None of us can imagine our posting photos and personal details on the net let alone Getbig. You sound like DJ181. Always boasting about yourself and accomplishments or excuses for not doing so well.
Vince BASILE, Mr. Canada 1970 - some of us post under pseudonyms, some of us post under our real name. Obviously I am doing the latter, and that is fine. I am - although not lately - sort of behind the scenes in the bodybuilding industry a little, as I had travelled to many expos, and of course my real name and information is out there, as well as family photos - not a ridiculous amount of them, but there are perhaps a dozen photos of my children available online. Do you think that is strange? Do you not realize that we have a social network called "Facebook", where virtually everyone does exactly this? This isn't 1970, Vince. People post photos of their family all the time. As I said, I probably have around a dozen photos of my children available on my Facebook page. So no, I find nothing strange about posting such photos online, or even on Getbig.
I am not making fun of your borderline autism. I mention it because that helps some of us to comprehend why on earth you go on and on in this thread. We get the facts you post but only you go
beyond them and start making ridiculous claims, etc.
Yes you did, Vince. And that makes me look at you in a fundamentally different way - a way that I never had before in the 13+ years of reading your posts, and admiring your physique at your prime. At no point did I understand why some felt the need to rip into you. At no point did I ever participate in such vitriol, and while I never defended you that I am aware of, I certainly never attacked you, nor understood why you were being attacked. Now I am starting to get it.
My autism - which to be fair is very, very borderline; definite but borderline - should help you to understand why I have no concern whatsoever about participating in politically incorrect topics. It does not concern me in the slightest bit if something is "unpopular". When Charles Darwin formulated the theory of evolution, it was extremely unpopular. He explicitly stated that his work was not for his generation, but rather - for future generations. Had I been alive at the time, I would have fully subscribed to evolution, and I would have done so at a massive expense to my personal/social life, most likely including my financial life unless I was a tenured university professor, who have the most employment security, literally in the world. As I said, I am not concerned about what is "racist" or "sexist", but rather - what is correct. That is the ONLY thing that concerns me, and autism is 100% the explanation as to why that is the case for me. So yes, my autism should help you to understand why I do not have a "filter". That said, I do hope you acknowledge that I do not use racial epithets, I do not personally attack others nor their family members, and I consistently write at the level of an intelligent university graduate student. Those are my goals, and I have objectively achieved those goals. Not without exception - but
mostly without exception.
My posts are waaaay too long though.
Haha, seriously though - they are way too long, and I would like to do something about that. It's the one major thing that I would like to change, but alas - that is also autism-driven, and it's just...really hard for me not to make such long posts.
I have no idea why you think I am making ridiculous claim though. You are seemingly upset that I post such large posts, yet part of the reason why they are so long is because I verify my claims. As I have said, my claims are objectively verifiable. You even found a photo of me graduating from university in 2005 - that took place publicly at the community auditorium, so certainly you believe me when I stated to you that I have two university degrees, and two minor degrees...right?
You posted that your university let you go. But you have no clue at all why they did that. Anyone reading this thread would know you would be an embarrassment to the university with your views and logic.
Vince, understand that I am not referencing your age to disparage you in any way, but how is it possible that a man of your age - or indeed any person over the age of 40 with work experience - could be unaware that you cannot be fired from a job for being an "embarrassment". Do you realize that by your logic, a person with a tattoo could be considered an embarrassment because people associate tattoos with gang violence. One could easily argue that members of other races are an embarrassment. Where I live, our Aborigine [First Nations] population commits the overwhelming majority of violence, almost all directed internally [on a consistent annual basis, 80% of our homicides in Thunder Bay are perpetrated by First Nations offenders, and virtually all of these murders are Aborigine-on-Aborigine homicides].
I know you consider this post to be an embarrassment, because virtually all generations prior to the internet have been brainwashed to believe that diversity is a strength and that anyone discussing racial matters rationally simply MUST be wrong and simply MUST be evil. Yet you have done literally nothing to establish that you can refute any fact that I have presented, and the disparity in our debating ability would be even more apparent if you and I debated on video. It would be completely clear that you can present literally nothing to rebut anything that I have stated.
Of course you already know this. So you call me an "embarrassment" because in your mind I shouldn't even be addressed. It simply goes without saying that I
must be wrong. The very concept of debating me is an insult on your sensibilities.
Ah, but Vine - if it's so easy to debate me, then DO IT. Do it now! Don't just imply that what I am saying is so obviously and completely false - show everyone. I think the more you ponder this demand from me, the more you will realize that you do not have the means to debate me, because the means do not exist. This may well make you think about the world in a way that you never have before. It's literally taken for granted that White people are the root of all evil, and that every problem in the world is caused by them, to the point that if you even suggest anything other than that, you will be attacked - by other White people no less - for the "crime" of simply defending your own race.
Like it or not, being an "embarrassment" for stating facts is not grounds to fire someone. The university knows this, hence the reason why they systematically withheld all information relating to the complaints against me. I was the top student in the entire mathematics department while I was working as a Teaching Assistant, and I marked over 1,000 calculus assignments without a single error being found. I taught a highly multi-racial class, and not one single complaint of racial animosity or alleged racism came about - not one. Not only was I not determined to have engaged in racist behaviour, literally no complaint emerged. My professor was a Turkish woman who gave me an express written recommendation to assist her with Calculus II the following semester. She did not make one single claim of either racist or sexist behaviour towards her. Her family was also Muslim, and at no point did she claim that I made negative comments regarding the religion of her family.
So how do you think that I was an "embarrassment" to the university? Because I thought critically on controversial subjects? I suppose according to you, it's "sexist" to point out that the gender wage gap is a fraction of what it is claimed to be, and that study after study shows that? Vince, maybe you should make yourself aware of the fact that people are entitled to have differences of opinion - especially when all available facts show that I am correct. Do you really think that you can fire a person simply for making a post on their social media that offended someone? Using your logic, anyone can be fired at any time, and all that the employer has to do is say "One of his posts offended me." Say your cat died, and someone was posting photos of him with his cat, enjoying spending time together. A person can say "The photos brought up sad memories, and as a result, I was offended", and then use that as a basis to fire someone. That's not how it works, Vince. Nothing I did was contrary to the contract I signed with the university, and even if it was thought to be, there is a procedure that must be followed to make a positive determination of that. Nothing of the sort took place. If you followed the recent case at another Canadian university, Laurier, you would see just how much of a joke that university's administration was made to be when they attempted to punish a female student for simply having a diversity of views. Check out these two videos, to see just how much of a joke Canadian universities have become. Now THIS is an embarrassment...but I'm sure you just love it.
Since you have a disability it prevents you from normal interactions where you sense what others are concerned about. Nope, you forge ahead with your views and agenda and consider yourself the undisputed
champion of debates on Getbig. Oh, dear, this isn't the forum for issues that concern you.
How about we have a pinch grip contest to settle our differences? I will give you a 10 kg start!
This is correct in certain ways - yes, indeed having autism does prevent me from "normal" interactions where I sense that other people are concerned about. But here's the thing, Vince - I'm not wrong. And as I said earlier in this thread, we are at a point where parties that were considered "Neo-Nazi" parties as recently in history as 2009 are now getting 25-48% of the vote - even higher if you look only at the White vote. For example, Austria would have a "Neo-Nazi" party [Freedom Party of Austria] if you looked solely at the White vote.
Vince, what that means is that we are at a point where literally over 50% of White people are voting for alleged "racist" candidates, because they see multiculturalism and diversity as an existential threat. After WWII, it became clear that it would be impossible to defeat White nations through warfare. That is when the biggest campaign of psychological warfare against White people began. And if current trends continue uninterrupted, White people will be the minority in almost every country they are currently the majority in by 2050 [Whites are already the global minority, but soon White people will be the minority not only globally, but in the countries that they built and are currently the majority in]. If trends continue from there, Whites will be extinct, or on the verge of extinction as a race by 2150.
Now Vince, tell me - do you REALLY think that given such a dire outlook, that White people will allow themselves to continue to be demographically displaced by way of mass third world immigration? Do you REALLY think that White people will continue to allow their own universities to teach White students that they are the sum of all evil, as we dwindle into minority status? Do you REALLY think that White people will continue to pay for the social infrastructure that allows non-Whites to out-breed us, while continuing to teach those racial groups that everything wrong in their lives are caused by evil White people? Do you REALLY think that White people are going to tolerate being fired for simply having an opinion relating to their own biological displacement, or relating to policies that blame White people for all the problems in the world? I know that like most "tolerant" liberals, you live in a majority White area, far away from the non-Whites that you claim to be so tolerant of - but I can assure you, as Australia continues to get flooded with successive waves of mass immigrants, they will react exactly the same as the USA has, and as France has, and as Sweden has, etc. Just wait for it. Incidentally Vince, have you even bothered to read comments online about diversity and immigration, or "White Privilege"? Perhaps you should start watching some of these videos on YouTube and reading the comments. You would realize that White people by and large, are sick of this. You can only blame a race of people for so long before they finally get fed up. That is already happening with White people, and the only comments, in addition to voting patterns, speak for themselves. A good example is here:
http://www.chroniclejournal.com/news/local/too-many-little-white-lies/article_4c92492a-11b4-11e6-98f7-0b46500f7b48.htmlLastly, with all of this being said, I would REALLY like to post shorter posts, LOL. Honestly, it is one thing that I really want to do, yet feel that I can't do.
I would be interested in doing an online video debate with you on this topic, with several specific points being addressed, which you would be made aware of in advance. I think you would look quite foolish if you debated me online, and it may be a humbling experience for you. I don't doubt that you have a good pinch grip. I think perhaps the difference between you and I is that I know where I am strong, and where I am weak. Unfortunately for you and most people, they do not know where they are weak. I can assure you, I am strong in debating. I did beat Matt Cimone in a pairs debate in high school, merely months before he went on to win the Senior High School Debate Nationals. So if we use the logic that I beat the man who beat the man...then you could argue that I was at the top of the Canadian national level at debating.
Lastly, I have no idea why you would doubt any of my claims. They are all publicly verifiable.
If you need me to provide you with evidence of the awards that I won, I would be happy to do so, Vince.
