At their bests, both Ronnie and Yates are huge (ronnie around 250, Dorian at 257 at the 93 O. (his best shape -pre-tear).
However, that is where the comparison ends.
Dorian does not have the muscle shape nor the body taper that Ronnie had (recall that back in the day ronnie had an exaggerated X-frame by virtue of his tiny waist).
That is why I have always felt that Ronnie would have a huge advantage.
This comparison illustrates the difference that shape alone can make:


both men are huge and ripped, but only one has the muscle shape to go with it.
Disclaimer: this is not intended to start yet another Ronnie vs. Dorian thread! It is merely a summation of the main argument that I have always felt that gives one man an advantage over the other.