Why Yates won is more obvious on video, pics don't fully convey the unusual density. Density and calves he had over Ron, that's about it.
Other than that, he had:
-OK arm size at best - kid-like compared to Ron. So-so size along with average cuts and mediocre refinement.
-Waist n' hips too big, lacks taper in comparison.
-Decent overall size, nothing special
The crab shot is embarassing, given Yates' striking lack of volume and detail in comparison with Ron. Yates also has larger joints = less sweep.
Remind me again how he beat Dillet even once, other than politics and the fact he's white?
Debating the obvious becomes boring.