She was supposed to say what they all say... "I want world-wide peace and hope to work with children and animals some day. I see myself as an ambassador of peace." How hard was that? She could easily have said, "I hope we live in harmony one day, although we all have differing opinions." Too many big words, and she got flustered with the opposite thing.
If the question had been about the Iraqi occupation, and she had 5 brothers who died there, her answer should/would have been, "my brothers died so world peace could happen." Not, "our family believes in killing all the f**kers who killed mine."
It's about the children, and the animals. 
It's good for her she did have an opinion, as she will now be bought up by the fundies (even though this flagrantly vanity thing is bad in God's eyes) and will make lots of money on the tour. Everybody wins, really.
Maybe it’s just my old ears, but has anyone notice the somewhat deafening SILENCE of all these alleged “women’s rights” groups, regarding Hilton’s tirade on Ms. Prejean?
On Hannity, there was a lady, a college professor, acting as part of Hannity’s “Great American Panel”, along with a conservative commentator and former American Gladiator, Dan “Nitro” Clark.
When the question was asked about Hilton’s less-than-savory comments, she kept flipping the script about how pageants objectify women and teach little girls that their only (or primary) worth is their bodies.
While some will agree with her on that point, the fact that she kept dodging the issue about the "women's rights" groups' lockjaw (although she clearly lashed at Hilton for his remarks) appears to be part and parcel with what the conservative commentator mentioned. It appears that evangelical and conservative women are fair game for disparaging, sexist, and disgusting remarks.
