol
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: jaejonna on September 10, 2008, 12:52:55 PM
It easy to spot who knows how competitive bodybuilding contests are judged and those who don't and guess which category you fall into?  ;)

you just actually typed Dorian's lats & teres look like poo next to Shawn Ray LMFAO

and FYI back double biceps poses aren't judged on how ' apealing ' ( sic ) they look , there is a strict set of criterion that they judges follow but I'm sure you knew this lol
Dorian's back Dbl bi pose was never executed properly, Ray and Levrone are owning him there ....
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 01:04:56 PM
Dorian's back Dbl bi pose was never executed properly, Ray and Levrone are owning him there ....

Elaborate on this , don't just make a blanket statement please explain exactly WHY it's not ' executed properly ' I'm dying to hear this lol and Ray and Levrone aren't touching Dorian in that pose not by a long shot
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 10, 2008, 02:33:38 PM
Yates at right looking positively putrid from the back while owned by Nasser.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: The Coach on September 10, 2008, 02:39:37 PM
Another Olympia Shawn got ripped off in.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 10, 2008, 06:32:12 PM
Another Olympia Shawn got ripped off in.

true.

his glutes/hams are killing dorian's in the rear double bi shot too.

top to bottom, he is winning that pose over both kevin and dorian..
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 06:33:45 PM
Yates at right looking positively putrid from the back while owned by Nasser.

Same contest the prospective is changed and its a whole other story  ;)

owned
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 06:35:59 PM
true.

his glutes/hams are killing dorian's in the rear double bi shot too.

top to bottom, he is winning that pose over both kevin and dorian..

lmfao top to bottom? are you high? he's severely down in one of the biggest parts of the criteria , muscular bulk and he's winning that pose? he has a middleweight's torso and heavyweight's arms and he's winning that pose? his small high calves are dominated by his quads and he's winning that pose?

no wonder why Kevin Horton called you a ' retard ' lol
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 10, 2008, 06:36:53 PM
yeah, like I give a shit what Kevin "I was proven wrong so I ran away" Thorton says LOL

 ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 06:39:30 PM
yeah, like I give a shit what Kevin "I was proven wrong so I ran away" Thorton says LOL

 ::)

lmfao of course you do lol one of the very best contest photographers in the history of competitive bodybuilding exposed you & Bizzy for enhanced pictures and he called you a fag and a ' retard '

you're done lol

you have nothing left sucker  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 10, 2008, 06:43:04 PM
he might be a great photographer but that doesn't mean he was right in that particular case. he was proven wrong by me (and bizzy) for everyone to see. and he knew it and left. end of story.

thats what you don't seem to understand...
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 06:45:54 PM
he might be a great photographer but that doesn't mean he was right in that particular case. he was proven wrong by me (and bizzy) for everyone to see. and he knew it and left. end of story.

thats what you don't seem to understand...

lmfao you couldn't even respond to his challenge you didn't prove ANYTHING or ANYONE wrong you actually tried to defend Bizzy's screencaps by using forcedreps quotes LMFAO



Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 10, 2008, 06:47:02 PM
lmfao you couldn't even respond to his challenge you didn't prove ANYTHING or ANYONE wrong you actually tried to defend Bizzy's screencaps by using forcedreps quotes LMFAO





of course I did.

the forcedreps quotes illustrate that despite your praying, the screencaps of ronnie 99 have been real from day one. I posted that to inform him of the nuthuggers constant cries of fake pics from a fucking year ago.. ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 06:49:36 PM
of course I did.

the forcedreps quotes illustrate that despite your praying, the screencaps of ronnie 99 have been real from day one.

LMFAO total decpetion , look here is the quote explaining the whole story LMFAO the quote wasn't even about the person in question , you're busted trying to lie about the enhanced screencaps lol forcedreps have NOTHING to do with it

and again I asked you a dozen times post the exact quote where I claimed ALL 1999 screencaps are enhanced , we're all waiting Mr deception  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 10, 2008, 07:02:13 PM
Same contest the prospective is changed and its a whole other story  ;)

owned


hahahaa the barrel's arms are just as putrid there.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 07:04:10 PM

hahahaa the barrel's arms are just as putrid there.

What else are you going to say? you're owned your strawman picture proved ZERO you change the prospective and the story changes , and what are you going to cling to next? Nasser's arms were bigger than Dorians? WELL DUH they're supposed to be he outweighs him by a hefty margin  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 10, 2008, 07:05:27 PM
What else are you going to say?

SF's right, I WANT whatever drugs you're on.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 07:08:53 PM
SF's right, I WANT whatever drugs you're on.

See as usual when countered with reason and logic , you avoid at all costs replying with a cognizant retort , you rely on strawmen and default answers you're scared of debating the topic because its beyond your knowledge

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 10, 2008, 07:16:52 PM
Dorian's back Dbl bi pose was never executed properly, Ray and Levrone are owning him there ....
Very true, he didnt lean back at all he just sort of stood strait and raised his arms like a fdb from the back.
and to that retard nd that keeps arguing a battle that cant be won, yes in the pic posted b4 his teres major and lats look like shit compared to kev and shawn. quit acting like your some sort of guru judge, dorian is ketting killed in that pic and your the only moron tht does not see that, just because dorians lats/teres might have been bigger and better than the other two gentlemen does not mean it lookd better in that pose cause oviously they dont. btw whiping out the ifbb rule book dosent mean shit cause a) you interprit everything to your crush's advantage(dorian wasent balanced, tiny arms with one even tinier and over powering calves. ps arms are carry more weight in terms of a physique than calves) and b) the ifbb is not very consistant or credible in their judging evident by countless ridiculous calls they have made.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 10, 2008, 07:21:44 PM
Same contest the prospective is changed and its a whole other story  ;)

owned
yeah the perspective, favors dorians forearm from that angle(it was still bigger but the angle is whats making the drastic difference) other than that nassers arm is still owning both bis(oviously) and dorians half elbow tris  ;).
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 07:24:22 PM
Very true, he didnt lean back at all he just sort of stood strait and raised his arms like a fdb from the back.
and to that retard nd that keeps arguing a battle that cant be won, yes in the pic posted b4 his teres major and lats look like shit compared to kev and shawn. quit acting like your some sort of guru judge, dorian is ketting killed in that pic and your the only moron tht does not see that, just because dorians lats/teres might have been bigger and better than the other two gentlemen does not mean it lookd better in that pose cause oviously they dont. btw whiping out the ifbb rule book dosent mean shit cause a) you interprit everything to your crush's advantage(dorian wasent balanced, tiny arms with one even tinier and over powering calves. ps arms are carry more weight in terms of a physique than calves) and b) the ifbb is not very consistant or credible in their judging evident by countless ridiculous calls they have made.

Fuck me talk about one gigantic run-on sentence with multiple grammar and syntax errors . I could barely read what the hell you wrote LMFAO I will only excuse this abortion if English is not your first Language

and sure the criteria doesn't mean anything LMFAO it's not like that's how they actually judge contests to see who has the superior physique lol Look I like to entertain everyone's point of view by the moment you claimed Shawn Ray has better lats than Dorian in the back double biceps shot I just gave up on you lol I came to the conclusion you're insanely ignorant.

enjoy your ignorance you have plenty of company on here  ;)

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 10, 2008, 07:25:25 PM
Very true, he didnt lean back at all he just sort of stood strait and raised his arms like a fdb from the back.
and to that retard nd that keeps arguing a battle that cant be won, yes in the pic posted b4 his teres major and lats look like shit compared to kev and shawn. quit acting like your some sort of guru judge, dorian is ketting killed in that pic and your the only moron tht does not see that, just because dorians lats/teres might have been bigger and better than the other two gentlemen does not mean it lookd better in that pose cause oviously they dont. btw whiping out the ifbb rule book dosent mean shit cause a) you interprit everything to your crush's advantage(dorian wasent balanced, tiny arms with one even tinier and over powering calves. ps arms are carry more weight in terms of a physique than calves) and b) the ifbb is not very consistant or credible in their judging evident by countless ridiculous calls they have made.

great post!!
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 07:26:21 PM
yeah the perspective, favors dorians forearm from that angle(it was still bigger but the angle is whats making the drastic difference) other than that nassers arm is still owning both bis(oviously) and dorians half elbow tris  ;).

No Dorian's forearms are clearly better than Nassers at any angle that's not open for discussion. and Nasser does how better biceps no argument , Dorian's triceps are comparable and if you're moaning about arm size , Nasser better have bigger arms he outweighed Yates by a hefty margin  ;)

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 10, 2008, 07:26:31 PM
Quote
I could barely read what the hell you wrote

you can barely read english most of the time...
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 07:27:13 PM
great post!!

where did you get that from?  ;)

you're so desperate to beat me you're copying everything I type lol

owned
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 07:28:14 PM
you can barely read english most of the time...

I read this quite fine thank you  ;)

Kevin Horton on Hulkster ' a retard '

LMFAO

Hulkster the retard = owned , next
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 10, 2008, 07:30:23 PM
I read this quite fine thank you  ;)

Kevin Horton on Hulkster ' a retard '

LMFAO

Hulkster the retard = owned , next

its so sad that he got owned so very badly (and ran away) that all you can do is keep saying that he "called me a retard" LOL

 ::)

what are you, three years old? :-\
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 07:32:02 PM
its so sad that he got owned so very badly (and ran away) that all you can do is keep saying that he "called me a retard" LOL

 ::)

what are you, three years old? :-\

I didn't call you a retard HE did  ;) and I agree with him obviously and are you a 3 year old? you copy everything I do that's what children do

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Camel Jockey on September 10, 2008, 07:32:20 PM
New Dorian muscletime pic from 95 O.

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/45120-3/1995-mr-olympia-bw-23.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=784586a292cc11a4286c3d44d57b622c)

Look how small his arms are  :-\

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 10, 2008, 07:34:12 PM
yes, he called me a retard..just before he ran away because he was proven wrong and couldn't take it...


 ::)

once again, why you are siding with someone who was not only proven wrong, but couldn't handle it and ran away like a baby is beyond me...

but suit yourself.

you fit in well with people who get proven wrong and run away.. lol
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 07:36:24 PM
Look how small his arms are  :-\



Same contest are his arms small? it's all a matter of prospective
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 10, 2008, 07:37:08 PM
off season?  are you fuckin blind ???

E
why does dorian yates's face look like it was ran over by a herd of cows?  :D
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 07:39:00 PM
yes, he called me a retard..just before he ran away because he was proven wrong and couldn't take it...


 ::)

once again, why you are siding with someone who was not only proven wrong, but couldn't handle it and ran away like a baby is beyond me...

but suit yourself.

you fit in well with people who get proven wrong and run away.. lol

Hulkster what else are you going to say? sorry? LMFAO I was wrong lol

your M.O. is this , you're proven wrong , dead wrong what do you do? go on a massive multiple post meltdown claiming the exact opposite of what really happened , do you think anyone agrees with you? do you think anyone cares? the jig is up everyone knows you're a troll and the ones that agree with you are in the same boat
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 10, 2008, 07:39:08 PM
why does dorian yates's face look like it was ran over by a herd of cows?  :D

so it matches his body? ;D:
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 10, 2008, 07:43:08 PM
Fuck me talk about one gigantic run-on sentence with multiple grammar and syntax errors . I could barely read what the hell you wrote LMFAO I will only excuse this abortion if English is not your first Language

and sure the criteria doesn't mean anything LMFAO it's not like that's how they actually judge contests to see who has the superior physique lol Look I like to entertain everyone's point of view by the moment you claimed Shawn Ray has better lats than Dorian in the back double biceps shot I just gave up on you lol I came to the conclusion you're insanely ignorant.

enjoy your ignorance you have plenty of company on here  ;)


i'll just say I was typing furiously and got carried away, i done with good grammer after school hours  LOL.
but hey you did spell prospective when meaning perspective so dont get too high on your grammer horse.
btw i know there's a criteria but most can agree its not very good and not followed consistanly...but hey i'll just cry "politics" like everyone else does to somewhat get my point across next time cause u know what meant  :D
how do you see doz's lats looking better in the rdb and only in the rdb, please explain cause i gave my opinion now i would like to hear how you think doz's bdb is better than shawns or kevs judging from that photo?
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: England_1 on September 10, 2008, 07:44:47 PM
holy FUCK! Coleman NEVER had taper like this! HULKSTER OWNED hahahahahahah

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/45120-3/1995-mr-olympia-bw-23.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=784586a292cc11a4286c3d44d57b622c)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 10, 2008, 07:45:04 PM
No Dorian's forearms are clearly better than Nassers at any angle that's not open for discussion. and Nasser does how better biceps no argument , Dorian's triceps are comparable and if you're moaning about arm size , Nasser better have bigger arms he outweighed Yates by a hefty margin  ;)


i clearly said his forearms were bigger( but the angle amplifies this). so what if he was heavier he was bigger all over(except back of course) with a smaller waist too. shawn and kev were lighter than dorian and their arms were much better.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: England_1 on September 10, 2008, 07:45:37 PM
Dorian with a smaller waist than Kevin. Fucking insane!

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/45064-4/1995-mr-olympia-bw-07.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=a817808b97b6562417d8d723bd9d975c)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 07:46:20 PM
i'll just say I was typing furiously and got carried away, i done with good grammer after school hours  LOL.
but hey you did spell prospective when meaning perspective so dont get too high on your grammer horse.
btw i know there's a criteria but most can agree its not very good and not followed consistanly...but hey i'll just cry "politics" like everyone else does to somewhat get my point across next time cause u know what meant  :D
how do you see doz's lats looking better in the rdb and only in the rdb, please explain cause i gave my opinion now i would like to hear how you think doz's bdb is better than shawns or kevs judging from that photo?

it's grammar NOT grammer

and thanks for admitting you're melting down when you typed ' furiously ' lol you gave your opinion yet you NEVER elaborated on it , you just made a blanket statement. and Shawn is in no way , shape or form comparable to Dorian in terms of lats that nonsense wont be entertained
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 10, 2008, 07:46:30 PM
holy FUCK! Coleman NEVER had taper like this! HULKSTER OWNED hahahahahahah

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/45120-3/1995-mr-olympia-bw-23.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=784586a292cc11a4286c3d44d57b622c)
you are a little slow:

dorian never had a taper like this:
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Alex23 on September 10, 2008, 07:46:41 PM
I have him 3rd.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 07:47:02 PM
Dorian with a smaller waist than Kevin. Fucking insane!

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/45064-4/1995-mr-olympia-bw-07.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=a817808b97b6562417d8d723bd9d975c)

The difference in lats is staggering as well as conditioning
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 10, 2008, 07:47:43 PM
notice how dorian's quads always suck compared to shawns..
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 07:48:36 PM
you are a little slow:

dorian never had a taper like this:

LMFAO Dorian has a naturally wider waist & hips for him to appear like that shows you how massive he really his , he would make Ronnie look like a child
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 10, 2008, 07:49:20 PM
The difference in lats is staggering as well as conditioning

shawn was just as well conditioned as dorian was at that show
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 07:49:45 PM
notice how dorian's quads always suck compared to shawns..

Notice how Shawn's thigh rod's are MIA? notice how Shawn's calves always sucked in comparison to Dorian? notice how Shawn has NO back compared to Dorian? I mean shall I continue?  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 10, 2008, 07:50:18 PM
Quote
LMFAO Dorian has a naturally wider waist & hips

exactly.

part of why he was not nearly as good as Ronnie...
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 07:51:11 PM
shawn was just as well conditioned as dorian was at that show

I would say he was , however I was referencing Levrone and thats all good however he's down 55 pounds lol so his equal conditioning does it no good
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2008, 07:53:35 PM
exactly.

part of why he was not nearly as good as Ronnie...

LMFAO you're just so ignorant of how contests are judged , look at the amazing taper on Yates in that pic and thats with naturally wider hips & waist that shows you how insanely wide he is if thats the case , Dorian's lats just crush Ronnies nevermind the whole packaged , conditioning , balance & proportion , completeness , etc , etc your small waist & hips is like Shawn's equal conditioning it doesn't do him any good when he's behind everywhere else lol
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 10, 2008, 07:54:15 PM
it's grammar NOT grammer

and thanks for admitting you're melting down when you typed ' furiously ' lol you gave your opinion yet you NEVER elaborated on it , you just made a blanket statement. and Shawn is in no way , shape or form comparable to Dorian in terms of lats that nonsense wont be entertained
"grammer" was on purpose, prospecive boy  ;)
yeah i melted down, cause i was really furious  ::)
i did elaborate on a few post before, however you cannot explain your side cause shawn is owning yates in that rdb and their is no logical counter argument that he isnt. dorian looks like a decrepid masters bodybuilder in that shot and looks like shit next to shawn, who cares if he heavier or has bigger lats, its not translating in that pose and his "graininess" is bested by the fact that shawn is crearly more cut and good old defined...plain and simple.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 10, 2008, 07:56:16 PM
Quote
dorian looks like a decrepid masters bodybuilder

hahahahahahahha

ND's overrated hero
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 10, 2008, 07:57:27 PM
New Dorian muscletime pic from 95 O.

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/45120-3/1995-mr-olympia-bw-23.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=784586a292cc11a4286c3d44d57b622c)

  I guess I was wrong. Not only does Dorian win the back double biceps, rear lat spread, abs-and-thighs, side triceps, front lat spread, the relaxed round from the back and sides, but he also wins the front relaxed pose as well! Dorian would totally dominate and demolish Coleman if both were to compete in their primes.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 10, 2008, 07:57:39 PM
Quote
look at the amazing taper on Yates in that pic and thats with naturally wider hips & waist that shows you how insanely wide he is if thats the case ,

too bad ronnie was just as wide only with narrower hips and waist LOL

you just can't win can you?
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 10, 2008, 07:58:27 PM
I don't know what you people are on but
Ronnie coleman  1999 owns all dorian yates in the world combined  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 10, 2008, 07:59:37 PM
I don't know what you people are on but
Ronnie coleman  1999 owns all dorian yates in the world combined  ;)

  This sentence doesen't even make sense. Shows the intelligence level of Coleman fans. :-\

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 10, 2008, 08:00:29 PM
I don't know what you people are on but
Ronnie coleman  1999 owns all dorian yates in the world combined  ;)

no shit.

its ND and his two bitches who are slow.

I mean, look at this:

dorian's SIGNATURE shot and its NOT EVEN CLOSE: ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 10, 2008, 08:01:17 PM
look- the aids man quads look even better in black and white LOL

ronnie is killing him.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 10, 2008, 08:01:56 PM
no shit.

its ND and his two bitches who are slow.

I mean, look at this:

dorian's SIGNATURE shot and its NOT EVEN CLOSE: ::)
look at those fucking striations across his chest  :o
shit son
anyone who says yates was better should be made to take HGH and gain a face like him  ;D
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 10, 2008, 08:02:28 PM
lol dorian's aids man arms and aids man quads don't even have cuts.

and ronnie's look fantastic..

ronnie is crushing him..
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 10, 2008, 08:03:11 PM
look at those fucking striations across his chest  :o
shit son
anyone who says yates was better should be made to take HGH and gain a face like him  ;D

yup.

its not close when we are talking about 99 ronnie.

despite ND's wishes, Ronnie 99 was not the ronnie that dorian faced.

as we can clearly see.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 10, 2008, 08:06:58 PM
yup.

its not close when we are talking about 99 ronnie.

despite ND's wishes, Ronnie 99 was not the ronnie that dorian faced.

as we can clearly see.
was it true that ronnie was actually a life time natural up to 1995?
milos sarcev said he was  ???
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 10, 2008, 08:07:27 PM
was it true that ronnie was actually a life time natural up to 1995?
milos sarcev said he was  ???

no it wasn't.

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 10, 2008, 08:09:38 PM
no it wasn't.


they why the fuck would milos go around spreading things like that  >:(
im gonna kick him in the head while he is finishing one of his giant sets and drinking his protein shake  >:(
LOL  ;D
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 10, 2008, 08:09:47 PM
I don't know what you people are on but
Ronnie coleman  1999 owns all dorian yates in the world combined  ;)
pressisely, these guys continue to argue over the small details and who wins what...some things u dont argue, they are just ovious to people who do not suck(they want 2 anyway, im sure dorian would be creeped out bey these queers) on the penis of dorian yates...better debate is ray vs yates...i have a hunch that if this nd guy is not infact a loony homosexual stalker of dorian yates then there is a chance he might actually be dorian himself, people are always going to argue for themselves no matter how rediculous and widely opposed the argument is ;D
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Camel Jockey on September 10, 2008, 08:16:24 PM
Man.. Just think had Kevin dailed it in he would have been Mr. O easy  :-\
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 10, 2008, 08:17:42 PM
Man.. Just think had Kevin dailed it in he would have been Mr. O easy  :-\
he dialed it in plenty of times
Mr. Olympia is more POLITICS than anything else  ::)
who looks better than Levrone 2002?  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: johnny on September 10, 2008, 08:19:00 PM
Fuck me talk about one gigantic run-on sentence with multiple grammar and syntax errors . I could barely read what the hell you wrote LMFAO I will only excuse this abortion if English is not your first Language

and sure the criteria doesn't mean anything LMFAO it's not like that's how they actually judge contests to see who has the superior physique lol Look I like to entertain everyone's point of view by the moment you claimed Shawn Ray has better lats than Dorian in the back double biceps shot I just gave up on you lol I came to the conclusion you're insanely ignorant.

enjoy your ignorance you have plenty of company on here  ;)


Hahahahahahahahahahaha!!!! ;D ;D ;D You blokes Hulkster, etc... are keen to trade insults with N.D...good luck!! :-X :-X :-X
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 10, 2008, 08:28:24 PM
Hahahahahahahahahahaha!!!! ;D ;D ;D You blokes Hulkster, etc... are keen to trade insults with N.D...good luck!! :-X :-X :-X
who gives a shit about writing correctly on a bb site, besides he miss spells things all the time aswell but most people dont log on to getbig to recieve or give english 101 lessons.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: England_1 on September 10, 2008, 09:56:43 PM
Hulkster is so sad it's pathetic. He'll do ANYTHING to bring down Yates lol. These pictures seal the deal regarding Yates' dominance over coleman. This front lat spread is ridiculous!

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=233409.0;attach=273103;image)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: England_1 on September 10, 2008, 10:01:36 PM
Dorian's size and perfect shape and symmetry in this pose is undoubtedly the best ever! He is just dwarfing the competition!

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/24228-3/1995-mr-olympia-139.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=31babbe4aa0bb288a1c288decee53a9d)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: m8 on September 10, 2008, 10:02:23 PM
why does dorian yates's face look like it was ran over by a herd of cows?  :D

He has the face and sunken cheeks of a guy that is at a ULTRA-LOW, Mentzer-like bodyfat level.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 01:14:29 AM
"grammer" was on purpose, prospecive boy  ;)
yeah i melted down, cause i was really furious  ::)
i did elaborate on a few post before, however you cannot explain your side cause shawn is owning yates in that rdb and their is no logical counter argument that he isnt. dorian looks like a decrepid masters bodybuilder in that shot and looks like shit next to shawn, who cares if he heavier or has bigger lats, its not translating in that pose and his "graininess" is bested by the fact that shawn is crearly more cut and good old defined...plain and simple.

No you didn't elaborate you made a blanket statement while dismissing the judging criteria ' who cares if he heavier ' and don't get me started on the syntax ' he heavier ' ? WTF?

you actually typed Shawn Ray has better lats than Dorian Yates , taking you seriously ended the moment you typed that .
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 11, 2008, 01:15:44 AM
The barrel owned in his own signature pose.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 01:32:32 AM
The barrel owned in his own signature pose.

typical move of Coleman fans , post pics make blanket statements and run like hell when pushed for an explanation

Dorian is easily winning that shot and why? look at the main muscle the shot calls for its night & day , Dorian's lats just blow Coleman's out of the water , they have a better sweep they insert lower and they take up more space , notice the difference between now much space there is between both guys arms when doing that pose  ;)

Then factor in Dorian's arms , ARMS , biceps/triceps/forearms are all in harmony with each other and his torso , Ronnie's big biceps & triceps dominate his forearms and lets not get into torso length or the fact you can actually see Coleman's glutes in a front pose  :-X then moving down to lower balance & proportion , well its obvious Yates has proportionate calves in relation to his quads , and Ronnie well lol we all know about his infamously pathetic calves

seeing all rounds are physique rounds Dorian is the clear winner in this shot
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 11, 2008, 01:36:35 AM
The barrel owned in his own signature pose.

UMMM??? Is everyone looking at these and realizing that Dorian is looking incredible here? Ronnies lats look shit compared.

I'm a fan of both but it's clear that Yates was incredible in 95
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 11, 2008, 03:41:25 AM
Dorian's size and perfect shape and symmetry in this pose is undoubtedly the best ever! He is just dwarfing the competition!

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/24228-3/1995-mr-olympia-139.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=31babbe4aa0bb288a1c288decee53a9d)

sorry Pubes, but your boy gets killed by a peak 99 Ronnie:

we are all still waiting of a contest shot of dorian's lat spread to beat this:

it will never happen. even in 93/95 he couldn't compete: the lat thickness, striations, cuts are too much for dorian:
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 11, 2008, 03:42:42 AM
just look at the difference in the pecs (dorians are smoonth), quads (not even close - dorian have the cuts of a ball of pizza dough. dorians
 arms are undersized  etc etc)

its just not close.

even HypocriticDeity knows this ronnie 99 lat spread cannot be touched by dorian.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Gino30 on September 11, 2008, 05:52:41 AM
these threads blow.....juvenile, zit-popping,  keyboard tossing, dumb asses,  with 16K posts to their name, still having mummy and daddy wipe their asses for them....

"from top to bottom"...... ::)  lol  funniest thing ive seen all week

DORIAN for the WINnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

ps....go the Somoan legend Sonny Schmidt....RIP brother....
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: m8 on September 11, 2008, 05:55:59 AM
The barrel owned in his own signature pose.

You can't even see their calves and Dorian is still destroying him in that comparison. Too easy.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 11, 2008, 06:49:54 AM
You can't even see their calves and Dorian is still destroying him in that comparison. Too easy.
while I respect your opinion I completely disagree with that statement  :D
so  :D
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: England_1 on September 11, 2008, 09:44:38 AM
sorry Pubes, but your boy gets killed by a peak 99 Ronnie:

we are all still waiting of a contest shot of dorian's lat spread to beat this:

it will never happen. even in 93/95 he couldn't compete: the lat thickness, striations, cuts are too much for dorian:

lat thickness? hahahaha. Coleman's lats are whims of cotton compared to Yates' lats. Shit, in that picture even Cormier has bigger and thicker lats than Ron. LOL.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 09:49:06 AM
just look at the difference in the pecs (dorians are smoonth), quads (not even close - dorian have the cuts of a ball of pizza dough. dorians
 arms are undersized  etc etc)

its just not close.

even HypocriticDeity knows this ronnie 99 lat spread cannot be touched by dorian.

lmfao did you miss the above post?

Dorian is easily winning that shot and why? look at the main muscle the shot calls for its night & day , Dorian's lats just blow Coleman's out of the water , they have a better sweep they insert lower and they take up more space , notice the difference between now much space there is between both guys arms when doing that pose  Wink

Then factor in Dorian's arms , ARMS , biceps/triceps/forearms are all in harmony with each other and his torso , Ronnie's big biceps & triceps dominate his forearms and lets not get into torso length or the fact you can actually see Coleman's glutes in a front pose  Lips sealed then moving down to lower balance & proportion , well its obvious Yates has proportionate calves in relation to his quads , and Ronnie well lol we all know about his infamously pathetic calves

seeing all rounds are physique rounds Dorian is the clear winner in this shot


Ronnie 99 can't touch Dorian in the front latspread while thats among the best front latspreads he's shown its NOT in Dorian's league and what you just did cherry pick the criteria it doesn't work that way

Ronnie is behind Dorian in terms of density & dryness , balance & proportion , comparable in terms of muscular bulk and behind on completeness and posing

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 11, 2008, 09:53:33 AM
UMMM??? Is everyone looking at these and realizing that Dorian is looking incredible here? Ronnies lats look shit compared.

I'm a fan of both but it's clear that Yates was incredible in 95

Ya, so what if Coleman's latz are far wider along with a smaller waist & drastically better taper huh? Details, details. ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 11, 2008, 09:54:00 AM
lmfao did you miss the above post?

Dorian is easily winning that shot and why? look at the main muscle the shot calls for its night & day , Dorian's lats just blow Coleman's out of the water , they have a better sweep they insert lower and they take up more space , notice the difference between now much space there is between both guys arms when doing that pose  Wink

Then factor in Dorian's arms , ARMS , biceps/triceps/forearms are all in harmony with each other and his torso , Ronnie's big biceps & triceps dominate his forearms and lets not get into torso length or the fact you can actually see Coleman's glutes in a front pose  Lips sealed then moving down to lower balance & proportion , well its obvious Yates has proportionate calves in relation to his quads , and Ronnie well lol we all know about his infamously pathetic calves

seeing all rounds are physique rounds Dorian is the clear winner in this shot


Ronnie 99 can't touch Dorian in the front latspread while thats among the best front latspreads he's shown its NOT in Dorian's league and what you just did cherry pick the criteria it doesn't work that way

Ronnie is behind Dorian in terms of density & dryness , balance & proportion , comparable in terms of muscular bulk and behind on completeness and posing


Excellent analysis. This should finally put and end to these stupid comments from Hulkster. I'm a big fan of both and have to agree with ND here.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 11, 2008, 09:56:09 AM
You can't even see their calves and Dorian is still destroying him in that comparison. Too easy.

So what if Coleman's kicking his ass on taper, defintion, detail and sweep lol Yates has him on everything else haha
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 09:56:52 AM
lat thickness? hahahaha. Coleman's lats are whims of cotton compared to Yates' lats. Shit, in that picture even Cormier has bigger and thicker lats than Ron. LOL.

I laughed out loud when I read that too lol Dorian's lats are above and beyond Colemans , just look at the difference in sweep and the amount of space they fill between the arms , Dorian all the way

Hulkster is in a perpetual state of meltdown after Kevin exposed him and Bizzy and calling him a ' retard '

lmfao @ thicker lats
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 09:58:01 AM
Ya, so what if Coleman's latz are far wider along with a smaller waist & drastically better taper huh? Details, details. ::)

LMFAO yeah far wider my ass , same contest
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 10:00:29 AM
So what if Coleman's kicking his ass on taper, defintion, detail and sweep lol Yates has him on everything else haha

So what if Dorian destroys him on balance & proportion , density & dryness and posing and presentation not to mention completeness and oh lats , its not like any of that matters to the judged LMFAO

and see above pic their lats are NOT comparable in terms of length and your slanted comparison has them with equal lat length which means the scale is OFF and its off on purpose
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 10:01:13 AM
Excellent analysis. This should finally put and end to these stupid comments from Hulkster. I'm a big fan of both and have to agree with ND here.

Thank you , you're a smart man !!  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 11, 2008, 10:01:56 AM
LMFAO yeah far wider my ass , same contest

Nice shot of the barrel's nonexistent arms excellent self-ownage there. As far as backs, that's at an angle as you already know lol


Quote
Thank you , you're a smart man !!

More like patient, to wade thru all that self-indulgent meandering lol
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 10:08:44 AM
Nice shot of the barrel's nonexistent arms excellent self-ownage there. As far as backs, that's at an angle as you already know lol


More like patient, to wade thru all that self-indulgent meandering lol

yeah like the angle doesn't favor Ronnie in the pic you posted  ::) wider my ass especially not in 1996

again you fear formulating a cognizant response you're content to troll and make blanket statements , you can't even use the criteria for your opinion you just cherry pick and ignore what really wins contests

hey here is another pic of Yates destroying one of your ebony heros  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: England_1 on September 11, 2008, 10:18:34 AM
Holy FUCKKKKKKK. Yates KILLS Coleman. Coleman never had taper like this with those shitty lats of his haha

LMFAO at "ebony hero" hahahahahaha

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=233409.0;attach=273221;image)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: England_1 on September 11, 2008, 10:20:58 AM
Dorian's lats are so much thicker here it's not even funny. Coleman's are flimsy in comparison  :-\

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=233409.0;attach=273217;image)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 11, 2008, 11:50:10 AM
Dorian Yates OWNED again   ;D
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 11, 2008, 11:58:11 AM
dorian yates vs coleman
we can all see who wins  8)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 11, 2008, 11:59:25 AM
another one
  ;D
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 11, 2008, 12:49:16 PM
Durka Durka
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 11, 2008, 12:53:48 PM
Durka Durka
Durka Durka
Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka  ???
Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka  ::)
Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka  ;)
Durka   :)
Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka Durka  :-* :-* :-*
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Earl1972 on September 11, 2008, 01:16:33 PM
Dorian with a smaller waist than Kevin. Fucking insane!

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/45064-4/1995-mr-olympia-bw-07.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=a817808b97b6562417d8d723bd9d975c)

haha you have to be joking

E
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 01:37:38 PM
haha you have to be joking

E

You have to admit its comparable? when held tight and flexed in this pose?
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 11, 2008, 01:38:53 PM
You have to admit its comparable? when held tight and flexed in this pose?
Kevin looks soft in that photo - Shawn and Dorian are far better conditioned.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Earl1972 on September 11, 2008, 01:39:36 PM
You have to admit its comparable? when held tight and flexed in this pose?

in this pic maybe, in the hundreds of other pics NO

E
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 01:42:17 PM
in this pic maybe, in the hundreds of other pics NO

E

Kevin clearly has a smaller waist but in that pic it looks comparable when Dorian didn't hold his obliques in tight you could see the difference
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 01:45:26 PM
Kevin looks soft in that photo - Shawn and Dorian are far better conditioned.

He is that whats Kevin's main problem finding the perfect balance between size AND condition

you usually got two versions of Kevin the big soft Kevin or the small ripped one. but that's what you get when you're a part-time bodybuilder
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 11, 2008, 01:46:39 PM
He is that whats Kevin's main problem finding the perfect balance between size AND condition

you usually got two versions of Kevin the big soft Kevin or the small ripped one. but that's what you get when you're a part-time bodybuilder
And you get one version of Dorian - HARD AS NAILS
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 01:50:27 PM
And you get one version of Dorian - HARD AS NAILS

Right massive and hard as nails that's Dorian's calling card

Bill Dobbins on Yates at the 1995 Olympia

As Weider photographer Bill Dobbins so succinctly put it as Yates strutted his stuff : " I have never seen such muscle development on a human being. The other guys sit around backstage talking about whether to get big or cut , what they need to do is get like Dorian. "


sums it up
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 11, 2008, 01:52:40 PM
you mean they need to show up with one arm?
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 11, 2008, 01:52:59 PM
Right massive and hard as nails that's Dorian's calling card

Bill Dobbins on Yates at the 1995 Olympia

As Weider photographer Bill Dobbins so succinctly put it as Yates strutted his stuff : " I have never seen such muscle development on a human being. The other guys sit around backstage talking about whether to get big or cut , what they need to do is get like Dorian. "


sums it up

Too bad they all tried the size game and ended up looking like garbage. Tried the condition game and looked like dots next to him....tried filling their bodies with synthol and ended up doing stupid interviews outing the world...
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 01:54:03 PM
you mean they need to show up with one arm?

or no calves , no let me amend that injected calves
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 11, 2008, 01:55:26 PM
or no calves , no let me amend that injected calves and gyno
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 01:56:53 PM
Too bad they all tried the size game and ended up looking like garbage. Tried the condition game and looked like dots next to him....tried filling their bodies with synthol and ended up doing stupid interviews outing the world...

lmfao great post , they ALL tried to play the mass game the difference between Yates and them is he could maintain his muscle hardness up to weights of 280-285 pounds some guys like Shawn Ray webt from 205 to 215 and his conditioning suffered for it , this is one area Dorian was exceptional at
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 01:58:43 PM


Mr Olympia with breasts lol
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 11, 2008, 01:59:19 PM
lmfao great post , they ALL tried to play the mass game the difference between Yates and them is he could maintain his muscle hardness up to weights of 280-285 pounds some guys like Shawn Ray webt from 205 to 215 and his conditioning suffered for it , this is one area Dorian was exceptional at

dorian played the size game just like everyone else has, and, like everyone else, he suffered for it:
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 11, 2008, 02:00:00 PM
Mr Olympia with breasts lol

Mr. Olympia with twigs LOL
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 11, 2008, 02:00:16 PM
lmfao great post , they ALL tried to play the mass game the difference between Yates and them is he could maintain his muscle hardness up to weights of 280-285 pounds some guys like Shawn Ray webt from 205 to 215 and his conditioning suffered for it , this is one area Dorian was exceptional at
MS Olympia!!!

I mean I like Shawn Ray and Kevin... I'm also a huge Ronnie fan but noone could/can match Dorian for size/conditioning.....

"He has only one arm" Wow take the olympia and give it to the man with no back!! Idiots!
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 02:01:38 PM
dorian played the size game just like everyone else has, and, like everyone else, he suffered for it:

No he didn't he's still massive with insane muscle hardness in 1997 his conditioning wasn't the problem it was tears , he was 274 pounds and still hard as nails

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: MONSTER_TRICEPS on September 11, 2008, 02:02:08 PM
Peak Coleman = untouchable, period.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 02:02:59 PM
Peak Coleman = untouchable, period.

MONSTER_TRICEPS = blanket statement , period.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: m8 on September 11, 2008, 02:03:27 PM
Mr Olympia with breasts lol

The gyno ruined everything in 1998 IMO.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 11, 2008, 02:04:00 PM
and why did dorian tear so bad?

lifting far too heavy in the quest of even more unnecessary size...

you miss the point: playing the size game in the first place is PART of why he tore everything to shit.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 11, 2008, 02:04:20 PM
MONSTER_TRICEPS = blanket statement , period.
LOL Coleman was great...but he had serious flaws.

Couldn't control his waist. Injected calves. Gyno. Bad forearms. Long torso.

Dorian had bicep tear...
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 02:04:51 PM
Mr. Olympia with twigs LOL

Mr Olympia with twigs
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: m8 on September 11, 2008, 02:05:41 PM
Couldn't control his waist. Injected calves. Gyno. Bad forearms. Long torso.

So true...
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 11, 2008, 02:06:15 PM
The gyno ruined everything in 1998 IMO.

funny, most everyone says the same thing about dorian's torn bi in 1994, 1995, 1996 AND 1997 LOL
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 02:06:19 PM
and why did dorian tear so bad?

lifting far too heavy in the quest of even more unnecessary size...

you miss the point: playing the size game in the first place is PART of why he tore everything to shit.

He never ego lifted that wasn't the issue and the reason he tore everything to shit was ' minor ' problems he ignored that became bigger problems

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 02:06:58 PM
funny, most everyone says the same thing about dorian's torn bi in 1994, 1995, 1996 AND 1997 LOL

The judges didn't and ONLY they matter  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 11, 2008, 02:08:01 PM
The judges didn't and ONLY they matter  ;)
LOL 6 sandows later!
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 11, 2008, 02:09:45 PM
The judges didn't and ONLY they matter  ;)

and that is probably why dorian has such a shitty rep physique wise on boards like this and sites like Muscletime:

the judges looked the other way and scored him perfectly when they should not have... :-\ ::)

a tear like that and no drop in points?

on Mars maybe.

should never have happened on planet earth..
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 02:09:59 PM
LOL 6 sandows later!

Wait for the politics excuse , or the Hulkster's fantasy of Joe Weider being gay
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 11, 2008, 02:11:44 PM
Wait for the politics excuse , or the Hulkster's fantasy of Joe Weider being gay

do you agree ND that this should have recieved a perfect score in all rounds, including the 'symmetry' round?


answer yes or no.

don't run and hide like you always do.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 11, 2008, 02:13:05 PM
do you agree ND that this should have recieved a perfect score in all rounds, including the 'symmetry' round?


answer yes or no.

don't run and hide like you always do.
Yes
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 11, 2008, 02:14:26 PM
Yes

you are not ND.

or are you?...lol
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 11, 2008, 02:15:04 PM
you are not ND.

or are you?...lol
LOL Not quite
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 02:16:25 PM
and that is probably why dorian has such a shitty rep physique wise on boards like this and sites like Muscletime:

the judges looked the other way and scored him perfectly when they should not have... :-\ ::)

a tear like that and no drop in points?

on Mars maybe.

should never have happened on planet earth..

Hulkster a lot of people don't like Dorian's physique for preference reasons or bias reasons but that mean he wasn't the clear winner in these contests , his contemporaries marveled at him and they speak very highly of him , especially Ronnie Coleman

and Muscletime has their opinion and they're entitled to it , just because its a site doesn't mean they're right I could post a million quotes saying Ronnie should have lost in 2000/2001/2002 it doesn't make it true and you're always stuck with this problem Dorian should have lost , but Ronnie shouldn't have lol

Dorian had one bicep shorter than the other the judges said it made no OVERALL difference and it really doesn't with maybe the sole exception of the front double biceps shot o.k. if you wanna knitpick but you people need an angle and have one but thats it , Ronnie won every single one of his Olympia titles with essentially NO calves to speak of , so once again you're stuck , its bad for Dorian to have one bicep shorter than the other but quote ok for Ronnie to have TWO horrible calves  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: m8 on September 11, 2008, 02:17:42 PM
d0nny2600 knows his bodybuilding.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 11, 2008, 02:21:07 PM
Ronnie deserved his olympias...Dorian also deserved his olympias. Who would you have given Dorians titles to?
Kevin with shit conditioning?
Nasser with no back?
Shawn with no size?
Flex with Ninjas?
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 02:25:41 PM
do you agree ND that this should have recieved a perfect score in all rounds, including the 'symmetry' round?


answer yes or no.

don't run and hide like you always do.

Yes I do and I'll explain why and this is where your ignorance come into play and why?

all rounds are physique rounds

in every single pose the judge muscular bulk , muscle density , muscle dryness , muscle balance , muscle proportion , posing & presentation , torso length , arm length , arm length in relation to the torso , proportion from muscle to muscle , leg length , leg length in relation to the torso , upper & lower balance , height , when all of these things are considered yes Dorian deserved straight firsts in 1995

and you're so full of shit I never once ran from ANYTHING anyone has posted ever , I have some of the longest most detailed and intricate postings on this topic so stop projecting
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 02:26:29 PM
you are not ND.

or are you?...lol

You wanna go down that road?  ;) I'll crush you even more.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: johnny1 on September 11, 2008, 02:32:08 PM
You wanna go down that road?  ;) I'll crush you even more.
HAhaha..ND so smart its not funny :) :) :)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 02:33:54 PM
HAhaha..ND so smart its not funny :) :) :)

Great first post ! you're the man  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 11, 2008, 02:40:07 PM
ND wants to spread his man love around... :-X
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: johnny1 on September 11, 2008, 02:49:02 PM
Great first post ! you're the man  ;)
I don,t know why the others try it on ND ive been reading this board for the past 2yrs and 99% of what you have written is CORRECT...Dorian yates (in his prime) was more complete than Ronnie Coleman thats a fact why do people go on and on about 1 bicep tear, the judges (the people that matter) didnot seem to think that one small flaw was enough to mark dorian down to number 2,3, or 10th, he was so dominent because he was more BALANCED than the rest..that simple and people seem to forget Dorian beat a PRIME shawn ray, a PRIME paul dillet, a PRIME kevin levrone, a PRIME nasser, a prime FLEX WHEELER, and on it goes, Ronnie didnot beat all those greats in their PRIMES...not a knock on RONNIE just a fact.. as great as Ronnie was i always thought his CALVES were more a liability than DORIANS one bicep..but the judges didn,t seem to think so and thats what matters....DORIAN YATES (in his prime) vs RONNIE COLEMAN (in his prime) = one guy COMPLETE the other MISSING ONE SET OF CALVES.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 11, 2008, 02:50:49 PM
I don,t know why the others try it on ND ive been reading this board for the past 2yrs and 99% of what you have written is CORRECT...Dorian yates (in his prime) was more complete than Ronnie Coleman thats a fact why do people go on and on about 1 bicep tear, the judges (the people that matter) didnot seem to think that one small flaw was enough to mark dorian down to number 2,3, or 10th, he was so dominent because he was more BALANCED than the rest..that simple and people seem to forget Dorian beat a PRIME shawn ray, a PRIME paul dillet, a PRIME kevin levrone, a PRIME nasser, a prime FLEX WHEELER, and on it goes, Ronnie didnot beat all those greats in their PRIMES...not a knock on RONNIE just a fact.. as great as Ronnie was i always thought his CALVES were more a liability than DORIANS one bicep..but the judges didn,t seem to think so and thats what matters....DORIAN YATES (in his prime) vs RONNIE COLEMAN (in his prime) = one guy COMPLETE the other MISSING ONE SET OF CALVES.
Why does nobody mention Ronnies missing lat from 07'?
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: qiniz on September 11, 2008, 02:57:26 PM
ND wants to spread his man love around... :-X

you guys really hate each other, dont you?

question: do you ever wake-up and realize what you two are doing?
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: johnny1 on September 11, 2008, 03:05:09 PM
Why does nobody mention Ronnies missing lat from 07'?

In 2007 the big guy was missing a lat, tricep and a leg.........
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 11, 2008, 03:15:24 PM
Why does nobody mention Ronnies missing lat from 07'?


probably because it was at the end of his career..

dorian tore his arm very early on..and the judges didn't care  ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 04:03:45 PM
you guys really hate each other, dont you?

question: do you ever wake-up and realize what you two are doing?

I don't hate him or Ronnie , its not my style

although I do enjoy when one of the best contest photographers in the history of bodybuilding called him a ' retard ' that was classic
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 11, 2008, 04:05:59 PM
or no calves , no let me amend that injected calves

Prove it. The pics haven't.

This is real.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 11, 2008, 04:07:35 PM
Prove it. The pics haven't.

agreed.

the idiot dorian nuthuggers are quick to assume ronnie injected his calves, yet there is not a single shread of visual evidence anywhere to support this bullshit 'theory'

 ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 11, 2008, 04:09:25 PM
The judges didn't and ONLY they matter  ;)

Quote
LOL 6 sandows later!

Epic IFBB ball-worship.

I give you the 6-time IFBB approved winner with unblemished record..
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 04:11:23 PM
Prove it. The pics haven't.

This is real.

done
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 04:12:58 PM
Epic IFBB ball-worship.

I give you the 6-time IFBB approved winner with unblemished record..


Same contest ONE picture proves NOTHING but you fear
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 04:13:54 PM
agreed.

the idiot dorian nuthuggers are quick to assume ronnie injected his calves, yet there is not a single shread of visual evidence anywhere to support this bullshit 'theory'

 ::)

yeah just like there was no evidence for enhanced screencaps too lol
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 11, 2008, 04:14:00 PM
done

No synthol in either pic, only between your ears.

It only took this genius 1,300 pages on the truce thread to come up with this theory bwahahahaahhaa
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 11, 2008, 04:14:41 PM
done

totally disproven:

they didn't disappear - they were never there to begin with.

2003 at his biggest and they looked just as bad. If he had injected them, you would notice the size increase easily..

fucking OWNED..as  always

nice pathetic try though.. ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 04:18:13 PM
No synthol in either pic, only between your ears.

It only took this genius 1,300 pages on the truce thread to come up with this theory bwahahahaahhaa

I didn't say sythol  ;) I said injected big difference

calves are one of the hardest muscles to grow and when you do get them to grow they don't disappear very easily if all natural , Ronnie's guesposing in this pic and his calves are MISSING he's well over 275 as well thats the proof his calves would never be this small if they weren't injected with something especially compared to earlier showings now couple that with NO development what so ever and its very safe to assume his calves are NOT natural , Shawn Ray had small high calves but the gastrocnemious showed excellent development and separation for a reason
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 04:20:55 PM
totally disproven:

they didn't disappear - they were never there to begin with.

2003 at his biggest and they looked just as bad. If he had injected them, you would notice the size increase easily..

fucking OWNED..as  always

nice pathetic try though.. ::)


lmfao thanks for proving me correct , you constantly backfired with EVERYTHING thete is an OBVIOUS difference between the two pictures in calve size and if they were natural there wouldn't be
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 11, 2008, 05:42:24 PM

lmfao thanks for proving me correct , you constantly backfired with EVERYTHING thete is an OBVIOUS difference between the two pictures in calve size and if they were natural there wouldn't be

 ::)

you are saying that because ronnie's calves were a bit smaller in 2006 vs 2003 that they are injected?

LOL what the fuck?

parts of ronnie's whole body had deteriorated by that point compared to 2003..for example his triceps/biceps etc were not up to their former standards..

 ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 11, 2008, 05:50:20 PM
Its mind bogoling that these tards post up pics of dorians contest shape back or front double bis like it dosent look like shit, with bis that peak lower than the front delts. and again big ass calves DO NOT make up for small torn shitily shaped all elbow arms.
I guess love(man love) can blind a man  :-*
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 05:51:18 PM
::)

you are saying that because ronnie's calves were a bit smaller in 2006 vs 2003 that they are injected?

LOL what the fuck?

parts of ronnie's whole body had deteriorated by that point compared to 2003..for example his triceps/biceps etc were not up to their former standards..

 ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

Hulkster they're obviously more than a bit smaller and they didn't deteriorate due to damage and you know that and did you miss the part where I said along with being noticeably smaller they lack development & separation? of course you did by like all valid points YOU gloss over its a sign of fear
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 11, 2008, 05:57:48 PM

2001 AC vs 2003 olympia vs 2007 Olympia

where is the evidence of injections? ::)

where is the big increase in size that goes along with it?

 ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 11, 2008, 05:59:45 PM
like Pumpster has said, none of the pics has EVER suggested that ronnie's calves were injected.

ND and his bitches pulled that theory out of their asses, after removing dorian's cock of course... :-X
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 06:00:56 PM

2001 AC vs 2003 olympia vs 2007 gp show.

where is the evidence of injections? ::)

where is the big increase in size that goes along with it?

 ::)

Hulkster your reliance of photos shows your ignorance , they're obviously two very different pictures with Ronnie being closer to the camera in the 01 and further away in 03 and there is a noticeable difference still , if they were both side-by-side the difference would be more dramatic and ironically both years he shows no development & separation of the gastrocnemious inner & outter heads and how what usually obscures that?  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 11, 2008, 06:02:19 PM
look at that the excuses are coming in already... ::)

why don't you get some real proof before pulling accusations out your ass? ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 06:02:34 PM
like Pumpster has said, none of the pics has EVER suggested that ronnie's calves were injected.

ND and his bitches pulled that theory out of their asses, after removing dorian's cock of course... :-X

LMFAO quoting pumpster that's a big mistake  ;) I disagree see above

just like the theory the screencaps weren't enhanced that's a closed case I'm sure this will be at some point , I don't believe his calves are all muscle
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 06:04:01 PM
look at that the excuses are coming in already... ::)

why don't you get some real proof before pulling accusations out your ass? ::)

That's your angle stick to it  ;)

proof is his calves change size despite staying around the same weight plus he lacks any development & separation again what would obscure that?
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 11, 2008, 06:09:49 PM

just like the theory the screencaps weren't enhanced that's a closed case I'm sure this will be at some point , I don't believe his calves are all muscle

You must be VERY smart to have taken 1,300 truce pages to come up with this injection brilliance, coupled with absolutely no evidence. When did the poor lighting, bad angles excuses etc. become passe?

Please let me know what was injected here?
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 06:12:24 PM
You must be VERY smart to have taken 1,300 truce pages to come up with this injection brilliance, coupled with absolutely no evidence. When did the poor lighting, bad angles excuses etc. become passe?

No evidence , again did you miss the part where I said his calves lack any development & separation of the gastrocnimous inner & outter head , of course you didn't you can't can't offer a reasonable explanation for this , what would obscure this?

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Iceman1981 on September 11, 2008, 06:14:17 PM
WTF? Is this shyt still going on?
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 06:15:47 PM
WTF? Is this shyt still going on?

Like you didn't know  ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 11, 2008, 06:16:30 PM
You must be VERY smart to have taken 1,300 truce pages to come up with this injection brilliance, coupled with absolutely no evidence. When did the poor lighting, bad angles excuses etc. become passe?

Please let me know what was injected here?

 ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 11, 2008, 06:44:38 PM
You must be VERY smart to have taken 1,300 truce pages to come up with this injection brilliance, coupled with absolutely no evidence. When did the poor lighting, bad angles excuses etc. become passe?

Please let me know what was injected here?
hahahhahahhahahahahhahahaha
hahahahahahhahahaahhahah aha
hahahahahhaahhahahhahahh a
I have never seen that before
holy crap  ;D
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 11, 2008, 06:51:24 PM
dorian played the size game just like everyone else has, and, like everyone else, he suffered for it:
what the fuck?
his arms look fake
a human arm can't look that terrible
small and tiny and out of shape  ???
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 11, 2008, 06:54:28 PM
Its mind bogoling that these tards post up pics of dorians contest shape back or front double bis like it dosent look like shit, with bis that peak lower than the front delts. and again big ass calves DO NOT make up for small torn shitily shaped all elbow arms.
I guess love(man love) can blind a man  :-*


hahahahaha
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 11, 2008, 06:57:36 PM

hahahahaha
yates looks like a homeless man lost and who ended up on a bodybuilding stage  :-\
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 11, 2008, 07:33:11 PM
yates looks like a homeless man lost and who ended up on a bodybuilding stage  :-\

ROFL it's true.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 11, 2008, 08:34:31 PM
ROFL it's true.
hahahahhahaha
he looks like he is about to fuck a ghost  ;D
holding the ghost by the love handles, now bring "him" back fast and put it in dorian hahahahahhahah
or maybe kevin levrone is infront of him and he knows Kevin is better than he could ever be  :D
and the face.....classic yates  ::)
like his training partner says "Push iiiiiiit [in] Mr. YATES"  :D
LMAO
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 12, 2008, 03:14:15 AM
You must be VERY smart to have taken 1,300 truce pages to come up with this injection brilliance, coupled with absolutely no evidence. When did the poor lighting, bad angles excuses etc. become passe?

Please let me know what was injected here?

  This picture is from 1994, and you hand-picked the pic that best suits your purpose. I could just as easily post a pic of Ronnie from the 2004 Olympia and then say that this proves something. Look Dexter Jackson pointing out Ronnie's gut. ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 12, 2008, 03:40:09 AM
hahahahhahaha
he looks like he is about to fuck a ghost  ;D
holding the ghost by the love handles, now bring "him" back fast and put it in dorian hahahahahhahah
or maybe kevin levrone is infront of him and he knows Kevin is better than he could ever be  :D
and the face.....classic yates  ::)
like his training partner says "Push iiiiiiit [in] Mr. YATES"  :D
LMAO

Hey towel head...why did you run away from my question?
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 12, 2008, 03:42:10 AM
WTF? Is this shyt still going on?

because ND is a desperate loser... ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 12, 2008, 03:43:45 AM
because ND is a desperate loser... ::)
And you are the model getbigger? lmao


"Ronnie is better cause...umm cause I said so"

Brilliant post!
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 12, 2008, 03:45:34 AM
And you are the model getbigger? lmao


"Ronnie is better cause...umm cause I said so"

Brilliant post!

well, I don't come up with bullshit theories about injections with absolutely NO EVIDENCE to back them up...

 ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 12, 2008, 03:49:04 AM
well, I don't come up with bullshit theories about injections with absolutely NO EVIDENCE to back them up...

 ::)

Ronnie injected his calves...that easy for everyone to see.

Now you are missing my point. I'm a huge Ronnie fan. I'm also a huge Yates fan. I am unbiased when it comes to it. I think Ronnie, against his competition, was the best. Same goes for Yates. However - Ronnie v Dorian = Dorian winning because Ronnie lacked a full bodypart and would come in soft. Noone on the O stage comes in as hard as Yates anymore. Simple as that. Ronnie was able to come in soft at the expense of size and dominate...Yates came in with size and hardness and dominated.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 12, 2008, 03:50:31 AM
Hulkster they're obviously more than a bit smaller and they didn't deteriorate due to damage and you know that and did you miss the part where I said along with being noticeably smaller they lack development & separation? of course you did by like all valid points YOU gloss over its a sign of fear

so, are you saying that because ronnie's calves hardly had seperation that they have been injected from 1991 all they way up til now?

tell is all ND: dorian's arms have no seperation either in most shots, that must mean they they are injected too. do you agree?:
 ::)

according to ND, the lack of cuts must mean that dorian's arms are injected too: ::)

can you believe this shit? LOL ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 12, 2008, 03:51:49 AM
Quote
Ronnie injected his calves...that easy for everyone to see.


well, dorian must have injected his arms then according to you idiots..

after all, all the same 'evidence' can be used LOL

they changed size drastically and had near zero cuts from the front in most shots.

LOL ::)

can you not see how stupid this is? ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 12, 2008, 03:54:38 AM
well, dorian must have injected his arms then according to you idiots..

after all, all the same 'evidence' can be used LOL

they changed size drastically and had near zero cuts from the front in most shots.

LOL ::)

can you not see how stupid this is? ::)

Ok - Dorian injected his arms...Good argument  ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: bodybuilder1234 on September 12, 2008, 04:39:04 AM
He is that whats Kevin's main problem finding the perfect balance between size AND condition

you usually got two versions of Kevin the big soft Kevin or the small ripped one. but that's what you get when you're a part-time bodybuilder

Kevin managed to find perfect balance between the two in 2000 and 2002
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 12, 2008, 04:40:43 AM
Kevin managed to find perfect balance between the two in 2000 and 2002
Yet no Olympia for poor oily Kev
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 12, 2008, 09:46:20 AM
so, are you saying that because ronnie's calves hardly had seperation that they have been injected from 1991 all they way up til now?

tell is all ND: dorian's arms have no seperation either in most shots, that must mean they they are injected too. do you agree?:
 ::)

according to ND, the lack of cuts must mean that dorian's arms are injected too: ::)

can you believe this shit? LOL ::)

His arms didn't lack separation and detail that's your angle and you post a strawman picture as ' proof ' you're to simple you are posting a bad pic proves nothing except your desperation , I wont bother posting pics to the contrary because we know your full of shit.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 12, 2008, 09:47:40 AM
Kevin managed to find perfect balance between the two in 2000 and 2002

not really in 2000 he was small and cut , same in 2002 but his legs were almost nonexistent
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 12, 2008, 10:24:38 AM
not really in 2000 he was small and cut , same in 2002 but his legs were almost nonexistent
No he was still pretty big, just small next to ronnie...ronnie faced the biggest levrone versions like 98, 99 and made him look small a feat dorian could only do on the scale, his back can be big ass hell but that does not make up for him getting dwarfed on delts arms and chest thickness.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 12, 2008, 01:17:43 PM
No he was still pretty big, just small next to ronnie...ronnie faced the biggest levrone versions like 98, 99 and made him look small a feat dorian could only do on the scale, his back can be big ass hell but that does not make up for him getting dwarfed on delts arms and chest thickness.

You're such a fan-boy lol and Levrone was 249 pounds in 1998 NOT among his biggest , error number 1 , error number 2 he didn't make him look small either , and Dorian crushed them all it doesn't matter if Levrone was comparable in size when its at the expense of density & dryness , soft-size is NOT substitute for density which I'm sure you know it part of the judging criteria lol

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 12, 2008, 01:50:25 PM
You're such a fan-boy lol and Levrone was 249 pounds in 1998 NOT among his biggest , error number 1 , error number 2 he didn't make him look small either , and Dorian crushed them all it doesn't matter if Levrone was comparable in size when its at the expense of density & dryness , soft-size is NOT substitute for density which I'm sure you know it part of the judging criteria lol


when is this crap gonna end? Yates had the ugliest body of all Mr. Olympias
First you say Yates looked better than Coleman  >:(
then you say Yates looked better than Levrone (who looked better than coleman)  >:( >:( >:(
whats next?  ???
you gonna say Yates looked better than Schwarzenegger?  >:(
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 12, 2008, 01:53:46 PM
when is this crap gonna end? Yates had the ugliest body of all Mr. Olympias
First you say Yates looked better than Coleman  >:(
then you say Yates looked better than Levrone (who looked better than coleman)  >:( >:( >:(
whats next?  ???
you gonna say Yates looked better than Schwarzenegger?  >:(

When did I say he ' looked better ' I said he meets the criteria better big difference

it doesn't matter if his physique is ugly
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 12, 2008, 01:56:39 PM
When did I say he ' looked better ' I said he meets the criteria better big difference

it doesn't matter if his physique is ugly
omg dude, why are you trying to convince everyone dorian yates was the best?
you have talked about it for THOUSANDS of pages have you not changed your mind?  ???
we all have our opinions and kevin levrone owned dorian yates  ;D
now me and you can start another thread discussing kevin levrone VS dorian yates if you're tired of doing it against ronnie coleman  :D
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 12, 2008, 02:01:01 PM
omg dude, why are you trying to convince everyone dorian yates was the best?
you have talked about it for THOUSANDS of pages have you not changed your mind?  ???
we all have our opinions and kevin levrone owned dorian yates  ;D
now me and you can start another thread discussing kevin levrone VS dorian yates if you're tired of doing it against ronnie coleman  :D


The difference between Dorian VS Ronnie is Ronnie could beat Dorian at his best , Levrone never stood a chance lol
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 12, 2008, 02:14:25 PM
The difference between Dorian VS Ronnie is Ronnie could beat Dorian at his best , Levrone never stood a chance lol
hahhaahahahhaahhaha you're a funny guy ::)
all yates had was back and calves
that's all he had
kevin owned him in everything
oh and here is kevin owning dorian like the little bitch he was in a back double bicep  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 12, 2008, 02:21:05 PM
the fact that Dorian Yates beat Kevin Levrone with no left bicep, chicken shit arms
flat chest, little kid shoulders and legs and with a HUGE GROWTH HORMONE GUT
is just RIDICULOUS and STUPID  >:(
here is a picture, Yates.....OWNED 8)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 12, 2008, 02:26:50 PM
here is yates attempting it and looking like a homeless man   ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 12, 2008, 02:29:34 PM
hahhaahahahhaahhaha you're a funny guy ::)
all yates had was back and calves
that's all he had
kevin owned him in everything
oh and here is kevin owning dorian like the little bitch he was in a back double bicep  ;)


Whoa multiple Dorian-induced meltdown lol

I'm sure you believe everything you just typed but its in direct contrast of reality
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 12, 2008, 02:31:19 PM
Whoa multiple Dorian-induced meltdown lol

I'm sure you believe everything you just typed but its in direct contrast of reality
you obviously have not seen me melt down if you think that was a multiple meltdown  ;D
there is the picture and kevin is owning dorian in the back double bi......what's there to see?  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 12, 2008, 02:33:11 PM
you obviously have not seen me melt down if you think that was a multiple meltdown  ;D
there is the picture and kevin is owning dorian in the back double bi......what's there to see?  ;)

Again he's not owning Dorian at all and if he did he would have won .
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 12, 2008, 02:38:32 PM
Again he's not owning Dorian at all and if he did he would have won .
you're acting like you don't know how fucked up the judging at Mr. O is......
so you're saying that Jay Cutler was actually better than Victor Martinez last year at the olympia, thats why he won?  ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 12, 2008, 02:45:24 PM
you're acting like you don't know how fucked up the judging at Mr. O is......
so you're saying that Jay Cutler was actually better than Victor Martinez last year at the olympia, thats why he won?  ::)

13 individual judges ALL came to the same conclusion without each others knowledge so spare me the politics excuses , it's been done.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 12, 2008, 02:50:14 PM
13 individual judges ALL came to the same conclusion without each others knowledge so spare me the politics excuses , it's been done.
LOL
so tell me how does a man with a torn bicep and a bloated gut beat all the greats?  :)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 12, 2008, 03:00:53 PM
LOL
so tell me how does a man with a torn bicep and a bloated gut beat all the greats?  :)

density , dryness , size , balance & proportion , posing & presentation thats how
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 12, 2008, 03:15:16 PM
Ok - Dorian injected his arms...Good argument  ::)

exactly - you understand my point then.

arguing ronnie inject his calves is just as stupid as arguing dorian injected his arms

after all, the 'evidence' used by the nuthuggers is the same for ronnie as it is for dorian..

and you don't see anyone arguing dorian injected his arms.

although he probably should have lol
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 12, 2008, 03:19:40 PM
you're acting like you don't know how fucked up the judging at Mr. O is......
so you're saying that Jay Cutler was actually better than Victor Martinez last year at the olympia, thats why he won?  ::)

he doesn't.

he thinks that because 13 judges all came to the same conclusion that they must have been right.

this of course, is totaly ingnorant of the reality of this sport. what Uncle Joe says Goes - no matter what.

just ask Laura Creavalle after the 1994 Ms. Olympia LOL
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 12, 2008, 03:23:23 PM
exactly - you understand my point then.

arguing ronnie inject his calves is just as stupid as arguing dorian injected his arms

after all, the 'evidence' used by the nuthuggers is the same for ronnie as it is for dorian..

and you don't see anyone arguing dorian injected his arms.

although he probably should have lol

No it most certainly is not the same you are hands down the biggest idiot I've ever come across no wonder why Kevin Horton called you a ' retard '

Dorian's arms are clearly defined , you posted the worse possible picture of Dorian as proof which is retard , Ronnie's calves lack any development and again they fluctuate in size even at the same bodyweights what does that tell you?
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 12, 2008, 03:25:54 PM
he doesn't.

he thinks that because 13 judges all came to the same conclusion that they must have been right.

this of course, is totaly ingnorant of the reality of this sport. what Uncle Joe says Goes - no matter what.

just ask Laura Creavalle after the 1994 Ms. Olympia LOL

That's all you have ' politics '  but they don't apply to Ronnie 2000/2001/2002 etc , etc  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 12, 2008, 03:27:04 PM
Quote
Ronnie's calves lack any development and again they fluctuate in size even at the same bodyweights what does that tell you?

proof please. idiot.

besides, dorian's arms were noticably bigger in 93 than in 95 and he was only 2 pounds lighter in 95.

he must have injected them in 93, according to your retarded logic.. ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 12, 2008, 03:29:15 PM
proof please. idiot.

I'm still waiting for proof that I claimed ALL 1999 screencaps were enhanced  ;)

and please post your proof that the judges tilted a contest in Yates' favor at the behest of Joe Weider  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 12, 2008, 03:34:39 PM
Quote
and please post your proof that the judges tilted a contest in Yates' favor at the behest of Joe Weider 

well, any judge that is ignorant enough to say that this injury had no overall effect is clearly influenced by something.

and that something could only be one thing: the IFBB:
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 12, 2008, 03:38:17 PM
when is this crap gonna end? Yates had the ugliest body of all Mr. Olympias

He's known as the Columbu of the 90s. Equally deserving, equally torso and no arms. :o

Superb example of keg ownage there he looks tiny LOL
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 12, 2008, 03:39:58 PM
well, any judge that is ignorant enough to say that this injury had no overall effect is clearly influenced by something.

and that something could only be one thing: the IFBB:

I'm waiting for your proof
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 12, 2008, 03:40:16 PM
Also known as the kovaks brothers.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 12, 2008, 03:40:50 PM
its funny how dorian gets owned in probably close to 70% of all his contest pics, yet he was scored perfectly in all of them LOL

 ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 12, 2008, 03:41:01 PM
He's known as the Columbu of the 90s. Equally deserving, equally torso and no arms. :o

Superb example of keg ownage there he looks tiny LOL

He's known to people who aren't racist as the most dominant bodybuilder of the 1990s

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 12, 2008, 03:41:46 PM
its funny how dorian gets owned in probably close to 70% of all his contest pics, yet he was scored perfectly in all of them LOL

 ::)

have you ever noticed your opinions are always directly the opposite of the judges? what does that tell you?  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Earl1972 on September 12, 2008, 03:41:53 PM


it doesn't matter if his physique is ugly

gee i wonder why bodybuilding lost so many fans ::)

E
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 12, 2008, 03:42:44 PM
I'm waiting for your proof

that is your proof.

how the fuck can any judge say that and still be said to be competent? ::)

that judge should have been taken off the panel.

oh wait - he was told to think/say that.

your proof is right in front of you. you are just too stupid to see it.

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 12, 2008, 03:43:25 PM
gee i wonder why bodybuilding lost so many fans ::)

E

I'll tell you why because they can't relate thats why , its a fringe sport and always will be , going by your logic Natural contest should be insanely popular but they're not why?
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 12, 2008, 03:43:45 PM
Quote
it doesn't matter if his physique is ugly

you can see how little this guy really knows..

he throws all hint of aesthetics out the window when it comes to dorian.. ::)

too bad ronnie had the mass with class..
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 12, 2008, 03:44:49 PM
that is your proof.

how the fuck can any judge say that and still be said to be competent? ::)

that judge should have been taken off the panel.

oh wait - he was told to think/say that.

your proof is right in front of you. you are just too stupid to see it.



Yeah thats what you have excuses , excuses , excuses . 13 individual people all came to the same conclusion , that speaks volumes
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 12, 2008, 03:46:24 PM
you can see how little this guy really knows..

he throws all hint of aesthetics out the window when it comes to dorian.. ::)

too bad ronnie had the mass with class..

NO the judges threw out aesthetics in favor of Yates' overall package

I know more than you , you still can't figue out how contests are judged and are always in direct opposition with them that means you don't know what you're talking about
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Earl1972 on September 12, 2008, 03:47:06 PM
I'll tell you why because they can't relate thats why , its a fringe sport and always will be , going by your logic Natural contest should be insanely popular but they're not why?

look at a large amount of posters here ND

the majority say they hate the body's of today but like the physiques of the past

the judging criteria that chose dorian caused bodybuilding to lose the fans that supported the sport

E
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 12, 2008, 03:49:50 PM
density , dryness , size , balance & proportion , posing & presentation thats how
first.....
BALANCE AND PROPORTION
dorian yates had no balance and proportion
he had NO ARMS or shoulders
and his calves were bigger than his quads ....so wtf
"man with no left bicep"  :D

POSING AND PRESENTATION
do you really think that his posing was better than Levrone? one of the best presenters of ALL TIME?
have you seen both men pose?

Size
Levrone owned yates in pretty much all bodyparts in terms of size

dryness and density
.......hmmm.........agai n levrone kicked dorians ass here too

you just can't accept the fact that another bodybuilder can beat yates so easily
why are you stuck to yates's balls?
now you are just being a complete fucking moron dumb........ >:(

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 12, 2008, 03:51:03 PM
look at a large amount of posters here ND

the majority say they hate the body's of today but like the physiques of the past

the judging criteria that chose dorian caused bodybuilding to lose the fans that supported the sport

E
the ugliest Mr. O physique of all time  >:(
that asshole destroyed bodybuilding
and he introduced he huge growth hormone gut  >:( >:(
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 12, 2008, 03:51:34 PM
first.....
BALANCE AND PROPORTION
dorian yates had no balance and proportion
he had NO ARMS or shoulders
and his calves were bigger than his quads ....so wtf
"man with no left bicep"  :D

POSING AND PRESENTATION
do you really think that his posing was better than Levrone? one of the best presenters of ALL TIME?
have you seen both men pose?

Size
Levrone owned yates in pretty much all bodyparts in terms of size

dryness and density
.......hmmm.........agai n levrone kicked dorians ass here too

you just can't accept the fact that another bodybuilder can beat yates so easily
why are you stuck to yates's balls?
now you are just being a complete fucking moron dumb........ >:(



well said!
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 12, 2008, 03:58:10 PM
look at a large amount of posters here ND

the majority say they hate the body's of today but like the physiques of the past

the judging criteria that chose dorian caused bodybuilding to lose the fans that supported the sport

E

This isn't American Idol the fans don't choose who wins  ;)

the Judges crush the fans they know what they're doing the fans don't
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 12, 2008, 04:07:33 PM
have you ever noticed your opinions are always directly the opposite of the judges? what does that tell you?  ;)

It reminds me that you're an unabashed IFBB ball-washer. :-*
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 12, 2008, 04:08:28 PM
He's known to people who aren't racist as the most dominant bodybuilder of the 1990s



Is that why u almost always choose the white guy?
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Earl1972 on September 12, 2008, 04:22:01 PM
This isn't American Idol the fans don't choose who wins  ;)

the Judges crush the fans they know what they're doing the fans don't

the fans bring in the money ::)

E
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 12, 2008, 05:13:10 PM
the fans bring in the money ::)

E

Nailed it. BB fans = mag sales and supplements that dumbass here doesn't understand after decades heheehehe
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 12, 2008, 05:47:42 PM
Quote
the Judges crush the fans they know what they're doing the fans don't 
 
 

yeah, sure they do... ::)

this sport has demonstrated that this is certainly not always true..
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 12, 2008, 05:57:20 PM
You're such a fan-boy lol and Levrone was 249 pounds in 1998 NOT among his biggest , error number 1 , error number 2 he didn't make him look small either , and Dorian crushed them all it doesn't matter if Levrone was comparable in size when its at the expense of density & dryness , soft-size is NOT substitute for density which I'm sure you know it part of the judging criteria lol


bro youre a fucking idiot, not so big atb 249?, who cares what he weighed dipshit look at that mm, watch the videos of kev in 98 & 99 and see that he looked enormous and ronnie was over all bigger in all body parts and much harder, something that cant be said for the keg. thats the thing with your dumb ass you like to throw around "nonfactual contest weights", "criterias about density", plus quotes by men whom dorian sucked off and vise versa like they really carry a lot of weight yet ignoring the fact that most of the bb's that saw them both backstage see this as a non contest favoring ronnie...and then you justify yourself by adding an "lol" like that makes you seem like your winning the argument when anybody with sense will laugh at you. weight dosent mean shit, kev was a huge bb and dorian was a heavy construction worker with a big ugly back and huge calves. look at his bdb how can anyone who isnt yates himself or his family say that looks good o balanced, all you see is a big back with crap shape between a mean pair of elbows...arms are THE bodybuilding muscle and yates were all elbow, right angle and lighting needing twigs that belong on a 60 year old master bb that would still be rediculed, and his arms were not his only weakness just the biggest and glaring due to their importance in the sport of bodybuilding.
dude you are the biggest delusional fan boy homo on this site and your stupidy is very anoying, yet you call anyone who dissagrees with you a fan boy.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 12, 2008, 05:59:42 PM
bro youre a fucking idiot, not so big atb 249?, who cares what he weighed dipshit look at that mm

dude you are the biggest delusional fan boy homo on this site and your stupidy is very anoying, yet you call anyone who dissagrees with you a fan boy.


BWAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 12, 2008, 06:09:59 PM
BWAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA
1st one, owns himself
2nd one, powned by his superior, even if they turn around  ;)
3rd for some one whom he beat he is really getting his ass handed heavily in this shot, to the point of feeling sorry and ebarrased for yates.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 12, 2008, 06:12:01 PM
ok now I'm fucking pissed  >:(
you cock sucking Dorian Yates fans need to shut the fuck up
you can't defend a bodybuilder who looked liked fucking shit  >:( >:(
there is proof, there is photos, videos
your "favourite" bodybuilder had the most fucking disgusting physique ever and you people should stop kissing his balls  >:( >:( >:(

you just induced another meltdown  ;D
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 12, 2008, 06:34:42 PM
bro youre a fucking idiot, not so big atb 249?, who cares what he weighed dipshit look at that mm, watch the videos of kev in 98 & 99 and see that he looked enormous and ronnie was over all bigger in all body parts and much harder, something that cant be said for the keg. thats the thing with your dumb ass you like to throw around "nonfactual contest weights", "criterias about density", plus quotes by men whom dorian sucked off and vise versa like they really carry a lot of weight yet ignoring the fact that most of the bb's that saw them both backstage see this as a non contest favoring ronnie...and then you justify yourself by adding an "lol" like that makes you seem like your winning the argument when anybody with sense will laugh at you. weight dosent mean shit, kev was a huge bb and dorian was a heavy construction worker with a big ugly back and huge calves. look at his bdb how can anyone who isnt yates himself or his family say that looks good o balanced, all you see is a big back with crap shape between a mean pair of elbows...arms are THE bodybuilding muscle and yates were all elbow, right angle and lighting needing twigs that belong on a 60 year old master bb that would still be rediculed, and his arms were not his only weakness just the biggest and glaring due to their importance in the sport of bodybuilding.
dude you are the biggest delusional fan boy homo on this site and your stupidy is very anoying, yet you call anyone who dissagrees with you a fan boy.

meltdown

next...

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 12, 2008, 06:39:02 PM

Is that why u almost always choose the white guy?

You ever hear me saying Yates should have beaten Haney? NOPE you ever hear me say Jay should have beat Ronnie? NOPE you ever hear me say Arnold should have beaten Sergio in 1969? NOPE . you ever hear me say Gaspari should have beaten Haney? NOPE shall I continue?

thats YOU projecting your racist point of view on to others
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 12, 2008, 06:40:24 PM
It reminds me that you're an unabashed IFBB ball-washer. :-*

and you're an excuse maker its near impossible to fix a contest if you have information to the contrary feel free to share it as we'll all be waiting
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Iceman1981 on September 12, 2008, 08:26:59 PM
Like you didn't know  ::)

Well, actually I didn't know. I'm not on here all day. Some people actually have real jobs.

You've said that you stopped posting in the truce thread because you "claim" you won, but you still post and argue about the same things (Ronnie vs. dorian) in other threads that are the exact same thing as the truce thread.

Sounds stupid, but it's true.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 12, 2008, 10:49:53 PM
meltdown

next...


That and "LOL" are this queer's only rebuttal. No meltdown sweatie pie, just laughing at how dumb and gay one has to be to defend their great white hope to no ends after being tossed around like a prison bitch.
Seriously man, i can only imagine that IRL you must be quite the obnoxious prick that no one likes. Like a kid who's arguments are "so what" or "nah unh", I bet yourbown parents dont like your annoying ass LOL.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 13, 2008, 03:37:50 AM
That and "LOL" are this queer's only rebuttal. No meltdown sweatie pie, just laughing at how dumb and gay one has to be to defend their great white hope to no ends after being tossed around like a prison bitch.
Seriously man, i can only imagine that IRL you must be quite the obnoxious prick that no one likes. Like a kid who's arguments are "so what" or "nah unh", I bet yourbown parents dont like your annoying ass LOL.


hahahahahhahahaa

so true!
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2008, 05:50:54 AM
That and "LOL" are this queer's only rebuttal. No meltdown sweatie pie, just laughing at how dumb and gay one has to be to defend their great white hope to no ends after being tossed around like a prison bitch.
Seriously man, i can only imagine that IRL you must be quite the obnoxious prick that no one likes. Like a kid who's arguments are "so what" or "nah unh", I bet yourbown parents dont like your annoying ass LOL.


meltdown part 2  ;)

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2008, 05:53:42 AM
Well, actually I didn't know. I'm not on here all day. Some people actually have real jobs.

You've said that you stopped posting in the truce thread because you "claim" you won, but you still post and argue about the same things (Ronnie vs. dorian) in other threads that are the exact same thing as the truce thread.

Sounds stupid, but it's true.

yeah you're the only one with a ' real job '  ::)

and these puppies follow me and if I have the desire I'll respond but I did something they can't do walk away  ;) quitting while you're ahead isn't the same as quitting .

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 13, 2008, 10:10:03 AM
meltdown part 2  ;)


Ohh man...keep at it asswipe, thats your best argument in all debates around here. I like the winking face you like to use all the time. Sort of like man who has just corrected someone, only poblem is you get owned and "corrected" here day in and day out, so it really only serves to make you an even bigger laughing stock  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2008, 10:13:06 AM
Ohh man...keep at it asswipe, thats your best argument in all debates around here. I like the winking face you like to use all the time. Sort of like man who has just corrected someone, only poblem is you get owned and "corrected" here day in and day out, so it really only serves to make you an even bigger laughing stock  ;)

I could crush everything you've typed with ease and wit , you're not even worthy of being taken seriously my arguments are cognizant , coherent , factual and articulate anything you have typed , could type or haven't even contemplated I already addressed , corrected and dismissed , keep trying to impress me that's all you can do.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 13, 2008, 10:18:45 AM
You ever hear me saying Yates should have beaten Haney?

Haney's the only clear exception with your racism despite his greatly flawed physique. He's ok with your racism because he's a "polite" negro LOL
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 13, 2008, 10:20:13 AM
Ohh man...keep at it asswipe, thats your best argument in all debates around here. I like the winking face you like to use all the time. Sort of like man who has just corrected someone, only poblem is you get owned and "corrected" here day in and day out, so it really only serves to make you an even bigger laughing stock  ;)

HAHA bump for the truth bro. She thinks this is really witty.

Notice also she never denies the constant IFBB ball-licking and reverence for judges in assuming that all contest are fair while being entirely unable to explain some decisions.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2008, 10:21:50 AM
Haney's the only clear exception with your racism despite his greatly flawed physique. He's ok with your racism because he's a "polite" negro LOL

lmfao there are NO excetion with racism you dolt

you're to simple
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 13, 2008, 10:23:01 AM
lmfao there are NO excetion with racism you dolt


Massive ebonics on display during this meltdown bwahahahaahaha
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2008, 10:23:37 AM
HAHA bump for the truth bro.

Notice also she never denies the constant IFBB ball-licking and reverence for judges in assuming that all contest are fair while being entirely unable to explain some decisions.

I've explained to you that contests are near impossible to fix if you have proof to the contrary feel free to share it until then I'll just laugh at your expired race card always crying when the white man beats your ebony heros
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 13, 2008, 10:32:54 AM
Ohh man...keep at it asswipe, thats your best argument in all debates around here. I like the winking face you like to use all the time. Sort of like man who has just corrected someone, only poblem is you get owned and "corrected" here day in and day out, so it really only serves to make you an even bigger laughing stock  ;)

  Dude, just because you shave your body hair doesen't mean that you're now a Human and not an ape. You should be locked in a cage at the zoo judging by the level of intelligence you show in your posts. :-\ :-X

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 13, 2008, 10:34:33 AM
I've explained to you that contests are near impossible to fix if you have proof to the contrary feel free to share it until then I'll just laugh at your expired race card always crying when the white man beats your ebony heros
Not saying contests are fixed but who gives a shit what you explain...like you're some sort of bodybuilding authority.
BTW monster dictionary.com usage on your last post, really impressive    ::) and i doubt that you have more than a GED, simply due to the fact that your IQ must be dangerously low as evident by your love fueled defence for the train wreck that was the perfect score recieving yates...yeah contest are imposible to fix or manipulate, yates had a perfect physique :-\ counter argument for that: any photo of a contest yates  ;).
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2008, 10:36:22 AM
Not saying contests are fixed but who gives a shit what you explain...like you're some sort of bodybuilding authority.
BTW monster dictionary.com usage on your last post, really impressive    ::) and i doubt that you have more than a GED, simply due to the fact that your IQ must be dangerously low as evident by your love fueled defence for the train wreck that was the perfect score recieving yates...yeah contest are imposible to fix or manipulate, yates had a perfect physique :-\ counter argument for that: any photo of a contest yates  ;).


I'm not in disagreement with the judges YOU are , you don't like the results that's your problem facts are facts and all you offer is excuses
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2008, 10:37:38 AM
  Dude, just because you shave your body hair doesen't mean that you're now a Human and not an ape. You should be locked in a cage at the zoo judging by the level of intelligence you show in your posts. :-\ :-X

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Another great concise suckymymuscle post !!

I loved how you crushed Neo and instead of trying to defend his comments and come back with a reply he didn't even try he just posted a quote from you
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 13, 2008, 10:38:43 AM
  Dude, just because you shave your body hair doesen't mean that you're now a Human and not an ape. You should be locked in a cage at the zoo judging by the level of intelligence you show in your posts. :-\ :-X

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Yeah I'm sure that you're real educated and smart "sucmymuscle", i'll just assume that you want in on the Dorian and that other fag orgy.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 13, 2008, 10:43:34 AM
I'm not in disagreement with the judges YOU are , you don't like the results that's your problem facts are facts and all you offer is excuses
Yeah your in agreement with the judges that gave Yates 96-97, franco 81, and jay 07...you are an excelent judge of physiques.
had yates competed at the arnold, especialy in 96-97, his record would not be nearly as umblemished, yeah just my opinion...but an opinion that far more would agree with than not.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: KillerMonk on September 13, 2008, 10:45:10 AM
Simply put in this day and age with the advances in the internet judges would have to take in account the fans on message board if the 97MrO was held today Dorians biceps would cost him the title.

I am a huge Dorian fan but with 2 torn biceps he loses, to much talent to overcome these injuries
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2008, 10:45:52 AM
Yeah your in agreement with the judges that gave Yates 96-97, franco 81, and jay 07...you are an excelent judge of physiques.
had yates competed at the arnold, especialy in 96-97, his record would not be nearly as umblemished, yeah just my opinion...but an opinion that far more would agree with than not.

wow so if more agree it somehow become true great logic lol see argument ad populum  ;)

and the minority judge bodybuilding contests and not the majority so their opinions are the ones that matter most
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2008, 10:46:35 AM
Simply put in this day and age with the advances in the internet judges would have to take in account the fans on message board if the 97MrO was held today Dorians biceps would cost him the title.

I am a huge Dorian fan but with 2 torn biceps he loses, to much talent to overcome these injuries

he only had one torn bicep and a torn tricep
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 13, 2008, 10:51:42 AM
Yeah I'm sure that you're real educated and smart "sucmymuscle", i'll just assume that you want in on the Dorian and that other fag orgy.

  Dude, the irony of you calling anyone stupid and bragging about IQ. Your grammar, punctuation and ortography are atrocious, and you are unable to complete a single logical thought or even write a coherent sentence for that matter. Judging from your posts your IQ is definitely no higher than 100, and I would risk putting it around 90. I don't like to say it because it is mean and cruel especially when it's true, but alas, since you called others stupid, you deserve having this fact pointed out to you.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 13, 2008, 10:58:25 AM
wow so if more agree it somehow become true great logic lol see argument ad populum  ;)

and the minority judge bodybuilding contests and not the majority so their opinions are the ones that matter most
yes they are the only ones that matter and dorian did win those contests but the argument here is that it is widely felt by many in the industry, pros, "experts" and most improtntly the fans, that he shouldnt have.
The judges opinions were the ones that mattered, how ever bad they were...it would be great to see the training these expert judges recieve in order to properly judge dorians disfigured physique, probrably includes a lot of "hands on" stuff.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2008, 11:02:15 AM
Wayne Demilia

Did Gunther beat him there? ( Ronnie 2002 SOS ) Yeah, Gunther beat him. Beat him decisively. Then the thing I expected happened of course : what happens every time a white guy beats a black guy, " Oh it's racial. " Anytime a black guy loses , it's a racia decision.

Wayne commenting on pumpster's cries lol boo-hoo a white guy won it's fixed lol


next

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2008, 11:04:37 AM
yes they are the only ones that matter and dorian did win those contests but the argument here is that it is widely felt by many in the industry, pros, "experts" and most improtntly the fans, that he shouldnt have.
The judges opinions were the ones that mattered, how ever bad they were...it would be great to see the training these expert judges recieve in order to properly judge dorians disfigured physique, probrably includes a lot of "hands on" stuff.

Well you have your theories and or fantasies  ??? and they have their excuses but the fact remains 13 individual judges all came to the same conclusion independent of each other that speaks volumes on how much better he was compared to his contemporaries
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 13, 2008, 11:06:24 AM
Quote
I've explained to you that contests are near impossible to fix

 ::)

yeah, they are real difficult to fix.. ::)

Joe and Ben call the judges into a room, and say "have dorian win - no matter what".

and thats exactly what they did.. :-\

its really fucking simple to fix contests...

only an ignorant moron would think otherwise...

ps I love how ND is just being tossed around like a used prison bitch (to use the phrase so often metioned LOL)

but its true - his only rebuttal is :

"meltdown"

and

"your not even worth responding to"

yeah, great retorts ND.. ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2008, 11:09:55 AM
::)

yeah, they are real difficult to fix.. ::)

Joe and Ben call the judges into a room, and say "have dorian win - no matter what".

and thats exactly what they did.. :-\

its really fucking simple to fix contests...

only an ignorant moron would think otherwise...

ps I love how ND is just being tossed around like a used prison bitch (to use the phrase so often metioned LOL)

but its true - his only rebuttal is :

"meltdown"

and

"your not even worth responding to"

yeah, great retorts ND.. ::)

This coming from the ' retard ' who still can't produce proof of his claim I said all 1999 screencaps are enhanced , where is it? we're all waiting
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 13, 2008, 11:10:30 AM
Quote
but the fact remains 13 individual judges all came to the same conclusion independent of each other that speaks volumes on how much better he was compared to his contemporaries
yes, and these same judges say stuff like his missing bicep had no effect on his scores... ::)

how can you possibly condone judging THAT BAD? ???

thats what makes no sense about what you are saying ND:

you put the judges opinion up on a pedestal, yet these same judges say shit like this and it doesn't make you question their competency? ::)

unreal.

in the real world, if that were a job situation, that judge would have been dismissed so fast it would make your head spin..

incompetency is not tolerable.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2008, 11:12:10 AM
yes, and these same judges say stuff like his missing bicep had no effect on his scores... ::)

how can you possibly condone judging THAT BAD? ???

thats what makes no sense about what you are saying ND:

you put the judges opinion up on a pedestal, yet these same judges say shit like this and it doesn't make you question their competency? ::)

unreal.

in the real world, if that were a job situation, that judge would have been dismissed so fast it would make your head spin..

incompetency is not tolerable.

No the judged were ONLY competent in 2000/2001/2002/2004 lol

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 13, 2008, 11:14:35 AM
No the judged were ONLY competent in 2000/2001/2002/2004 lol



yes, they certainly scored more fairly.

the champion was scored down for showing up in less than 100% condition in the 2000's, unlike the 90's era where that never happened.. :-\
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2008, 11:15:47 AM
yes, they certainly scored more fairly.

the champion was scored down for showing up in less than 100% condition in the 2000's, unlike the 90's era where that never happened.. :-\

Dorian conditioning wasn't less than 100% thats the difference

you have excuses Yates has Sandows next
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 13, 2008, 11:17:56 AM
Dorian conditioning wasn't less than 100% thats the difference

you have excuses Yates has Sandows next
dude why are you such a dorian yates ass kisser?
he sucked big time
kevin levrone, shawn ray, paul dillet should have beat him in all those years
but the judges are blind and apparently you are too
dorian yates.....the man with the ugliest olympia physique ever oh and face  :D
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2008, 11:19:19 AM
dude why are you such a dorian yates ass kisser?
he sucked big time
kevin levrone, shawn ray, paul dillet should have beat him in all those years
but the judges are blind and apparently you are too
dorian yates.....the man with the ugliest olympia physique ever oh and face  :D

Why are you such a Dorian Yates hater? oh I know why he destroyed your man-crush lol
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 13, 2008, 11:19:28 AM
ND's worst enemies over at Muscletime are also asking the question should shawn have won the O. in 96.

and its not difficult to see why:

dorian has so little detail from the front...and shawn, well, lets just say he matched dorian's conditoining only with detail everywhere..just like a peak Ronnie Coleman did..
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 13, 2008, 11:20:00 AM
  Dude, the irony of you calling anyone stupid and bragging about IQ. Your grammar, punctuation and ortography are atrocious, and you are unable to complete a single logical thought or even write a coherent sentence for that matter. Judging from your posts your IQ is definitely no higher than 100, and I would risk putting it around 90. I don't like to say it because it is mean and cruel especially when it's true, but alas, since you called others stupid, you deserve having this fact pointed out to you.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
You're a smart one. You go on bb forums to impress and show off your high school diploma level of grammar. Sadly this is probrably the most "advanced grammar skill" requiring thing you do, as they most likely don't really ask much of you at BK do they  :-*.
You want eloquent syntax go to a literature forum, cause i really dont think anybody else gives a shit about what grade you give them on their epistolary adroit.
ps: if you really must know, i keep a getbig winndow open as i type a paper due tonight at midnight :'(, so forgive me if i don't mind my punctuation or "orthography" when posting  ;).
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2008, 11:22:54 AM
ND's worst enemies over at Muscletime are also asking the question should shawn have won the O. in 96.

and its not difficult to see why:

dorian has so little detail from the front...and shawn, well, lets just say he matched dorian's conditoining only with detail everywhere..just like a peak Ronnie Coleman did..

Muscletime can ask if Yates' deserved ALL of his titles it doesn't matter , 1996 was NO contest and to quote Wayne Demilia Yates won easily  ;)

Great pic of Yates BTW
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 13, 2008, 11:26:09 AM
Why are you such a Dorian Yates hater? oh I know why he destroyed your man-crush lol
hahahaha funny guy.......... ::)
"man crush"?
I said MANY bodybuilders beat yates not one
levrone, dillet, wheeler, ray etc
so you are the one who has a man crush on dorian yates, and considering the way he looks that's just low  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 13, 2008, 11:26:29 AM
Muscletime can ask if Yates' deserved ALL of his titles it doesn't matter , 1996 was NO contest and to quote Wayne Demilia Yates won easily  ;)

Great pic of Yates BTW

yeah, what a great pic. not a single cut or striation ANYWHERE..and this guy is supposed to be a 6 time Mr. O? ::)


oh thats right - all judges said so and it was impossible to get them to fix the contest even if your name is Joe or Ben Weider.. LOL ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 13, 2008, 11:26:59 AM
dude why are you such a dorian yates ass kisser?
he sucked big timebut the judges are blind and apparently you are too
dorian yates.....the man with the ugliest olympia physique ever oh and face  :D

At least the judges got paid off, all she has is large posters like this around the halfway house she lives in LOL
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 13, 2008, 11:27:14 AM
yeah, what a great pic. not a single cut or striation ANYWHERE..and this guy is supposed to be a 6 time Mr. O? ::)


hahahahah bro look at those things he calls legs
oh man  ;D
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 13, 2008, 11:27:45 AM
Why are you such a Dorian Yates hater? oh I know why he destroyed your man-crush lol

Schwarzenegger agrees in finding the barrel's physique more like a powerlifter.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 13, 2008, 11:28:43 AM
At least the judges got paid off, all she has is large posters like this around the dumb she rents LOL
waittttttt   :o
NarcissisticDeity  is a girl?  ??? ??? ??? ??? :o :o :o :o
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 13, 2008, 11:29:22 AM
waittttttt   :o
NarcissisticDeity  is a girl?  ??? ??? ??? ??? :o :o :o :o

Halfway home, awaiting the chop-chop operation in Mexico LOL :-* What dude would have a name like narcissist deity hahaa
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2008, 11:31:06 AM
yeah, what a great pic. not a single cut or striation ANYWHERE..and this guy is supposed to be a 6 time Mr. O? ::)


oh thats right - all judges said so and it was impossible to get them to fix the contest even if your name is Joe or Ben Weider.. LOL ::)


LMFAO striations wow he should lose the ENTIRE contest because he doesn't have more striations than everyone else great logic and blatant ignorance on what wins contests

Should shredded runner-up Shawn Ray have beaten Dorian because of his biceps tear and growing waistline? We think so, the judges didn`t!

This is Muscltime's quote growing waistline? LMFAO
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 13, 2008, 11:31:53 AM
Awaiting the chop-chop operation in Mexico LOL  :-*
oh man I bet she has fantasies of dorian yates doing her  :-X
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2008, 11:32:55 AM
waittttttt   :o
NarcissisticDeity  is a girl?  ??? ??? ??? ??? :o :o :o :o

pumpster wishes I was he has an affinity for transexuals here he brags about being able to bang a couple of them and he refers to other men as ' gorgeous ' lol

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 13, 2008, 11:33:16 AM
LMFAO striations wow he should lose the ENTIRE contest because he doesn't have more striations than everyone else great logic and blatant ignorance on what wins contests

Should shredded runner-up Shawn Ray have beaten Dorian because of his biceps tear and growing waistline? We think so, the judges didn`t!

This is Muscltime's quote growing waistline? LMFAO
wow now you're trying to convince people that dorian yates had a small waist line? :o
dude you're fucked in the head
are you a dude?  ???
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 13, 2008, 11:34:09 AM
pumpster wishes I was he has an affinity for transexuals here he brags about being able to bang a couple of them and he refers to other men as ' gorgeous ' lol


for a second there i really thought you were a girl  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 13, 2008, 11:37:33 AM
pumpster wishes I was he has an affinity for transexuals here he brags about being able to bang a couple of them and he refers to other men as ' gorgeous ' lol


this is actualy pretty funny, but its overshadowed by the fact that you are such a looser with nothing better to do that you can actually find quotes by people you chat with over the internet on a moments notice...and i know you're not the only one, that was more of a general statement about the level of gayness that goes on around here lol.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 13, 2008, 11:39:39 AM
this is actualy pretty funny, but its overshadowed by the fact that you are such a looser with nothing better to do that you can actually find quotes by people you chat with over the internet on a moments notice...and i know you're not the only one, that was more of a general statement about the level of gayness that goes on around here lol.
you have no idea what level of gayness goes on around here
we have obese people thinking they look awesome  ;D
and everyone else are dicks and huge hypocrites who judge other people but weigh like 120 pounds themselves  :D
and we have people claiming to be 280 pounds of muscle......natural  ;)
welcome to get big, a site where EVERYBODY WILL FUCK YOU  :D
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 13, 2008, 11:40:49 AM
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=233967.25

 ;D
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 13, 2008, 11:44:35 AM
you have no idea what level of gayness goes on around here
we have obese people thinking they look awesome  ;D
and everyone else are dicks and huge hypocrites who judge other people but weigh like 120 pounds themselves  :D
and we have people claiming to be 280 pounds of muscle......natural  ;)
welcome to get big, a site where EVERYBODY WILL FUCK YOU  :D
with no proof of course, and they can all bench 700 raw, fuck models, are filthy rich cage fighters. I like when they all claim bb's cant fight and claim that they( who are failed, no muscle having bb ) could kick ronnies ass, simply on the basis that they have far less muscle  ::).
EPIC TRUTH on everything there.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 13, 2008, 11:47:26 AM
EPIC TRUTH
with no proof of course, and they can all bench 700 raw, fuck models, are filthy rich cage fighters. I like when they all claim bb's cant fight and claim that they( who are failed, no muscle having bb ) could kick ronnies ass, simply on the basis that they have far less muscle  ::).
wow dude no kidding
chaos claims to be all those  ;D
and he has a bunch of his bitches who support him
look at one of my threads here on G&O me vs chaos and you be the judge  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 13, 2008, 11:55:50 AM
 :'( ;D
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 13, 2008, 12:07:24 PM
:'( ;D
you forgot the man with the best most muscular pose in history  8)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: KillerMonk on September 13, 2008, 12:14:25 PM
you forgot the man with the best most muscular pose in history  8)
Thats the best Levrone piture i have ever seen. :o
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: m8 on September 13, 2008, 12:18:20 PM
Dorian never resorted to synthol usage when his left biceps was deteriorating.
I present to you the shittiest calves in the history of bodybuilding:

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/20038-4/german-gp-1994-12.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=546fdcadea9bb366eb4efce3b2d19d27)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 13, 2008, 12:19:29 PM
You're a smart one. You go on bb forums to impress and show off your high school diploma level of grammar. Sadly this is probrably the most "advanced grammar skill" requiring thing you do, as they most likely don't really ask much of you at BK do they  :-*.
You want eloquent syntax go to a literature forum, cause i really dont think anybody else gives a shit about what grade you give them on their epistolary adroit.
ps: if you really must know, i keep a getbig winndow open as i type a paper due tonight at midnight :'(, so forgive me if i don't mind my punctuation or "orthography" when posting  ;).

  Well, your level of grammar, punctuation and ortography is way, way below the high school level.

  And this is not really the foremost reason why I think you're stupid: it is because your arguments are completely devoid of logic and don't make any sense.

  And funny that you've mentioned Burger King, because I'm guessing that's where you work at. If you must know, I am a lawyer and I make in a day more money than you make in an entire year.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 13, 2008, 12:24:21 PM
Dorian never resorted to synthol usage when his left biceps was deteriorating.
I present to you the shittiest calves in the history of bodybuilding:

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/20038-4/german-gp-1994-12.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=546fdcadea9bb366eb4efce3b2d19d27)
haha
I've seen worse than colemans
maybe he should have got calf implants and injected synthol like flex wheeler did  ??? :-\
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: m8 on September 13, 2008, 12:26:29 PM
maybe he should have got calf implants and injected synthol like flex wheeler did  ??? :-\

That's exactly what Ronnie did. Even with the synthol his calves were still out of proportion and shitty compared to the rest of him.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 13, 2008, 12:28:37 PM
That's exactly what Ronnie did. Even with the synthol his calves were still out of proportion and shitty compared to the rest of him.
genetics is a double edged sword isn't it?  ;D
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 13, 2008, 12:32:33 PM
 Well, your level of grammar, punctuation and ortography is way, way below the high school level.

  And this is not really the foremost reason why I think you're stupid: it is because your arguments are completely devoid of logic and don't make any sense.

  And funny that you've mentioned Burger King, because I'm guessing that's where you work at. If you must know, I am a lawyer and I make in a day more money than you make in an entire year.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Of course you are, and i'm an astronaut .
I back my arguments up with picture evidence all your boyfriend does is post meldown and his opinion as fact, and if you really are a lawyer you must really loose a lot of cases cause there's no way you do not suffer from some sort of retardation. Arguing dorian was better than ronnie or deserved perfect scores = retard.
btw learn to spell a word before you try and teach someone a grammar lesson, it's orthography not ortography retard.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: sculpture on September 13, 2008, 12:39:49 PM
Of course you are, and i'm an astronaut .
I back my arguments up with picture evidence all your boyfriend does is post meldown and his opinion as fact, and if you really are a lawyer you must really loose a lot of cases cause there's no way you do not suffer from some sort of retardation. Arguing dorian was better than ronnie or deserved perfect scores = retard.
btw learn to spell a word before you try and teach someone a grammar lesson, it's orthography not ortography retard.


My thoughts exactly.

How can a "lawyer" be so stupid?

They're meant to be able to make logical deductions and keen observations, two qualities this man seems to lack entirely.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 13, 2008, 12:42:04 PM
That's exactly what Ronnie did. Even with the synthol his calves were still out of proportion and shitty compared to the rest of him.

thats because he never used synthol you idiot.. ::)

why are you three the only idiots on the whole internet who have EVER suggested that ronnie inflated his calves? ::)

oh thats right - because you are stupid :-\.


Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 13, 2008, 12:42:49 PM
Of course you are, and i'm an astronaut .
I back my arguments up with picture evidence all your boyfriend does is post meldown and his opinion as fact, and if you really are a lawyer you must really loose a lot of cases cause there's no way you do not suffer from some sort of retardation. Arguing dorian was better than ronnie or deserved perfect scores = retard.
btw learn to spell a word before you try and teach someone a grammar lesson, it's orthography not ortography retard.

you will come across many that will talk shit and not back it up on this site
I'm glad to say I'm not one of them  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 13, 2008, 12:44:33 PM
thats because he never used synthol you idiot.. ::)

why are you three the only idiots on the whole internet who have EVER suggested that ronnie inflated his calves? ::)

oh thats right - because you are stupid :-\.



that's right ronnie never used synthol anywhere
I never suggested he used synthol  ??? if that was directed at me  :-\
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 13, 2008, 12:48:50 PM
My thoughts exactly.

How can a "lawyer" be so stupid?

They're meant to be able to make logical deductions and keen observations, two qualities this man seems to lack entirely.
The man works at Burger King but its very easy to say shit over the internet  ;)
I bet if he really is a mentaly challaged lawyer, this is really boosting his ego. So just to clarify, being a lawyer is not that big of a deal or very hard to acomplish after all you people are a plague in these times, it's just that it's hard to believe someone who is stupid enough to think yates was superior to coleman went to college. But who knows, maybe your mental shortcomings were the reason you chose to be one of the pack and be a lawyer when you flunked out of the engineering department  :D.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 13, 2008, 01:01:47 PM
The man works at Burger King but its very easy to say shit over the internet  ;)
I bet if he really is a mentaly challaged lawyer, this is really boosting his ego. So just to clarify, being a lawyer is not that big of a deal or very hard to acomplish after all you people are a plague in these times, it's just that it's hard to believe someone who is stupid enough to think yates was superior to coleman went to college. But who knows, maybe your mental shortcomings were the reason you chose to be one of the pack and be a lawyer when you flunked out of the engineering department  :D.

   Ready to get owned, moron? I also have a degree in chemical engineering. I went to law school exactly because there was little money to be made projecting oil refineries - all the oil money goes to the managers and shareholders and not the engineers and technicians who actually do the work. You must feel really stupid now, huh - not hard considering that it's you. As for working at Burger King, you are very obviously projecting your work on me. You obviously fit the profile of a fast food service worker perfectly. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 13, 2008, 01:03:37 PM
that's right ronnie never used synthol anywhere
I never suggested he used synthol  ??? if that was directed at me  :-\

thats wasn't directed at you.

it was directed at ND and his bitches, who claim this without proof, evidence, anything.. :-\
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 13, 2008, 01:07:10 PM
thats wasn't directed at you.

it was directed at ND and his bitches, who claim this without proof, evidence, anything.. :-\
hahahahahhahaha ND said ronnie used synthol?
where are the pictures ND? I would love to see   ::)
that's right, he just can't accept the fact that his daddy dorian yates looked like shit  :-\
it really is SAD  :'(
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 13, 2008, 01:19:35 PM
hahahahahhahaha ND said ronnie used synthol?
where are the pictures ND? I would love to see   ::)
that's right, he just can't accept the fact that his daddy dorian yates looked like shit  :-\
it really is SAD  :'(

actually, he is changing his story to say that ronnie's calves were 'injected' but not with synthol.

thats what he now claims, even though in the past he has tried to give evidence of synthol use.. ::)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 13, 2008, 01:21:13 PM
   Ready to get owned, moron? I also have a degree in chemical engineering. I went to law school exactly because there was little money to be made projecting oil refineries - all the oil money goes to the managers and shareholders and not the engineers and technicians who actually do the work. You must feel really stupid now, huh - not hard considering that it's you. As for working at Burger King, you are very obviously projecting your work on me. You obviously fit the profile of a fast food service worker perfectly. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE
I already said that you flunked out of the engineering department, no need to expain this again, and it's not the shareholders fault that no employer wanted to hire an unqualified self appointed engineer   :P.
And no dude, I told you I'm an astronaut.
If true then good for you, your older than me and I have yet to fully finish my academic endeavors(yet I'm already an astronaut  :D). Basically you're a scumbag lawyer who probrably has a shit physique and post his worthless Yates fantasies on bb forum cause you suck as a lawyer and are oviously out of work and make no money as evident by the fact that you have plenty of time for your thousands of posts on getbig.
Now it's your turn to post more of your acomplishments on the internet...BTW I invented the internet, it's true I tell you.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Earl1972 on September 13, 2008, 01:33:37 PM
   Ready to get owned, moron? I also have a degree in chemical engineering. I went to law school exactly because there was little money to be made projecting oil refineries - all the oil money goes to the managers and shareholders and not the engineers and technicians who actually do the work. You must feel really stupid now, huh - not hard considering that it's you. As for working at Burger King, you are very obviously projecting your work on me. You obviously fit the profile of a fast food service worker perfectly. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

proof?

or is this just another internet lie like you breaking a german shepherd's spine with your bare hands, benching 610 lbs, and wanting to fight me yet feeling that i should be the one that pays for your travel expenses

cue meltdown :-*

E
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 13, 2008, 01:35:37 PM
proof?

or is this just another internet lie like you breaking a german shepherd's spine with your bare hands, benching 610 lbs, and wanting to fight me yet feeling that i should be the one that pays for your travel expenses

cue meltdown :-*

E
Did this asshole actualy claim this shit...and here I was giving him the benfit of the doubt   :-\
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Earl1972 on September 13, 2008, 01:39:20 PM
Did this asshole actualy claim this shit...and here I was giving him the benfit of the doubt   :-\

yes

he also said that I give him homicidal thoughts and i'm lucky this is the internet or else he would kill me :D

he's also 6'5, extremely good looking, rich etc the guy "has it all"

funny how internet words could cause a guy like that to get so upset

kinda makes you think he's full of shit, right :)

E
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 13, 2008, 01:40:38 PM
yes

he also said that I give him homicidal thoughts and i'm lucky this is the internet or else he would kill me :D

he's also 6'5, extremely good looking, rich etc the guy "has it all"

funny how internet words could cause a guy like that to get so upset

kinda makes you think he's full of shit, right :)

E
are we talking about chaos?  :D
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 13, 2008, 01:44:33 PM
yes

he also said that I give him homicidal thoughts and i'm lucky this is the internet or else he would kill me :D

he's also 6'5, extremely good looking, rich etc the guy "has it all"

funny how internet words could cause a guy like that to get so upset

kinda makes you think he's full of shit, right :)

E
HAHAHAHAHA, oh shit !!!
a fucking rich, giant badass, super strong, internet cage fighting male model.
having thousands of posts on here but nothing to prove any of his bullshit.
"homicidal thoughts" HAHAHAHA, i think he might have meant homosexual thoughts LOL.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Earl1972 on September 13, 2008, 01:44:52 PM
are we talking about chaos?  :D

maybe they are the same guy

"suckmymuscle" also said that there is nothing wrong with having multiple accounts

maybe i'm wrong but shouldn't a successful guy be too busy or above having multiple accounts on a forum?

maybe "suckmymuscle" which btw is the gayest name on getbig, is completely full of shit ;)

E
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Earl1972 on September 13, 2008, 01:46:34 PM
HAHAHAHAHA, oh shit !!!
a fucking rich, giant badass, super strong, internet cage fighting male model.
having thousands of posts on here but nothing to prove any of his bullshit.
"homicidal thoughts" HAHAHAHA, i think he might have meant homosexual thoughts LOL.

i suggest you leave sucky alone

that is if you don't want your internet words to hurt his feelings, causing him to have thoughts of beating and killing you ;)

E
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 13, 2008, 01:51:45 PM
i suggest you leave sucky alone

that is if you don't want your internet words to hurt his feelings, causing him to have thoughts of beating and killing you ;)

E
LOL, I just shit my pants.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 13, 2008, 02:32:54 PM
oh man I bet she has fantasies of dorian yates doing her  :-X

ND awaiting "the transformation" LOL so far we have no proof whatsoever she lifts.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2008, 02:36:48 PM
ND awaiting "the transformation" LOL so far we have no proof whatsoever she lifts.

Again you're the guy who brags about having opportunities with ' gorgeous ' transexuals , what guy refers to another man in drag as ' gorgeous ' is beyond me , but ehy to each their I make no judgements on your lifestyle
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 14, 2008, 02:47:25 AM
maybe they are the same guy

"suckmymuscle" also said that there is nothing wrong with having multiple accounts

maybe i'm wrong but shouldn't a successful guy be too busy or above having multiple accounts on a forum?

maybe "suckmymuscle" which btw is the gayest name on getbig, is completely full of shit ;)

E

  I am clearly on your mind. Just look: you have just made 3 consecutive posts about me in this thread alone. You make it so transparent that I have affected you that you are not folling anyone but yourself by claiming otherwise. ;) Just like when you put your own signature back up just to prove a point to me.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Earl1972 on September 14, 2008, 09:58:51 AM
  I am clearly on your mind. Just look: you have just made 3 consecutive posts about me in this thread alone. You make it so transparent that I have affected you that you are not folling anyone but yourself by claiming otherwise. ;) Just like when you put your own signature back up just to prove a point to me.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

yes you are on my mind, owning you is so much fun 8)

still doesn't compare to you registering because of me and having thoughts of beating and killing me, now that is owning somebody's mind ;D

E
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 14, 2008, 10:18:38 AM
Again you're the guy who brags about having opportunities with ' gorgeous ' transexuals , what guy refers to another man in drag as ' gorgeous ' is beyond me , but ehy to each their I make no judgements on your lifestyle

Read the fine print dummy, i passed, leaving your kind alone bwhahahaahahaha

It's only taken ND the genius 1,300 truce pages to come up with the injection theory LOL
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 14, 2008, 10:20:43 AM
Read the fine print dummy, i passed, leaving your kind alone bwhahahaahahaha

It's only taken ND the genius 1,300 truce pages to come up with the injection theory LOL
I think he has a man crush on dorian  :D
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 14, 2008, 10:32:03 AM
Read the fine print dummy, i passed, leaving your kind alone bwhahahaahahaha

It's only taken ND the genius 1,300 truce pages to come up with the injection theory LOL

Again it doesn't matter if you passed , what man refers to other men dressed like women as ' gorgeous '? I know what kind of man lol
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 15, 2008, 03:01:42 PM
I already said that you flunked out of the engineering department, no need to expain this again, and it's not the shareholders fault that no employer wanted to hire an unqualified self appointed engineer   :P.
And no dude, I told you I'm an astronaut.
If true then good for you, your older than me and I have yet to fully finish my academic endeavors(yet I'm already an astronaut  :D). Basically you're a scumbag lawyer who probrably has a shit physique and post his worthless Yates fantasies on bb forum cause you suck as a lawyer and are oviously out of work and make no money as evident by the fact that you have plenty of time for your thousands of posts on getbig.
Now it's your turn to post more of your acomplishments on the internet...BTW I invented the internet, it's true I tell you.

  Your moronic rage amuses me. It amuses me almost as much as the fag Earl's obsession with me, although to his credit at least he maintains a facade that he is not melting down, whil you, conversely, are pretty explicit in your melt down. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Earl1972 on September 15, 2008, 04:37:19 PM
  Your moronic rage amuses me. It amuses me almost as much as the fag Earl's obsession with me, although to his credit at least he maintains a facade that he is not melting down, whil you, conversely, are pretty explicit in your melt down. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

i'm obsessed with owning you and making you cry :-*

E
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 15, 2008, 05:03:27 PM
i'm obsessed with owning you and making you cry :-*

E

  There you go replying to my post again. I bait you, and you fall for it. You are so easy. I even get you to change your profile. Just for me. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 15, 2008, 06:30:34 PM
  I suck dick for nutrition.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
Seriously you're a fag. Nobody is melting down, THIS IS A SITE FOR TALKING SHIT! The only people who melt down are queers like you who think anyone takes this crap seriously and assume that others "meltdown" just like your sensitive bitch ass  ;).
Go back and tend to the fries.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 15, 2008, 06:34:54 PM
lol Sucky could help ND at his job:
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 15, 2008, 06:37:24 PM
lol Sucky could help ND at his job:
I guess they would be rivals, cause that other fag works at BK and not MickyD's.
Yet somehow they can "come' together tand rim Dorians anus.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 15, 2008, 06:38:53 PM
lol Sucky could help ND at his job:
 

  ;)

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 15, 2008, 06:44:06 PM
I guess they would be rivals, cause that other fag works at BK and not MickyD's.
Yet somehow they can "come' together tand rim Dorians anus.

hahahaha

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 15, 2008, 06:46:33 PM
I guess they would be rivals, cause that other fag works at BK and not MickyD's.
Yet somehow they can "come' together tand rim Dorians anus.

ad hominem  learn the word  ;)
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 15, 2008, 06:52:11 PM
ad hominem  learn the word  ;)
Actualy you were the one who started writing "meltdown" and spell checking, without answering the argument presented.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 15, 2008, 06:56:17 PM
Actualy you were the one who started writing "meltdown" and spell checking, without answering the argument presented.

I actually thought about responding to your ' argument ' until you typed Shawn Ray had thicker lats and then I realized you're ignorant and a troll and I have plenty of them to correct already. And your entire rant was one long run-on sentence filled with grammatical errors and ad hominem attacks , it didn't warrant a honest reply just ridicule, and look what you've been reduced to now and you're expecting to be taken seriously?
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 15, 2008, 07:05:29 PM
I actually thought about responding to your ' argument ' until you typed Shawn Ray had thicker lats and then I realized you're ignorant and a troll and I have plenty of them to correct already. And your entire rant was one long run-on sentence filled with grammatical errors and ad hominem attacks , it didn't warrant a honest reply just ridicule, and look what you've been reduced to now and you're expecting to be taken seriously?
My attacks are not baseless, you are a homosexual if you feel the need to check other posters grammar on a bb forum FACT. I never said Rays lats were thicker. I did say in that specific pic his lat and teres major look better and since you and everyone else knows they do, you just dodged the that and decided to hear what you wanted and type LOL with a wink like a child who puts words in peoples mouth. Though I can't blame you, for it is ovious Shawn looks better in the rdb and it would be stupid of you to argue otherwise. As for calling me a "troll", you're loged on all the time, have thousands of posts, infest any Ronnie related thread with your bs, and create 100's of threads about Dorian just to get the Truce people to come to you because you have no life outside of this forum...so I think you're the "troll" here.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 15, 2008, 07:06:37 PM
My attacks are not baseless, you are a homosexual if you feel the need to check other posters grammar on a bb forum FACT. I never said Rays lats were thicker. I did say in that specific pic his lat and teres major look better and since you and everyone else knows they do, you just dodged the that and decided to hear what you wanted and type LOL with a wink like a child who puts words in peoples mouth. Though I can't blame you, for it is ovious Shawn looks better in the rdb and it would be stupid of you to argue otherwise. As for calling me a "troll", you're loged on all the time, have thousands of posts, infest any Ronnie related thread with your bs, and create 100's of threads about Dorian just to get the Truce people to come to you because you have no life outside of this forum...so I think you're the "troll" here.

textbook meltdown

thanks for playing we have some lovely parting gifts for you .
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 15, 2008, 07:17:55 PM
textbook meltdown

thanks for playing we have some lovely parting gifts for you .
Man you're good at ducking and weaving, i bet you are a good boxer.....for a homo anyway  :D
Like I told the other homosexual, only bitches who take this shit seriously and routinely "meltdown" themselves assume others do the same. Step away from the computer and chill bitch, maybe even go out and try socializing with real people.
Cute line btw, you really are a lonely looser in every sense of the word.
??? Why are you mostly loged on during working hours, piece of shit collecting welfare checks perhaps?
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 15, 2008, 07:44:57 PM
Man you're good at ducking and weaving, i bet you are a good boxer.....for a homo anyway  :D
Like I told the other homosexual, only bitches who take this shit seriously and routinely "meltdown" themselves assume others do the same. Step away from the computer and chill bitch, maybe even go out and try socializing with real people.
Cute line btw, you really are a lonely looser in every sense of the word.
??? Why are you mostly loged on during working hours, piece of shit collecting welfare checks perhaps?

hahahahahaha

I too have often wonder this. I can get home from work, post and instantly ND posts..

its like he sits on this forum all day, waiting for me to post,  collecting his welfare checks hahahahaha

Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Earl1972 on September 15, 2008, 07:45:07 PM
  There you go replying to my post again. I bait you, and you fall for it. You are so easy. I even get you to change your profile. Just for me. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

haha right YOU MENTION MY NAME and you are in my head not vice versa ;)

thanks again for reminding me what a classic quote i came up with 8)

E
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 16, 2008, 12:51:44 AM
I guess they would be rivals, cause that other fag works at BK and not MickyD's.
Yet somehow they can "come' together tand rim Dorians anus.

  I think it's funny that you, who fits perfectly the profile of a fast food service worker, from being dumb to having clearly a low education level - evident by your orthography, punctuation and grammar -, would say this. I mean, you do know that people who work in the low jobs at the service industry tend to have your characteristics of low IQ and little scholarship, right? ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: Hulkster on September 16, 2008, 03:39:07 AM
Quote
I mean, you do know that people who work in the low jobs at the service industry tend to have your characteristics of low IQ and little scholarship, right?

of course - just look at ND.

my 4 year old neice has better reading comprehension skills than he does... :-\
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: pumpster on September 16, 2008, 05:54:36 AM
you are a homosexual if you feel the need to check other posters grammar on a bb forum FACT. I never said Rays lats were thicker. you just dodged the that and decided to hear what you wanted and type LOL with a wink like a child who puts words in peoples mouth.

As for calling me a "troll", you're loged on all the time, have thousands of posts, infest any Ronnie related thread with your bs, and create 100's of threads about Dorian just to get the Truce people to come to you because you have no life outside of this forum...so I think you're the "troll"
here.


BINGO
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 16, 2008, 06:11:46 AM
  I think it's funny that you, who fits perfectly the profile of a fast food service worker, from being dumb to having clearly a low education level - evident by your orthography, punctuation and grammar -, would say this. I mean, you do know that people who work in the low jobs at the service industry tend to have your characteristics of low IQ and little scholarship, right? ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE
I'm glad you spelled "orthography" correctly this time, good to see that you embrace my constructive criticim and try to improve yourself  ;)
They might just promote you from fry boy to the drive through  :D
Low IQ??? Are'nt you the one who claims a lot of shit over the internet with no proof whatsoever? Why do you do this, because your reality is pathetic.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 16, 2008, 08:58:17 AM
I'm glad you spelled "orthography" correctly this time, good to see that you embrace my constructive criticim and try to improve yourself  ;)
They might just promote you from fry boy to the drive through  :D
Low IQ??? Are'nt you the one who claims a lot of shit over the internet with no proof whatsoever? Why do you do this, because your reality is pathetic.

  Ha ha ha...you ignorant gym rat. Seriously, tell us all what to do for a living. You have all the traits of a massive failure at life. You probably clean toilets for a living in a gay bar because your shitty physique doesen't allow you to have the more "glamorous" position of go-go boy, while you persue a "career" as a personal trainer. Hey, if you some day manage to win a local amateur show maybe you will make minimum wage instead of having to clean shit and spooge from the gay bar's bathroom floor and give the guys there blow jobs for spare change. ;D 8)

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 16, 2008, 05:49:36 PM
  Ha ha ha...you ignorant gym rat. Seriously, tell us all what to do for a living. You have all the traits of a massive failure at life. You probably clean toilets for a living in a gay bar because your shitty physique doesen't allow you to have the more "glamorous" position of go-go boy, while you persue a "career" as a personal trainer. Hey, if you some day manage to win a local amateur show maybe you will make minimum wage instead of having to clean shit and spooge from the gay bar's bathroom floor and give the guys there blow jobs for spare change. ;D 8)

SUCKMYMUSCLE
"gym rat" LOL @ your dumbass
It's cool you think I'm a bodybuilder, but I assure I am not, just a guy who exercises to stay healthy. Why would I tell you my job over the internet without any proof like you Mr. engineer/lawyer? I'm still working on my MBA so I'll update you when all is said and finished  ;).
As for my "shitty physique", I'm sure the one who were too embarassed to post a picture of is better  ::). My physique is so bad infact that you just assumed I'm a competative bodybuilder hunh  :-*.
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 16, 2008, 05:57:27 PM
"gym rat" LOL @ your dumbass
It's cool you think I'm a bodybuilder, but I assure I am not, just a guy who exercises to stay healthy. Why would I tell you my job over the internet without any proof like you Mr. engineer/lawyer? I'm still working on my MBA so I'll update you when all is said and finished  ;).
As for my "shitty physique", I'm sure the one who were too embarassed to post a picture of is better  ::). My physique is so bad infact that you just assumed I'm a competative bodybuilder hunh  :-*.

  Who said I called you a competitive bodybuilder, moron? I called you gym rat. You have all the traits of a gym rat, from being dumb to overly aggressive. Your moronic rage is rather amusing though. I truly hope you can get some customers for your personal training business so that you can some day quit your job as a janitor and stop cleaning toilets with your tongue. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: For ND
Post by: RC Money on September 16, 2008, 06:19:20 PM
  Ha ha ha...you ignorant gym rat. Seriously, tell us all what to do for a living. You have all the traits of a massive failure at life. You probably clean toilets for a living in a gay bar because your shitty physique doesen't allow you to have the more "glamorous" position of go-go boy, while you persue a "career" as a personal trainer. Hey, if you some day manage to win a local amateur show maybe you will make minimum wage instead of having to clean shit and spooge from the gay bar's bathroom floor and give the guys there blow jobs for spare change. ;D 8)

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Someone who wins a local amateur bb show would be considered a competative bb you stupid piece of shit.

You work at Burger King asshole, you also claim a 600lbs bench on the internet  ::) As well as admiting to meltingdown with your "homicidal thoughts".
Face it in real life your work the fries at BK and would run like a bitch or shit yourself if someone ever confronted you, that's why you say I'm aggressive cause you're a pussy.

Your physique undoubtedly sucks and you figured I was either a PT or BB by my pic, not by my "aggressive" posts ;). I don't dislike you man, it's just the internet, and if you need tips on how to shed some lbs I'll help. I assume working so close to the fries can be tempting. Is it safe to also assume you are skinny/fat, try spending less time on getbig and actualy lift some weights. You have to understand that resistance training builds muscle 1000% better than keyboarding. Hope this helps  :P