- Harris just repeated memorized lines. I was not impressed.
- Trump's line: "I'm talking now. Does that sound familiar" was a drop the mic laugh out loud moment.
- The moderators were ridiculously biased. Repeatedly tried to fact check Trump and help Harris. Did not fact check Harris once. Including Harris lying about "very fine people," police officers dying on January 6, "blood bath," etc.
- Trump saying Harris should wake Biden up and get him out of bed at 4 p.m. so he can close the border was pretty funny.
- Trump responding to the threat to democracy claim from Harris by saying Biden got 14 millions votes and she got none . . . talk about to threat democracy . . . was pretty good.
- Trump saying "quiet please" when Harris tried to talk over him again made me laugh out loud.
- The moderators didn't fact check Harris and Trump failed to clearly respond to Harris lying about supporting private health insurance and opposing gun confiscation.
Stuck in a hotel. Wanted to go see a movie to avoid what I predicted would be a train wreck. Didn't like anything playing. Stuck watching the train wreck instead.I didn't watch the debate just saw a clip of his closing statement and he seemed to put her on the spot about how she's had 3.5 years to "fix" things, why hasn't she done it.
My thoughts:
- The first question was the best question of the night: are you better off today than four years ago. Didn't get answered.
- Trump telling Harris that her policy positions on her website were simplistic and they are like "run spot run" made me laugh.
- Trump telling Harris he would send Harris a MAGA hat was mildly funny.
- Trump let Harris bait him on a number of irrelevant, dumb issues. He did a poor job of staying on message.
- Harris just repeated memorized lines. I was not impressed.
- Her abortion comments were just plain dumb. After saying we need Roe v. Wade back, she said that in every state where abortion has come up for a vote in red and blue states the people have voted for freedom. In other words, we don't need Roe v. Wade and Trump was right. But she is not smart enough to understand it.
- Trump's line: "I'm talking now. Does that sound familiar" was a drop the mic laugh out loud moment.
- The moderators were ridiculously biased. Repeatedly tried to fact check Trump and help Harris. Did not fact check Harris once. Including Harris lying about "very fine people," police officers dying on January 6, "blood bath," etc.
- Trump saying Harris should wake Biden up and get him out of bed at 4 p.m. so he can close the border was pretty funny.
- A bunch of stupid friggin questions from the moderators. Peaceful transfer of power, did you lose the election, what color is Kamala Harris, etc. Who the heck cares about that crap?
- Trump responding to the threat to democracy claim from Harris by saying Biden got 14 millions votes and she got none . . . talk about to threat democracy . . . was pretty good.
- Trump saying "quiet please" when Harris tried to talk over him again made me laugh out loud.
- Trump talking about how weak Harris is as demonstrated by her meeting with Zelensky and Putin invading three days later was good.
- They brought up Afghanistan, asked Harris if she bears any responsibility for how it played out, let her skate on her answer, then dropped the topic like a bad habit. Ridiculous.
- The moderators didn't fact check Harris and Trump failed to clearly respond to Harris lying about supporting private health insurance and opposing gun confiscation.
- Talking about climate change was a waste of my time.
- Overall, Harris and her histrionics when she was not speaking looked unprofessional and non-presidential. She sounded like someone who memorized and the repeated her lines. Trump is unscripted and speaks more like a non-politician, but he really whiffed overall on forcing her to respond to the issues that matter. He did hit her on her fracking lies, but not well enough. I didn't like what I saw.
I want that two hours of my life back. I should have gone to go see a lousy movie.
I didn't watch the debate just saw a clip of his closing statement and he seemed to put her on the spot about how she's had 3.5 years to "fix" things, why hasn't she done it.\
Are they going to have another debate? One where the moderators aren't completely biased?
I wouldn't say he outright won either. I'd say he shit the bed. How many times can you fit the fear mongering 100 million illegal immigrants who are from prisons, mental institutions and casting votes and eating pets into a presidential debate? about 6 or 8 times apparently
If there are ANY undecided voters after this debate I'd like to interview them.
- Trump's line: "I'm talking now. Does that sound familiar" was a drop the mic laugh out loud moment.
- Trump saying "quiet please" when Harris tried to talk over him again made me laugh out loud.
- Trump saying Harris should wake Biden up and get him out of bed at 4 p.m. so he can close the border was pretty funny.
- The moderators were ridiculously biased. Repeatedly tried to fact check Trump and help Harris. Did not fact check Harris once. Including Harris lying about "very fine people," police officers dying on January 6, "blood bath," etc.
I thought Trump made a good point about his tariffs. If they didn't like the tariffs, then they should have gotten rid of them. Harris didn't address that.
\I know you're TDS retarded but try to focus. She's been there for the last 3.5 years, she's had plenty of time to do the things she claims she's going to, why hasn't she?
So you admit you didn't bother to watch the debate, ignore he had 4 years as president to fix things, and then focus on her as vp having 3.5 to fix things and you pretend you aren't biased. Please.
\
So you admit you didn't bother to watch the debate, ignore he had 4 years as president to fix things, and then focus on her as vp having 3.5 to fix things and you pretend you aren't biased. Please.
Still no "proof" that the 2020 election was rigged. (Despite claiming to have proof that exonerates everyone) ::)
All the whining he did about the debate, the rules, the number of debates, Harris changing her mind, etc..etc..Can you link all of those posts or are you still a typical lying liberal?
And he didn't even bother to watch it. ::)
Can you link all of those posts or are you still a typical lying liberal?
Like I asked that weirdo Lurker, where did Trump accept this invitation to debate the cackling Kuntmala?
Where, in that little snippet of lies you quoted, does it show that Trump agreed to debate her then backed out?
Nobody knows her position on anything other than the position that got her start in politics. She is hiding from any sort of interview or debate. ::)
Like I told the other dipshit, one is selling products, the other has her token rich white guy begging for money on youtube.
Who was running against him when he agreed to the debates ???
I think she edged him in this debate.
We can poke at all sorts of things on both sides. But IMO, She came across better. Trump seemed to mostly attack and fear monger while she seemed, although much cliched, more focused on issues (she fear mongered too). I missed the start.
The assertions that she couldn't handle herself in a debate seemed untrue. She did alright. Much better than Biden, but who couldn't do better?
I think she is going to win this election. SMH. How did we get here?
Trump sucked and missed easy opportunities to absolutely destroy her. I honestly feel I could have been called into sub for him, unprepared and destroyed both her and the moderators.
When she blatantly lied (Very fine / J6 / 2025) a simple comment to the moderators like "are you going to fact check her like you have been me? Because I know you know that's a lie. I'll give you a chance to correct". It would have made them all look foolish.
But, at the end of the day, I think people vote with their wallet, and Harris is fucked here, no matter how they window dress it.
Laptop story suppression happened and affected the election.
Yeah, the bias was pretty apparent. Still, though, who are swing voters going to vote for? Many will vote with their wallets. But, many will ask themselves do I want to vote for more of Trump (with all his baggage, legit or not) or do I want to vote for something new? I think they will see Kamala Harrie as something newer and more hopeful than Trump.
I don't think she will be a good president.
Porn star adultery story suppression so it balanced it out.
I don't think independents feel that way. They see all the failures of the current admin and associate Harris with that. I don't think her performance will change anyone's mind who was voting Trump. If they vote Harris, it wasn't because of this.We will soon see. It's going to be crazy.
Not even close. Trump fidelity, or lack thereof, is widely known.
This laptop thing is so bizarre it almost doesn't seem real.
If the population knew the candidate's crackhead son actually did leave a laptop that provided evidence that contradicted so much of what said candidate was saying, it would have sunk him.
Stuck in a hotel. Wanted to go see a movie to avoid what I predicted would be a train wreck. Didn't like anything playing. Stuck watching the train wreck instead.
My thoughts:
- The first question was the best question of the night: are you better off today than four years ago. Didn't get answered.
- Trump telling Harris that her policy positions on her website were simplistic and they are like "run spot run" made me laugh.
- Trump telling Harris he would send Harris a MAGA hat was mildly funny.
- Trump let Harris bait him on a number of irrelevant, dumb issues. He did a poor job of staying on message.
- Harris just repeated memorized lines. I was not impressed.
- Her abortion comments were just plain dumb. After saying we need Roe v. Wade back, she said that in every state where abortion has come up for a vote in red and blue states the people have voted for freedom. In other words, we don't need Roe v. Wade and Trump was right. But she is not smart enough to understand it.
- Trump's line: "I'm talking now. Does that sound familiar" was a drop the mic laugh out loud moment.
- The moderators were ridiculously biased. Repeatedly tried to fact check Trump and help Harris. Did not fact check Harris once. Including Harris lying about "very fine people," police officers dying on January 6, "blood bath," etc.
- Trump saying Harris should wake Biden up and get him out of bed at 4 p.m. so he can close the border was pretty funny.
- A bunch of stupid friggin questions from the moderators. Peaceful transfer of power, did you lose the election, what color is Kamala Harris, etc. Who the heck cares about that crap?
- Trump responding to the threat to democracy claim from Harris by saying Biden got 14 millions votes and she got none . . . talk about to threat democracy . . . was pretty good.
- Trump saying "quiet please" when Harris tried to talk over him again made me laugh out loud.
- Trump talking about how weak Harris is as demonstrated by her meeting with Zelensky and Putin invading three days later was good.
- They brought up Afghanistan, asked Harris if she bears any responsibility for how it played out, let her skate on her answer, then dropped the topic like a bad habit. Ridiculous.
- The moderators didn't fact check Harris and Trump failed to clearly respond to Harris lying about supporting private health insurance and opposing gun confiscation.
- Talking about climate change was a waste of my time.
- Overall, Harris and her histrionics when she was not speaking looked unprofessional and non-presidential. She sounded like someone who memorized and the repeated her lines. Trump is unscripted and speaks more like a non-politician, but he really whiffed overall on forcing her to respond to the issues that matter. He did hit her on her fracking lies, but not well enough. I didn't like what I saw.
I want that two hours of my life back. I should have gone to go see a lousy movie.
It might be widely known, but Christians would take offense to it. Unless of course, they were hypocritical and fake Christians, much like Trumpy himself.
But Hunter wasn't running for POTUS. And the candidate for GOP which likes to portray themselves as the party of Family Values and Faith, was anything but.
Hunter wasn't running, but the laptop proved the guy running was a liar, and possibly corrupt.
You think anyone who knew about Stormy Daniels would have changed their mind? Lol.
And they probably eat pets too.
Which one of those do you see as a defense of Trump? Maybe it's your perception of anything other than an attack on Trump is seen as a defense?
Good thing you didn't watch the debate. Your TDfS would have left you in a coma.
She wiped the floor with him. He just whined and lied over and over again about the same things that have been exposed as false.
People eating dogs and cats? ::)
Jails and mental institutions being emptied and sent here? ::)
Murdering babies after they are born? ::)
Still no "proof" that the 2020 election was rigged. (Despite claiming to have proof that exonerates everyone) ::)
And the funniest part was when she baited him to go down that rabbit hole about his rallies. :D :D :D :D
She should debate him again now. Or maybe he will just settle for his usual middle of the night rage tweets instead.
The most important numbers of the night are right here….
Greg Kelly from Newsmax just brought up an interesting point. President Trump directly answered 9 of 12 questions asked of him during the debate or 75%. Harris directly answered 2 of 11 questions or 18%. Who won that debate?
I also thought Trump mimicking VP Harris' line was hysterical.
I thought Trump told his base exactly what they like to hear... which was nothing they had not heard before from him.
There probably won't be another debate between these two, but if there is and you are in the same situation, go to a movie instead of watching the debate. LOL!
Greg Kelly from Newsmax just brought up an interesting point. President Trump directly answered 9 of 12 questions asked of him during the debate or 75%. Harris directly answered 2 of 11 questions or 18%. Who won that debate?That's true but how do the viewers and especially independents feel about who won the debate? Trump needs to prepare better for the next debate to be more focused and not go off on so many tangents.
She wiped the floor with him. He just whined and lied over and over again about the same things that have been exposed as false.TRUMP WON THE DEBATE BY A LANDSLIDE!!! IT WAS NOT EVEN CLOSE. THREE PEOPLE DEBATED HIM BUT ONLY GARBAGE CAME OUT OF THEIR PIE HOLES.
People eating dogs and cats? ::)
Jails and mental institutions being emptied and sent here? ::)
Murdering babies after they are born? ::)
Still no "proof" that the 2020 election was rigged. (Despite claiming to have proof that exonerates everyone) ::)
And the funniest part was when she baited him to go down that rabbit hole about his rallies. :D :D :D :D
She should debate him again now. Or maybe he will just settle for his usual middle of the night rage tweets instead.
Trumpy thinks he won. :D :D :D :D Cognitive tests anyone? Even his own allies don't think so.TRUMP WON THE DEBATE AFTER FACING OFF AGAINST 3. DONE, DONE, AND DONE. NEXT!
---
RFK - "Harris clearly won"
RFK Jr. Tells Fox News That Harris ‘Clearly Won the Debate'
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=RFK+Jr.+Tells+Fox+News+That+Harris+%E2%80%98Clearly+Won+the+Debate%2C
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. thinks Vice President Kamala Harris “clearly” won Tuesday night’s debate over former President Donald Trump, despite endorsing the Republican nominee just a few weeks ago.
The former presidential candidate told Fox News anchors Wednesday that the vice president came off more polished than the former president.
“Vice President Harris clearly won the debate in terms of her delivery, her polish, her organization and her preparation. I think on substance, President Trump wins in terms of his governance, but he didn’t tell that story,” RFK Jr. said.
---
While Donald Trump touts his debate performance, allies, donors and advisers lament it
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=While+Donald+Trump+touts+his+debate+performance%2C+allies%2C+donors+and+advisers+lament+it+
---
The most important numbers of the night are right here….
(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=693808.0;attach=1527528;image)
Is there a link to that poll?
All easily provable….
TRUMP WON THE DEBATE BY A LANDSLIDE!!! IT WAS NOT EVEN CLOSE. THREE PEOPLE DEBATED HIM BUT ONLY GARBAGE CAME OUT OF THEIR PIE HOLES.AT LEAST YOU ARE FOR DICKS
Is there a link to that poll?
I don't think Trump did well, but it does feel the debate didn't really hurt him surprisingly.
ABC is coming out of it looking awful, and people have seen the bias now.
But I'm also amazing how many softballs Harris threw out, that could have EASILY made her look stupid. Trump whiffed so bad on these.
Did anyone here who considers themselves middle of the road change their mind due to the debate? I didn't.
That's true but how do the viewers and especially independents feel about who won the debate? Trump needs to prepare better for the next debate to be more focused and not go off on so many tangents.
---
Drudge Report Sums Up Donald Trump's Debate Performance With 2 Final Words
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Drudge+Report+Sums+Up+Donald+Trump%27s+Debate+Performance+With+2+Final+Words
“The End.”
Those are the two words the conservative Drudge Report website posted as its main headline on Tuesday night following Donald Trump’s widely panned performance in the presidential debate against Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee.
It linked to Mediaite’s coverage of Trump being fact-checked during the debate for pushing a debunked story that migrants in Ohio are eating people’s pets.
The Matt Drudge-founded website, which has soured on Trump since backing him in the 2016 election, also linked to NBC News’ story on the theme and captioned it, “The Night Trump Lost It All.”
Another headline on the website called it Trump’s “worst performance of his career” and pointed to this story on Deadline.
---
---
Don't know about the one Coach posted specifically, but here's this one from CNN:
"But voters who tuned in gave Trump a 20-point advantage over Harris after the debate on handling the economy, 55% to 35% – a margin that’s slightly wider than his pre-debate edge.
Debate watchers also gave Trump a 23-point advantage over Harris when it came to whom they trusted to handle immigration and a 6-point edge on handling the role of commander in chief."
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/11/politics/election-poll-trump-harris-debate/index.html
The most important numbers of the night are right here….
Uninformed Harris voters like Lurker, Prime, Agnostic, etc don’t care about things like this even though it does affect them as well. Dems have ran this country for 12 of the last 16 years. Their vision is to turn the country into a third world shithole like the major Dem ran cities they’re in charge of.
Trump internal confidential memo
I don't think Trump did well, but it does feel the debate didn't really hurt him surprisingly.I don't think either one did particularly well. From the little bit I've seen here and there, neither provided any impactful answers, although I think Trumps answers were closer to the topic of the question being asked. It looks like this debate was a huge waste of time, unimpressed.
ABC is coming out of it looking awful, and people have seen the bias now.
But I'm also amazing how many softballs Harris threw out, that could have EASILY made her look stupid. Trump whiffed so bad on these.
Don't know about the one Coach posted specifically, but here's this one from CNN:
"But voters who tuned in gave Trump a 20-point advantage over Harris after the debate on handling the economy, 55% to 35% – a margin that’s slightly wider than his pre-debate edge.
Debate watchers also gave Trump a 23-point advantage over Harris when it came to whom they trusted to handle immigration and a 6-point edge on handling the role of commander in chief."
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/11/politics/election-poll-trump-harris-debate/index.html
Have you ever considered posting something in your own words, or are you only able to repeat tired statements made by others (specifically Trump), such as saying this country was turned into a 'third world shithole?' BTW, in what was specifically is the U.S. a third world shithole?
Uninformed Harris voters like Lurker, Prime, Agnostic, etc don’t care about things like this even though it does affect them as well. Dems have ran this country for 12 of the last 16 years. Their vision is to turn the country into a third world shithole like the major Dem ran cities they’re in charge of.
I always feel like I'm arguing with a 6th grader when I respond to your posts so I don't do it that often but since I am named...
There is no truth to your post on the whole, it's a far rightwing nut position that has no basis in facts... So no point responding to that. Let's talk about the debate. How do you think Trump did overall? Anything he say make you cringe? Pet eating? Emptying out Insane asylum and prisons?
1st question to Harris, Do you think this country is better off now than 4 years ago. I cringed. She could have and should have answered it with substance. I feel she instead went off on a rehearsed response she had planned to incorporate somewhere in the debate and out of I don't know, nerves, she just spat it out. Didn't answer the question. Any of those moments for you coach from the other side when Trump was talking and you kind of sunk down in your couch?
The irony.
I feel the same with your posts.. so...
I ask YOU... any cringe moments Trump provided? Or are you going to be as silent as Coach...
Most independents are swinging to Trump because they’re more concerned about everyday issues like the economy and how inflation is affecting higher grocery’s and the border.I hope so.
I feel the same with your posts.. so...
I ask YOU... any cringe moments Trump provided? Or are you going to be as silent as Coach...
Those are my words Jack, no one else’s.
Those are my words Jack, no one else’s.
I feel the same with your posts.. so...
I ask YOU... any cringe moments Trump provided? Or are you going to be as silent as Coach...
I’ll jump in. I watched about 15 minutes. I cringed most of the time. Some because he was spouting off nonsense about Haitians eating cats (although I do believe some of the stories shown of them killing geese and eating them) but mostly because he couldn’t get his point across because he was melting down. I haven’t seen him lack composure like that since the first Biden 2020 debate where Biden told him to shut up because he was rambling. He has some valid points, but once he gets on his heels, he’s flustered and sounds dumb. She had him on the ropes, and a more skilled orator couldn’t totally put him down but she didn’t. I supposed she figured she’d let him hang himself, rather than possibly hang herself too.
I also didn’t like the lack of fact checking, but he should’ve called her out for the “bloodbath” “very fine people” remarks as well as saying cops died at the January 6th riot. The only person that died was some fat Trump supporters of heart attacks and that lady who got shot for charging that cop.
I appreciate your response. You have the character to not pretend Trump knocked it out of the ball park like few others have. Thank you
NYT admits Harris supports funding migrant sex changes in fact-check ruling Trump's claim 'needs context'
https://www.foxnews.com/media/nyt-admits-harris-supports-funding-migrant-sex-changes-fact-check-ruling-trumps-claim-needs-context
Pretty much everyone in this thread has said Trump didn't knock it out of the park. Most agreed he lost on performance.
And substance. And policy discussion. And all around acting like anything other than a deranged uncle you keep locked in the bedroom when company is over.
After the Biden debacle, the left lost any moral high ground when it comes to criticizing someone's mental state.
The fact that he's still in "charge" is insane.
After this debate, the right lost any moral high ground and excuse for not demanding a cognitive test of their candidate.
He didn't act any different than he normally does.
He didn't act any different than he normally does.
Exactly. Just more of the same old nonsense that his followers take and as gospel.
Each side's base does the same for their candidates. Harris' side ignore all her faults, gaffes, flip flops, lies, and everything else Trump's does for him. It's really no different.
So many conservatives were critical of Trump's performance. Tons viewed it objectively.
It was a missed opportunity from him for sure, but it didn't seem to move the needle much. Harris went on a softball interview the next day an answered "What specifically would you do to help the economy" and her answer was basically "I grew up middle class where people took good care of their lawns". It literally was not much more than that.
Weren't we talking about the debate? Friday's interview gave her the opportunity to go into a lot more detail about herself, her feelings and her plans for action when she is elected President. Did you have the opportunity to watch this interview? If not, check it out. Pretty cool, she is wearing Chuck Taylor All Stars. -Guess she wasn't concerned about her height.
Harris went on a softball interview the next day an answered "What specifically would you do to help the economy" and her answer was basically "I grew up middle class where people took good care of their lawns". It literally was not much more than that.
Do you even read what I post?
You know what his answer will consist of. Not the exact wording, but I have my ideas of what the message will be. There will be no real answer.
I literally referred to it in the post you responded to.
Yes, you did. In fact, you referred to both the debate and the interview. Your post also mentions Harris' comments about growing up middle-class and people being proud of their lawns. Furthermore, you wrote that her side ignores all her faults, gaffes, flip flops, and lies. One might conclude that you think VP Harris’ comments on how she was raised was somehow a fault, flip-flop, gaffe, or a lie. I do not see anything wrong with what she said during the interview or when she mentioned growing up middle-class in the debate. I posted the video of the interview so folks on Getbig could hear her remarks in context.
Yes, there's nothing wrong with saying you grew up middle class with nice lawns.....except if you're running for President and the question was "WHAT WOULD YOU DO SPECIFICALLY TO HELP THE ECONOMY".
Geez man.
Yes, you did. In fact, you referred to both the debate and the interview. Your post also mentions Harris' comments about growing up middle-class and people being proud of their lawns. Furthermore, you wrote that her side ignores all her faults, gaffes, flip flops, and lies. One might conclude that you think VP Harris’ comments on how she was raised were somehow a fault, flip-flop, gaffe, or a lie. I do not see anything wrong with what she said during the interview or when she mentioned growing up middle-class in the debate. I posted the video of the interview so folks on Getbig could hear her remarks in context.
Speaking of comments, have you read or heard what Trump posted today on Truth Social? He wrote, "I hate Taylor Swift." This may be one of the most truthful things he has ever said. I give him credit for his honesty. However, I do not see it as a wise campaign move. IMO, he would have better served himself if avoided saying anything about Taylor Swift either positive or negative.
Many people have commented about not knowing who she is as a person. Unlike Trump, VP Harris is, or was not a celebrity whose entire life is publicized.
During that interview, she answered the questions he asked.
Geeze man.
You're in another world.
She was asked "what specifically would you do to help the economy" and she absolutely did not answer it.
The Taylor Swift comment was more Trump dumb-assery
What world would that be? I believe we were discussing what VP Harris said not what she did not say.She's a liar, sad that you and others cannot see it.
In the event you missed it and are interested in what VP Harris is saying she and her administration would do to help the economy, here is a video of her talking about this.
"Aug 16, 2024 #kamalaharris #news #economy
Vice President Kamala Harris rolled out her plan to address specific economic policies Friday while campaigning in Raleigh, North Carolina. Her proposals include subsidizing low-wage workers and families with children. Harris also proposed some benefits for first-time homebuyers."i=CfWVEb7y19xvSzkg
She's a liar, sad that you and others cannot see it.
Trump is a liar, sad that you and others choose to ignore it.If you say so.
FYI, I have said and posted many times that politicians tell folks what they want to hear. Sometimes people don't want to hear the truth because the truth can be hard for them to hear.
What world would that be? I believe we were discussing what VP Harris said not what she did not say.
VP Harris did answer the question in the interview with Brian Taff. I believe this was at about 3:12 into it.
In the event you missed it and are interested in what VP Harris is saying she and her administration would do to help the economy, here is a previous video of her talking about this.
"Aug 16, 2024 #kamalaharris #news #economy
Vice President Kamala Harris rolled out her plan to address specific economic policies Friday while campaigning in Raleigh, North Carolina. Her proposals include subsidizing low-wage workers and families with children. Harris also proposed some benefits for first-time homebuyers."i=CfWVEb7y19xvSzkg
Yes, there's nothing wrong with saying you grew up middle class with nice lawns.....except if you're running for President and the question was "WHAT WOULD YOU DO SPECIFICALLY TO HELP THE ECONOMY".
Geez man.
You're in another world.LMAO!! Keep fighting the good fight. :D
She was asked "what specifically would you do to help the economy" and she absolutely did not answer it.
The Taylor Swift comment was more Trump dumb-assery
Child Tax credits and 25k for housing will not curb inflation, interest rates, or stimulate the economy.
You're in another world.
She was asked "what specifically would you do to help the economy" and she absolutely did not answer it.
The Taylor Swift comment was more Trump dumb-assery
Trump is a liar, sad that you and others choose to ignore it.
FYI, I have said and posted many times that politicians tell folks what they want to hear. Sometimes people don't want to hear the truth because the truth can be hard for them to hear.
When was she asked that in the debate? This is all I could find about a plan.
DAVID MUIR: So let's get started. I want to begin tonight with the issue voters repeatedly say is their number one issue, and that is the economy and the cost of living in this country. Vice President Harris, you and President Trump were elected four years ago and your opponent on the stage here tonight often asks his supporters, are you better off than you were four years ago? When it comes to the economy, do you believe Americans are better off than they were four years ago?
VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS: So, I was raised as a middle-class kid. And I am actually the only person on this stage who has a plan that is about lifting up the middle class and working people of America. I believe in the ambition, the aspirations, the dreams of the American people. And that is why I imagine and have actually a plan to build what I call an opportunity economy. Because here's the thing. We know that we have a shortage of homes and housing, and the cost of housing is too expensive for far too many people. We know that young families need support to raise their children. And I intend on extending a tax cut for those families of $6,000, which is the largest child tax credit that we have given in a long time. So that those young families can afford to buy a crib, buy a car seat, buy clothes for their children. My passion, one of them, is small businesses. I was actually -- my mother raised my sister and me but there was a woman who helped raise us. We call her our second mother. She was a small business owner. I love our small businesses. My plan is to give a $50,000 tax deduction to start-up small businesses, knowing they are part of the backbone of America's economy. My opponent, on the other hand, his plan is to do what he has done before, which is to provide a tax cut for billionaires and big corporations, which will result in $5 trillion to America's deficit. My opponent has a plan that I call the Trump sales tax, which would be a 20% tax on everyday goods that you rely on to get through the month. Economists have said that Trump's sales tax would actually result for middle-class families in about $4,000 more a year because of his policies and his ideas about what should be the backs of middle-class people paying for tax cuts for billionaires.
DAVID MUIR: We are going to get to immigration and border security during this debate. But I would like to let Vice President Harris respond on the economy here.
VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS: Well, I would love to. Let's talk about what Donald Trump left us. Donald Trump left us the worst unemployment since the Great Depression. Donald Trump left us the worst public health epidemic in a century. Donald Trump left us the worst attack on our democracy since the Civil War. And what we have done is clean up Donald Trump's mess. What we have done and what I intend to do is build on what we know are the aspirations and the hopes of the American people. But I'm going to tell you all, in this debate tonight, you're going to hear from the same old, tired playbook, a bunch of lies, grievances and name-calling. What you're going to hear tonight is a detailed and dangerous plan called Project 2025 that the former president intends on implementing if he were elected again. I believe very strongly that the American people want a president who understands the importance of bringing us together knowing we have so much more in common than what separates us. And I pledge to you to be a president for all Americans.
DAVID MUIR: Vice President Harris, I'll let you respond.
VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS: So, Donald Trump has no plan for you. And when you look at his economic plan, it's all about tax breaks for the richest people. I am offering what I describe as an opportunity economy, and the best economists in our country, if not the world, have reviewed our relative plans for the future of America. What Goldman Sachs has said is that Donald Trump's plan would make the economy worse. Mine would strengthen the economy. What the Wharton School has said is Donald Trump's plan would actually explode the deficit. Sixteen Nobel laureates have described his economic plan as something that would increase inflation and by the middle of next year would invite a recession. You just have to look at where we are and where we stand on the issues. And I'd invite you to know that Donald Trump actually has no plan for you, because he is more interested in defending himself than he is in looking out for you.
When was she asked that in the debate? This is all I could find about a plan.
DAVID MUIR: So let's get started. I want to begin tonight with the issue voters repeatedly say is their number one issue, and that is the economy and the cost of living in this country. Vice President Harris, you and President Trump were elected four years ago and your opponent on the stage here tonight often asks his supporters, are you better off than you were four years ago? When it comes to the economy, do you believe Americans are better off than they were four years ago?
VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS: So, I was raised as a middle-class kid. And I am actually the only person on this stage who has a plan that is about lifting up the middle class and working people of America. I believe in the ambition, the aspirations, the dreams of the American people. And that is why I imagine and have actually a plan to build what I call an opportunity economy. Because here's the thing. We know that we have a shortage of homes and housing, and the cost of housing is too expensive for far too many people. We know that young families need support to raise their children. And I intend on extending a tax cut for those families of $6,000, which is the largest child tax credit that we have given in a long time. So that those young families can afford to buy a crib, buy a car seat, buy clothes for their children. My passion, one of them, is small businesses. I was actually -- my mother raised my sister and me but there was a woman who helped raise us. We call her our second mother. She was a small business owner. I love our small businesses. My plan is to give a $50,000 tax deduction to start-up small businesses, knowing they are part of the backbone of America's economy. My opponent, on the other hand, his plan is to do what he has done before, which is to provide a tax cut for billionaires and big corporations, which will result in $5 trillion to America's deficit. My opponent has a plan that I call the Trump sales tax, which would be a 20% tax on everyday goods that you rely on to get through the month. Economists have said that Trump's sales tax would actually result for middle-class families in about $4,000 more a year because of his policies and his ideas about what should be the backs of middle-class people paying for tax cuts for billionaires.
DAVID MUIR: We are going to get to immigration and border security during this debate. But I would like to let Vice President Harris respond on the economy here.
VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS: Well, I would love to. Let's talk about what Donald Trump left us. Donald Trump left us the worst unemployment since the Great Depression. Donald Trump left us the worst public health epidemic in a century. Donald Trump left us the worst attack on our democracy since the Civil War. And what we have done is clean up Donald Trump's mess. What we have done and what I intend to do is build on what we know are the aspirations and the hopes of the American people. But I'm going to tell you all, in this debate tonight, you're going to hear from the same old, tired playbook, a bunch of lies, grievances and name-calling. What you're going to hear tonight is a detailed and dangerous plan called Project 2025 that the former president intends on implementing if he were elected again. I believe very strongly that the American people want a president who understands the importance of bringing us together knowing we have so much more in common than what separates us. And I pledge to you to be a president for all Americans.
DAVID MUIR: Vice President Harris, I'll let you respond.
VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS: So, Donald Trump has no plan for you. And when you look at his economic plan, it's all about tax breaks for the richest people. I am offering what I describe as an opportunity economy, and the best economists in our country, if not the world, have reviewed our relative plans for the future of America. What Goldman Sachs has said is that Donald Trump's plan would make the economy worse. Mine would strengthen the economy. What the Wharton School has said is Donald Trump's plan would actually explode the deficit. Sixteen Nobel laureates have described his economic plan as something that would increase inflation and by the middle of next year would invite a recession. You just have to look at where we are and where we stand on the issues. And I'd invite you to know that Donald Trump actually has no plan for you, because he is more interested in defending himself than he is in looking out for you.
We had pivoted to her softball interview after the debate.
I see, any transcript on that?
The world where someone asks for specific examples of what someone would do to help the economy, and answer with growing up middle class with nice lawns. That world. At the very beginning I've pointed out this specific example at this specific interview, and you still think she answered the question.
Child Tax credits and 25k for housing will not curb inflation, interest rates, or stimulate the economy.
Apparently, you stopped watching the video immediately after her 'growing up middleclass' or you would know she answered his question.
Since you know curbing inflation, interest rates, or stimulating the economy will not stimulate the economy, what do you think will?
* BTW, the current rate of inflation is 2.5%. The lowest rate of inflation in the U.S. was 1.15% in 1928. A year later, the stock market crashed, and the Great Depression commenced and lasted until 1941. In 1942 the rate of inflation was 10.92%.
* The federal funds rate soared to 20% in December 1980. The lowest it has dropped is effectively 0% in 2008 and 2020.
* From late 1982 to mid-1990 economic growth was 4% a year. Between 1993 and 2000, the United States had the best economic performance of the past three decades. Currently the U.S. GDP is at 3.00%.
If this is legit it speaks volumes about how weak, unintelligent, and dishonest Kamala Harris and the mainstream media are. If she needs these kinds of advantages to answer questions in a debate with Trump, there is no way she will have what it takes to deal with world leaders. God help us if that woman gets elected.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GXiAOg7XUAAkpkR?format=jpg&name=large)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GXiATwPWIAAt2t0?format=jpg&name=large)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GXiAZ-DWYAEe7os?format=jpg&name=large)
Libs of TikTokWhere's the getlibs to discuss her lies and blow them out of proportion like they do with Trump? They don't want to talk about this?
@libsoftiktok
Hi
@ABC
@DavidMuir
did you see this?
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1834625570908545271
Libs of TikTokI thought that was bullshit when I first saw the debate.
@libsoftiktok
Hi
@ABC
@DavidMuir
did you see this?
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1834625570908545271
Where's the getlibs to discuss her lies and blow them out of proportion like they do with Trump? They don't want to talk about this?
Is this the whistleblower that was later killed in the mysterious car crash? :D :D :D
What is hilarious is that she stays to "stop with rhetoric" of saying she's going to take guns.
This is after she said Trump would implement Project 2025 and a federal abortion ban, after Trump has repeatedly said he won't.
Trump says a lot of things. The problem is he's lied so much, that even if he told the truth, many folks would understandably believe it is a lie.
Does Trump have a selective memory or is he senile and honestly cannot remember what he says?
Trump has claimed to know “nothing” about the conservative road map for a second term, but some of his top former advisers are heavily involved with it, including Russ Vought.
"I know nothing about Project 2025," he said in a Truth Social post Friday June 5th. "I have no idea who is behind it.”
'Vought, one of the key authors of Project 2025. He is also the Republican National Committee’s platform policy director.'
Vought has spent years churning out plans for a second Trump administration. Now he's helping drafting the GOP's 2024 platform — and could be White House chief ..'
Trump spoke highly about the group's plans at a dinner sponsored by the Heritage Foundation in April 2022, saying: “This is a great group, and they’re going to lay the groundwork and detail plans for exactly what our movement will do and what your movement will do when the American people give us a colossal mandate to save America.”
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/project-2025-trump-heritage-foundation-what-know-rcna161338
Why does this sound more and more exactly like the type of rabbit hole retarded Qoach would fall for? :D :D :D
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=ABC+Finally+Addresses+MAGA+%E2%80%98Affidavit%E2%80%99+Claiming+It+Helped+Harris+Win+Debate.
What is hilarious is that she stays to "stop with rhetoric" of saying she's going to take guns.It's typical for them, the hypocrisy, to avoid the glaring faults with their candidates. It's one of the things dems do well, stick together no matter how idiotic the subject.
This is after she said Trump would implement Project 2025 and a federal abortion ban, after Trump has repeatedly said he won't.
He has repeatedly denied ever having any plans to implement project 2025. He's even said it was written by fringe elements and completely denounced it.
He said the same about the federal abortion ban.
Kamala has said the opposite on so many things - fracking, gun buyback, etc that she has no right to lecture anyone about accusing her of something she says she won't do. Her own words contradict her.
Trump has never endorsed 2025 or the Federal abortion ban.
But it is amazing how subjective folks are with Trump - they take him literally at face value without context when it suits them (bloodbath, won't have to vote anymore), but then say he doesn't mean what he says when it doesn't.
Politicians lie. They tell folks what they want to hear. I have posted/said this multiple times. Both candidates are presently attempting to moderate what they originally championed in order to broaden their support. If you want to believe what Trump only recently claims about project 2025, go for it.
VP Harris was at least honest enough to admit that once she knew more about fracking, she realized it would not be a good thing to do. On the other hand, Trump first supported and then claimed not to know what Project 2025 was or who was involved in it.
BTW, do you know what year it was that VP Harris opposed fracking? I believe it was when she was a senator which had to be at least four years ago. Trump was 'in bed' with the project 2025 folks earlier this year, about 6 months ago.
Harris has not been honest about fracking. She wanted to ban fracking for years. Now she claims that she vowed not to ban fracking during her debate in 2020. She lied. All she said in 2020 was that Joe Biden would not ban fracking. She is a liar. And not just about fracking.
Politicians lie. They tell folks what they want to hear. I have posted/said this multiple times. Both candidates are presently attempting to moderate what they originally championed in order to broaden their support. If you want to believe what Trump only recently claims about project 2025, go for it.
VP Harris was at least honest enough to admit that once she knew more about fracking, she realized it would not be a good thing to do. On the other hand, Trump first supported and then claimed not to know what Project 2025 was or who was involved in it.
BTW, do you know what year it was that VP Harris opposed fracking? I believe it was when she was a senator which had to be at least four years ago. Trump was 'in bed' with the project 2025 folks earlier this year, about 6 months ago.
Payne told Schoen that Harris' insistence her values haven't changed even as her stance on fracking has evolved felt like a "wink and a nod to the core crew."
"Just help me get over the hump and I got your back," he said, imitating Harris. "How do you see it playing out?"
Schoen agreed with Payne.
"I think that's a fair statement. I think it also means, 'Whatever I say, don't take seriously because whatever I say, my values are your values, so what I say today and what I say tomorrow doesn't really matter.' It's artful politics and frankly gives her the freedom to say and do anything she needs to do to get elected, which in the short term might be helpful, in the long term, I dare say is disastrous."
He pointed to Pennsylvania polling averages from Real Clear Politics showing Harris and former President Donald Trump in a dead heat at 47.7% and 47.2%, respectively. Schoen called those numbers the "key to the election."
"Whomever wins Pennsylvania is very likely to be the next president," he said. "It's effectively a tie, and if she is perceived to be against fracking, which was her stated position in 2019, it could cost her western Pennsylvania and ultimately the state and the presidency."
Yada, yada, yada, politicians lie.
Did you watch the 2020 debate? Did she or did she not vow not to ban fracking then? Seems she kind of hedged her bet at that debate when it seems Harris didn’t actually say she changed her own position on the issue—instead she said then-Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden “will not end fracking.” Wouldn't you suppose she would have to change her position on fracking when she became Vice President?
The point I made is that in June of this year, Trump supported Project 2025, less than 6 months later he says he knows nothing about Project 2025. Like Harris he could have said he once supported it until he learned out more about it now, he feels differently. People, even politicians change their minds which is fine. Pretending you never heard of something and know nothing about it different when you obviously do, is quite a leap from simply changing one's mind about something.
Why isn't the media all over this? The reason this is so important is she has to win PA to win the election and fracking is a huge industry in PA.
Megyn Kelly Brings Receipts on Kamala Harris' Lies About Her Fracking Position During CNN Interview[/youtube]
Politicians lie. They tell folks what they want to hear. I have posted/said this multiple times. Both candidates are presently attempting to moderate what they originally championed in order to broaden their support. If you want to believe what Trump only recently claims about project 2025, go for it.Politicians lie but only republicans get called out for it by MSM "fact checkers."
VP Harris was at least honest enough to admit that once she knew more about fracking, she realized it would not be a good thing to do. On the other hand, Trump first supported and then claimed not to know what Project 2025 was or who was involved in it.
BTW, do you know what year it was that VP Harris opposed fracking? I believe it was when she was a senator which had to be at least four years ago. Trump was 'in bed' with the project 2025 folks earlier this year, about 6 months ago.
Which article are you citing?
And ABC issuing a blanket denial does not debunk anything.
ABC doesn't have to debunk anything. :D The onus is on the one making the claims to have some sort of proof behind. Issuing a redacted "affidavit" that is later proved to contain source material, car crash claims and laughable excuses as follow up doesn't prove anything either. Maybe Black Insurrectionist should have created such a rabbit hole for the mouth breathers to tumble into.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=How+the+Debate+Whistleblower+Car+Crash+Conspiracy+Went+Viral
---
Two days after the debate, Black Insurrectionist claimed to have access to an affidavit from an ABC News whistleblower, outlining the ways in which Harris was given an upper hand.
“I have just signed a non-disclosure agreement with the attorney of the whistleblower,” he wrote. “The affidavit states how the Harris campaign was given sample question [sic] which were essentially the same questions that were given during the debate and separate assurances of fact checking Donald Trump and that she would NOT be fact checked.” He added that he would release the affidavit after the attorney redacted the whistleblower’s name.
A few days later, he did so, producing a clumsily redacted, typo-filled, strangely-formatted document, dated September 9. The affidavit claimed that Harris was promised she wouldn’t be questioned about the health of Joe Biden or her tenure as “Attorney General in San Francisco”—a position that doesn’t exist.
When people pointed out a range of such shortcomings, Black Insurrectionist took to feuding with those arguing the document appears to be obviously fake. After claiming that the document was sent to Republican Speaker of the House Mike Johnson in unredacted form, he signaled a retreat. “I have gone as far with it as I can,” he tweeted on Monday morning. “The rest is up to the whistleblower and Congress.”
As word of the supposed affidavit picked up steam, so too did a tale about the untimely death of the person purportedly behind it. On Sunday, Rep. Taylor Greene tweeted, “The ABC whistleblower who claimed Kamala Harris was given debate questions ahead of the debate has died in a car crash according to news reports.”
---
The affidavit, sent before the debate, is proof.
What are you quoting? You are posting a link that has numerous stories.
The affidavit is FAKE. There is no proof.
Why do you think the anonymous person behind it suddenly "died in a car crash"?
You have no idea if the affidavit is "fake." It could be fake. It could be authentic. It should be investigated.
What source are you citing?
He has never once said he would do it. He has said the opposite every time.There are videos of Trump showing his support for project 2025. He changed his tune when this became a political liability, and he needed to gain support from more moderate Republicans. People, including Trump change their positions for a variety of reasons.
It's telling that you say all politicians lie, and subjectively not believe Trump, but believe Harris changed her position because "she learned more"....She changed her tune because the left needs to win PA. Even the liberal pundits know that.
If it were real, then why does no one know where it was filed? Not to mention the very fact the misspellings are a tip off and the notary seal/stamp that they claim is on there, really isn't. (NY you can use either a seal or stamp). Have you ever heard of a notary not using a seal/stamp? Of course, Mike Johnson was claimed to be someone who was mailed a copy. But he won't confirm it. (As of yet.)
You can read any source and get the gist of it.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=ABC+responds+to+viral+%27whistleblower+affidavit%27+claiming+Kamala+Harris+received+debate+help
The highlight of the entire debate was watching the debate audience go crazy for Trumpy. He said "They went crazy".
Except there was no debate audience. Cognitive tests anyone? I remember red hats crying for one just a couple months ago. :D :D
---
Trump claims audience ‘went crazy’ for him at his debate with Harris – but there was no audience
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Donald+Trump%27s+Debate+Crowd+Comment+Sparks+Confusion%3A+%27They+Went+Crazy%27
Donald Trump has been roasted for claiming that the audience at the presidential debate with Kamala Harris “went crazy” for him – despite the fact that there was no live audience present.
The former president often claims his crowd sizes are huge – even wildly asserting he drew in a bigger crowd than Martin Luther King Jr during the March on Washington – but this time, he appeared to go even further by claiming there was one at all.
---
There are videos of Trump showing his support for project 2025. He changed his tune when this became a political liability, and he needed to gain support from more moderate Republicans. People, including Trump change their positions for a variety of reasons.
If by chance Trump wins the election, I guess we will find out whether there will be a 'project 2025.' I take it that you think Gabbard who was a Democrat in 2020, an Independent in 2022, and indorsed Trump in a 'moment' ago. RFK was a Democratic Presidential candidate until it was obvious in October 2023 that he would not become the Democratic nominee, so he changed his mind, an instead ran as an Independent, only to endorse Trump when he said, "In my heart, I no longer believe that I have a realistic path to electoral victory." Elon Musk decided to vote vote for Republican for the first time in 2022. Prior to this his political leanings were all over the place. Hmmm, people change their minds for a number of reasons.
In 2020 four years ago, she’d backtracked. As vice president, Harris even voted to increase leases for fracking as part of the Inflation Reduction Act. Are you saying she knew four years ago that she needed to win Pennsylvania? She knew four years ago she would be the Democratic Presidential nominee. Heck not only is she smart, she apparently is also psychic.
The affidavit is FAKE. There is no proof.
Why do you think the anonymous person behind it suddenly "died in a car crash"?
Did this fool really say the affidavit is fake? lol
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE:
🚨🚨🚨🚨
The ABC Whistleblower who claimed ABC News gave @KamalaHarris the Presidential debate questions ahead of the Presidential debate has exclusively given me a copy of the official complaint they filed with the SEC today.
See screenshots of the submissions below: 👇🏻
As of today, The Securities and Exchange Commissioner (SEC) has acknowledged receipt of two complaints lodged against @Disney , the owner of ABC News @ABC. The complaint, seen below, states that ABC News and their Parent company Disney colluded with the @KamalaHarris Presidential Campaign to influence the Presidential debate on 9-10-24 and to further influence the outcome of the 2024 Presidential Election.
@DavidMuir @LinseyDavis
The Complaint shows documents uploaded to the official SEC complaint system and a screenshot of the uploaded file that the Whistleblower claims contains evidence of this collusion.
Below are the documents that were exclusively provided to me today.
🚨Submission Number: 17268-694-586-914 was submitted successfully on Friday, September 20, 2024 at 08:55:41 AM EDT
🚨Submission Number: 17268-178-298-389 was submitted successfully on Friday, September 20, 2024 at 10:16:25 AM EDT
The Whistleblower complaint that was submitted to the SEC today reads:
“I have heard and observed conversations and have evidence in hand of ABC News, a wholly owned subsidiary of Disney Media Networks, which is a division of The Walt Disney Company, collusion between ABC news and the Kamala Harris campaign for the Presidency of the United States. It is my belief from the context of the conversations, that ABC news in the debate held on September 10, 2024, and at other various times before and after this debate to influence the Presidential election. I would like to emphatically state, that I am not a Donald Trump supporter and have never voted for Donald Trump. The context of the conversations heard and among other observations is that ABC News is working with the Kamala Harris campaign, and that Disney may exact monetary or other future considerations if they aid in the election of Kamala Harris. I have sat idly by for years and watched the media on both sides of the political spectrum become nothing more than campaign ads for politicians. It is clear that there are multiple considerations being exchanged in this current Presidential campaign. I have enclosed further evidence for your consideration. Please note, this evidence contains personal information of mine and I wish for it to remain undisclosed for safety considerations for my family.”
🚨This was the brief statement on the complaint which was partially cut off in submission photo🚨
Here are the screenshots of the Whistleblower’s official complaint to the SEC today regarding their alleged claims of having evidence that @ABC News gave @KamalaHarris’s campaign the questions for the Presidential debate against Donald Trump ahead of the debate.
ABC News and Disney must issue a statement immediately.
https://x.com/lauraloomer/status/1837206001675592155?s=46
Hang in there, maybe one day you can be Trumps friend.
The lovely Laura Loomer
Mr Trumps newest looniest best friend
Madge Taylor Greene will not be happy
there is a long queue to be his friend and judging by the above mentioned ladies his present friends have to fight hard for his favorKeep up the hard work, I'm sure he'll take notice soon.
The lovely Laura Loomer
Mr Trumps newest looniest best friend
Madge Taylor Greene will not be happy
Harris offers debate on CNN.How many interviews has Kuntmala done with Fox?
Very brave.
How many interviews has Kuntmala done with Fox?
I saw a clip on Maher of some MSNBC woman saying Kamala doesn't need to share he policies in detail because she's not running to be the "Commander in Perfect", just needs to be enough to beat Trump.Once again, they don't care about her policies, they just want to beat Trump. When will they care about the future of America?
So, denying the public access to her is just fine.
She can't handle an interview with Fox, but she'll be just fine with leaders of foreign countries for sure.
Once again, they don't care about her policies, they just want to beat Trump. When will they care about the future of America?
How many interviews has Kuntmala done with Fox?
Sounds conspiracy nutty, but the more I think about it, it DOES feel like they picked the worst candidate they could, after Biden was deemed unelectable and broke the model, to see how far they can push their agenda.
She is pretty much awful at everything, has an awful record, etc.....nothing redeeming. A poor speaker, poor off the cuff, poor performance as VP, poor performance as a presidential candidate in their primaries.....etc
Who cares? Fox has nothing to do with Trumpy being scared of another one.You should care when the person you're voting for is a coward and can't face tough questions. How's Kuntmala going to sit in front of world leaders and cackle like a bimbo whore and expect to be respected?
You should be happy then. Instant win fro El Lardo it would seem.
You should care when the person you're voting for is a coward and can't face tough questions. How's Kuntmala going to sit in front of world leaders and cackle like a bimbo whore and expect to be respected?Maybe she'll blow the world leaders to influence them.
You should care when the person you're voting for is a coward and can't face tough questions. How's Kuntmala going to sit in front of world leaders and cackle like a bimbo whore and expect to be respected?
A lot better than an old man lying and crying about people eating pets, buildings not having windows, and "concepts" of a plan.So nothing positive to say about your Kuntfaced candidate? Just more whining about Trump?
700 former military and national security officials endorse Harris. How many endorse the orange turd? Remind us again. And just to head off your predictablereplywhine :
700 former military and national security officials opinion > your TDfS tear filled opinion.
---
More than 700 former military and national security officials endorse Harris, say Trump is ‘impulsive and ill-informed’
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=More+than+700+former+military+and+national+security+officials+endorse+Harris%2C+say+Trump+is+%E2%80%98impulsive+and+ill-informed%E2%80%99
* In an open letter released by National Security Leaders for America, 741 bipartisan former national security officials endorsed Harris for president, calling Trump “impulsive and ill-informed.”
* The statement was signed by former secretaries of State Hillary Clinton and John Kerry, as well as Republican secretaries of Defense Chuck Hagel and William Cohen.
*The letter criticized the former president’s foreign affairs track record and alleged involvement in the Jan. 6th Capitol riot.
More than 700 former national security and military officials endorsed Kamala Harris for president over Donald Trump in the 2024 election in an open letter published Sunday by National Security Leaders for America.
“This election is a choice between serious leadership and vengeful impulsiveness,” said the group, which is made up of bipartisan senior leaders who served in the military and other offices and agencies.
“We are trained to make sober, rational decisions. That is how we know Vice President Harris would make an excellent Commander-in-Chief, while Mr. Trump has proven he is not up to the job,” they added.
The statement, which criticized Trump as “impulsive and ill-informed,” was signed by 741 people, including vocal Harris-supporting Democrats like Hillary Clinton and John Kerry, as well as Republican secretaries of Defense Chuck Hagel and William Cohen. Hagel and Cohen both served under Democratic presidents.
The signatories include 15 retired four-star generals, 12 former Cabinet-level officials, eight service secretaries, more than 120 ambassadors and three Trump-era officials: Retired U.S. Army Gen. Peter Chiarelli, former Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff retired four-star Gen. Paul Selva and retired Maj. Gen. Eric Thorne Olson.
---
So nothing positive to say about your Kuntfaced candidate? Just more whining about Trump?
Obviously, reading isn't a skill you have mastered.
I think saying 700+ former military and national security officials endorse Harris is pretty damn positive. ::)
El Orange-O scared shitless of a second debate.
Harris offers another debate in October and Trumpy runs away. :D :D :D :D
His campaign team isn't going to let her wipe the floor with him again a second time.
Sounds conspiracy nutty, but the more I think about it, it DOES feel like they picked the worst candidate they could, after Biden was deemed unelectable and broke the model, to see how far they can push their agenda.
She is pretty much awful at everything, has an awful record, etc.....nothing redeeming. A poor speaker, poor off the cuff, poor performance as VP, poor performance as a presidential candidate in their primaries.....etc
If we took your opinion as fact, she is completely horrible at speaking, off the cuff, etc. Can you explain how she was able to completely kick "I'm the best President you've ever seen" Trumps butt all over that stage? And he won't debate her again?
She didn’t. Otherwise she wouldn’t have immediately asked for debate RIGHT after the last one. And prove it even further, the next day during an unadvertised interview with an ABC affiliate in Philadelphia she couldn’t answer a question without looking like an ass. NOT ONLY THAT….she received NO post debate bump in the polls…..but Trump sure did. Have another drink.
You drank the Kool aid so long ago.. it's sad reading your posts. She DID get a bump. Just not on Gateway Pundit. Trump did not. She asked for another debate immediately because it was clear she can choke The Donald out easily
Go back and look at my post junior
I can just take so much Qanon BS in one day.. I'm pacing myself. Basically, I'm surprised the other Trumpsters let you sit at the adult table with your pundit Breitbart nonsense. I suspect it is because they figure it can't hurt since you are pro trump and integrity is not a big thing among Trumpsters. I mean... they support Trump. Called POW's losers, cheated on how many wives, lies almost every time he speaks. But he is rich and white so there is that....
If you’re referring to McCain, he wasn’t a loser. He was a traitor who will be more remembered for his MAJOR roll in the fake dossier and the attempt to overthrow a sitting president which overshadows his service to this country. Let’s talk about cheating for a minute. Biden and his now wife were cheating her husband during their marriage. As for Harris….you’re voting for a literal side chick
He scared? is that what it is? hahahahahahahahahaha
She didn’t. Otherwise she wouldn’t have immediately asked for debate RIGHT after the last one. And to prove it even further, the next day during an unadvertised interview with an ABC affiliate in Philadelphia she couldn’t answer a question without looking like an ass. NOT ONLY THAT….she received NO post debate bump in the polls…..but Trump sure did. Have another drink.
I just love when you make my points for me
Trump said he won't debate her again even if it's on Newsmax.
It's almost like he has no idea what he's saying. :D
He's supposed to be affirming his own bullshit and yet only proving the other person right with each follow up. Seriously, I have seen used dental floss that possesses greater IQ than this little manlet.
Coach is truly an 8th grade level thinker at least with politics. No doubt any survivor series with Coach as a player, he would be "that guy" that does the leaders bidding without thinking... never the leader.
Coach is truly an 8th grade level thinker at least with politics. No doubt any survivor series with Coach as a player, he would be "that guy" that does the leaders bidding without thinking... never the leader.
Once again with the personal insults.
Because he and Lurker are in their own little circle jerk and that's all they have.
No. Because we are not insulting your retarded ass. We are describing you.
Don't blame me because you clowns get your ass handed to you every time you open your mouths on here not just by me, but by everyone
Don't blame me because you clowns get your ass handed to you every time you open your mouths on here not just by me, but by everyone
Someone 'getting their ass handed to them' is a matter of perception. Of course, you think you are handing them their ass because you are biased toward yourself. Nobody expects you to think otherwise. Your ability to reflect on yourself honestly is severely compromised and has been for quite a while.
Once again with the personal insults.
Here's another personal insult.. (It's ironic the \snowflake people are butthurt)
I KNOW you are sharp. No doubt. But in the history of Getbig I can't recall a single time you called Coach out for his posts that are obviously fictional. Not one... single.. time. Where is your integrity. Because you by omission, agree with every post Coach posted then you are not the intellectual I thought you were. If you don't agree with his posts, where is your comments?
Here's another personal insult.. (It's ironic the \snowflake people are butthurt)Same amount of times you call lurker out for his obvious lies and propaganda posts. Or lurker calls you out for your drunken cheerleader posts.
I KNOW you are sharp. No doubt. But in the history of Getbig I can't recall a single time you called Coach out for his posts that are obviously fictional. Not one... single.. time. Where is your integrity. Because you by omission, agree with every post Coach posted then you are not the intellectual I thought you were. If you don't agree with his posts, where is your comments?
Same amount of times you call lurker out for his obvious lies and propaganda posts. Or lurker calls you out for your drunken cheerleader posts.
Why don't you link us to an example of my "obviouse lies and propaganda posts"? Can you? This should be an interesting reply too. Or not as I am sure no link will be forthcoming. :'(Pick one and claim it, like you do with my defense of Trumps posts, weirdo. ::)
Just because you can't refute it or like the reality of it, doesn't make it false. :D :D :D
Here's another personal insult.. (It's ironic the \snowflake people are butthurt)
I KNOW you are sharp. No doubt. But in the history of Getbig I can't recall a single time you called Coach out for his posts that are obviously fictional. Not one... single.. time. Where is your integrity. Because you by omission, agree with every post Coach posted then you are not the intellectual I thought you were. If you don't agree with his posts, where is your comments?
Pick one and claim it, like you do with my defense of Trumps posts, weirdo. ::)
Why don't you link us to an example of my "obviouse lies and propaganda posts"? Can you? This should be an interesting reply too. Or not as I am sure no link will be forthcoming. :'(
Just because you can't refute it or like the reality of it, doesn't make it false. :D :D :D
Pick one and claim it, like you do with my defense of Trumps posts, weirdo. ::)
Watch it Chaos, he might call you some names... LOL
::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
epic phagg kid-cokk loving Lib...
Tim Walz is telling people he’s just as nervous about facing JD Vance as he was the Sunday afternoon in August when he warned Kamala Harris in his running mate interview that he was a bad debater.
This also plays out in day-to-day engagement: a governor who until six weeks ago was one of the most eagerly accessible Democratic politicians in the country and who essentially manifested himself as the running mate with a few spicy TV appearances has done only a few interviews since being picked, all lower profile. He doesn’t take questions from reporters and rarely comes to chat off the record on his campaign plane. Aides declined requests for even a brief interview with CNN.
“He’s a strong person,” said Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar, who’s known Walz since they were each first elected to Washington in 2006. “He’s just not a lawyer-debater type. It’s not like he was dreaming of debates when he was in first grade.”
Walz is confident in Harris’ vision. But the governor fears he won’t make his case as well as he needs to, according to people who have been speaking with him.
Already coming with the excuses and setting the bar low for the VP debate.
Already coming with the excuses and setting the bar low for the VP debate.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/28/politics/tim-walz-vice-president-debate/index.html
As for Vance, I haven't seen much of him, probably more polished for TV than Walz but still don't trust him. Punchable face for sure so like Ted Cruz he started wearing a beard to look less punchable.
Watch it Chaos, he might call you some names... LOLAll he has to do is read his own post history to see the propaganda and lies but he's too infected with TDS to see it, he's a lost cause. One of the weak and feeble that looks to the government to tell him how to live his life. Pathetic, weak, useless human being.
::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
epic phagg kid-cokk loving Lib...
All he has to do is read his own post history to see the propaganda and lies but he's too infected with TDS to see it, he's a lost cause. One of the weak and feeble that looks to the government to tell him how to live his life. Pathetic, weak, useless human being.
Translation : you couldn't find any "lies or propaganda" to contribute to me.
So easy to predict someone that has nothing but whining and tv static to post.
Not sure about Vance looking 'punchable' but Cruz continues to look like an idiot regardless whether he has a beard or not.
For something that should be so easy to prove, if it actually existed, you sure haven't provided any proof yet. Just empty replies. Empty. Like the calories that sit on that 50" waist.Just look at your post history, weirdo.
Both very punchable. Probably why he now wears a beard, like Ted Cruz.Easily both punchable.
(https://preview.redd.it/jd-vance-beardless-v0-bqpl4vwozxgd1.png?auto=webp&s=1347a051fcccb459417ece61718fb0120cb4e54a) (https://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod/images/gettyimages-462419780-1544632681.jpg)
Just look at your post history, weirdo.
Easily both punchable.
Still not a single link or a shred of "proof". As always.
some things never change
Walz is apparently a bad debater and terrified to debate Vance.
Sounds vaguely familiar….on here.
You mean like El Lardo is scared to debate Harris again?
Naw, Walz isn't scared of a man wearing makeup who hates himself so much he keeps reinventing himself.
He's like you and Agnostic but I digress. Trump has done three debates and it wouldn't make sense to do another since voting has already started. Again, she immediately asked for another debate after the last one because she knew she got beat.
He immediately declined because she kicked his ass.
And no, Vance is more like you. Making up lies and false stories that result in him (and you) getting his ass kicked. Unlike you, though, Vance at least admits his stories are fake.
Whatever helps you sleep better
Walz is apparently a bad debater and terrified to debate Vance.
Sounds vaguely familiar….on here.
Kamala won the debate, whether it changes a vote remains to be seen but it didn't hurt the democrats. The VP debate... a draw. Didn't hurt either party. Wish Vance had the ball to address the 2020 election but it's almost the norm that it's expected Trumpsters won't answer that. Cost him points as he clearly painted himself a Trump lap dog, but for the Republicans, that is not a bad thingA draw? Vance mopped the floor with Tampon Tim and everyone knows it which is why the MSM immediately changed the narrative the next day with those "January 6th" revelations.
A draw? Vance mopped the floor with Tampon Tim and everyone knows it which is why the MSM immediately changed the narrative the next day with those "January 6th" revelations.
A draw? Vance mopped the floor with Tampon Tim and everyone knows it which is why the MSM immediately changed the narrative the next day with those "January 6th" revelations.
Kamala won the debate, whether it changes a vote remains to be seen but it didn't hurt the democrats. The VP debate... a draw. Didn't hurt either party. Wish Vance had the ball to address the 2020 election but it's almost the norm that it's expected Trumpsters won't answer that. Cost him points as he clearly painted himself a Trump lap dog, but for the Republicans, that is not a bad thingDumb fucktard!
Still not a single link or a shred of "proof". As always.The proof is your post history, weirdo. ::)
The proof is your post history, weirdo. ::)
Then it should be easy for you to supply an example. Why haven't you? Other than you can't.
Kamala won the debate, whether it changes a vote remains to be seen but it didn't hurt the democrats. The VP debate... a draw. Didn't hurt either party. Wish Vance had the ball to address the 2020 election but it's almost the norm that it's expected Trumpsters won't answer that. Cost him points as he clearly painted himself a Trump lap dog, but for the Republicans, that is not a bad thing
.
He's like you and Agnostic but I digress. Trump has done three debates and it wouldn't make sense to do another since voting has already started. Again, she immediately asked for another debate after the last one because she knew she got beat.
Dude, Trump didn’t win the debate. All she had to do was play prevent defense, he came unglued and was on his heels. It doesn’t matter how much you side with him and his policies, he didn’t win.
To the folks saying the VP debate was a draw, quit lying to yourselves. Vance won that.
Dude, Trump didn’t win the debate. All she had to do was play prevent defense, he came unglued and was on his heels. It doesn’t matter how much you side with him and his policies, he didn’t win.
To the folks saying the VP debate was a draw, quit lying to yourselves. Vance won that.
Tim Walz came off as unpolished, but oddly, that was a good counter to Vance's smooth presentation because it underscored Walz as a genuine, regular guy and not a slick politician
You must have watched another debate. Because the dude stood there and questioned whether the moderators were going to let him lie or not. Couldn't answer a simple question about the 2020 election. Dodged and swerved most of the others. Tim wasn't awesome, but that debate was a draw.
Posts like this, and the ones calling people having legitimate discussion “trumptards” because they don’t agree with you is why you are either full on trolling or just as bad as others on this board. BBC is left leaning and even they called it in favor of Vance. Waltz had a few good retorts, and for the most part it was actually very civilized (reminded me of the first Romney Obama debate, it was cordial) but overall Vance won. Th only thing to hang onto was his non answer on the 2020 election. Other than that, they cut him off when he defended, and rightfully so, his position because they were incorrect in n how they moderated some of those questions. As in, they lied. Whether it was intentional or just them being poorly educated on all issues, they still were wrong.
Tim started slow but got better at the end. Vance started out smooth but lost it halfway through by questioning if the mods were fact checking him. Then failing to answer a simple direct question. Avoiding his prior claims. And trying to still heap the troubles on migrants, migrants, migrants.
Shouting over women and having his mic wasn't a positive note.
How you continue to use logic and common sense with the weirdo is beyond me. He's so far extreme left he is incapable of rational conversations.
Might want to get your TRT checked to see if it's real - You're one degree away from using the term mansplaining.
Dude, Trump didn’t win the debate. All she had to do was play prevent defense, he came unglued and was on his heels. It doesn’t matter how much you side with him and his policies, he didn’t win.
To the folks saying the VP debate was a draw, quit lying to yourselves. Vance won that.
You and I have different opinions why he won or lost. I said in another post that Trump lost on performance but won on substance. She had no substance and skated on policy and couldn’t answer questions. If I’m judging a debate I want to hear substance, how will this affect ME especially since I have businesses one with 70+ employees.
But like Grape said, he did miss some opportunities but not enough for him to lose on the SUBSTANCE of the debate. The moderators only fact checked him and even they got called out for being wrong on their “fact checks” which, IMO, made him winning even more conclusive.
Now, if you want to compare how JD Vance and Tim Walz debated. Both Trump and Harris could take a lesson on how to debate and how it should be conducted. I enjoyed that debate. Both conducted themselves in a civil manor.
Might want to get your TRT checked to see if it's real - You're one degree away from using the term mansplaining.
How you continue to use logic and common sense with the weirdo is beyond me. He's so far extreme left he is incapable of rational conversations.
Says the weirdo who can never comment on the actual topic of any thread or posts within.Watching your interactions with the more reasonable getbiggers has convinced me that you are too far gone to be conversed with, weirdo.
Well that would require him to view as manly. Eye liner, pink tie, he probably has his Sephoria points maxed out.
Watching your interactions with the more reasonable getbiggers has convinced me that you are too far gone to be conversed with, weirdo.
Says the guy who frequents Bangkok..
Trump lost. No question. Anyone at this point claiming Trump won is giving away their ridiculous bias. Coach... no offense. We love you, hope you're doing ok but seriously, your posts carry no weight, even among the Trumpsters
The Vance Waltz debate. Not so clear. If I was watching the debate without any background I would say tie. Hell, even maybe Vance edged out Waltz on smoothness.
But given I am aware of Vance's previous stances and statements... I give a slight edge to Waltz.
1. Vance at one point compared Trump to Hitler. He had to swallow that. Waltz did not have a similar situation
2. Vance asked point blank if Trump lost the election, he demonstrated he was a Trump lap dog and would not have the fortitude that even Pence demonstrated sticking to the constitution against Trumps insistence he trash it.
But overall it was refreshingly cordial, and a breath of fresh air. Both guys are probably decent, but the evidence shows Vance was willing to eat crow to get on the ticket. Not a good look for me.
Trump lost. No question.
Trump lost. No question. Anyone at this point claiming Trump won is giving away their ridiculous bias. Coach... no offense. We love you, hope you're doing ok but seriously, your posts carry no weight, even among the Trumpsters🖕🤡
The Vance Waltz debate. Not so clear. If I was watching the debate without any background I would say tie. Hell, even maybe Vance edged out Waltz on smoothness.
But given I am aware of Vance's previous stances and statements... I give a slight edge to Waltz.
1. Vance at one point compared Trump to Hitler. He had to swallow that. Waltz did not have a similar situation
2. Vance asked point blank if Trump lost the election, he demonstrated he was a Trump lap dog and would not have the fortitude that even Pence demonstrated sticking to the constitution against Trumps insistence he trash it.
But overall it was refreshingly cordial, and a breath of fresh air. Both guys are probably decent, but the evidence shows Vance was willing to eat crow to get on the ticket. Not a good look for me.
Trump lost. No question. Anyone at this point claiming Trump won is giving away their ridiculous bias. Coach... no offense. We love you, hope you're doing ok but seriously, your posts carry no weight, even among the Trumpsters
The Vance Waltz debate. Not so clear. If I was watching the debate without any background I would say tie. Hell, even maybe Vance edged out Waltz on smoothness.
But given I am aware of Vance's previous stances and statements... I give a slight edge to Waltz.
1. Vance at one point compared Trump to Hitler. He had to swallow that. Waltz did not have a similar situation
2. Vance asked point blank if Trump lost the election, he demonstrated he was a Trump lap dog and would not have the fortitude that even Pence demonstrated sticking to the constitution against Trumps insistence he trash it.
But overall it was refreshingly cordial, and a breath of fresh air. Both guys are probably decent, but the evidence shows Vance was willing to eat crow to get on the ticket. Not a good look for me.
Looks like the debate whistleblower might have been fake. And now this. I don't trust anything this account is putting out at this point.
ABC ‘whistleblower’ hoaxster returns with sloppy attempt to frame Tim Walz
The allegations quickly began to crumble after people noticed very obvious issues.
Mikael Thalen
Updated on October 15 2024
https://www.dailydot.com/debug/far-right-account-fabricates-tim-walz-child-allegations/
Did not need a fake whistleblower report to show how biased the abc debate moderators were.Most of the stories on the leftist media use "anonymous sources" to report wild stories and accusations.
Wouldn't also be surprised if the story was generated by the left, to make the dopiest maga types from fall for it, and further discredit.
There are professional troll farms that constantly do this shit.
Most of the stories on the leftist media use "anonymous sources" to report wild stories and accusations.