Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3486254 times)

IceCold · « **Reply #18050 on:** December 27, 2006, 04:07:42 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on December 27, 2006, 11:56:32 AM

the judges don't care about the greek ideal - to pull an ND: show me where in the judging criteria it says anything about the "greek ideal"

if your calves are bigger than your arms, then your arms are too small..

i agree about your comment regarding the greek ideal.

about the calves.

most guys dont have huge calves. so like dorian, when your calves are among the biggest of any bber of all time, then it would be a big deal to have arms that match.

Hulkster · « **Reply #18051 on:** December 27, 2006, 04:52:22 PM »

Quote

the only real problem with Yates is his upper separation , other than that his quads at his best are fantastic , period

other than that?

upper separation is probably THE most important thing with quadriceps.

It delineates the 4 muscle groups and makes the quads look fantastic:

just compare shawn and porter's great quads to dorian's blobs:

Hulkster · « **Reply #18052 on:** December 27, 2006, 04:55:32 PM »

Quote

and his legs blow Ronnie's out of the water in terms of proportion & balance , so stick to that ridiculous claim you internet-fan-boy

too bad balance and proportion don't mean a thing when your quads look horrible...

more fancy words that ND hopes will somehow overcome reality...

pobrecito · « **Reply #18053 on:** December 27, 2006, 04:57:31 PM »

Dorian is flat out beating Coleman in those pictures you posted Hulkster. Dorian is bigger and more muscular, and he does not have toothpick calves. Coleman looks retarded with no calves, like a fucking bowling pin.

Hulkster · « **Reply #18054 on:** December 27, 2006, 05:03:33 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on August 19, 2006, 03:01:35 PM

I've seen the light .. this IS the best ever..

hahahahahaha

Hulkster · « **Reply #18055 on:** December 27, 2006, 05:04:21 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on August 19, 2006, 03:00:47 PM

look at that quad...the arms

hahahahahaha

pobrecito · « **Reply #18056 on:** December 27, 2006, 05:04:23 PM »

Yates a 93/95 version VS. Coleman 99:

-Dorian is more muscular: FACT
-Symmetry round could go either way, but Coleman would have to win it just to have a shot.

Yates has the upper hand.

Hulkster · « **Reply #18057 on:** December 27, 2006, 05:05:06 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on August 19, 2006, 02:57:28 PM

Perfect most-muscular

hahahahahaha

pobrecito · « **Reply #18058 on:** December 27, 2006, 05:07:49 PM »

Hulkster is getting desperate now....

Yates already has 1/2 of the judging criteria locked up, and that is irrefutable. Coleman is at a disadvantage right off the bat.

Hulkster · « **Reply #18059 on:** December 27, 2006, 05:09:29 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on November 05, 2006, 09:00:45 PM

oh my god. Ok, I am officially a believer in 99 Coleman. This is unreal.

hahaha and we still do not know what pic was trying to be shown..

Hulkster · « **Reply #18060 on:** December 27, 2006, 05:11:16 PM »

99 ronnie vs 93 dorian pic comparison (not screencap):

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #18061 on:** December 27, 2006, 05:12:58 PM »

Its all about balance

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #18062 on:** December 27, 2006, 05:14:55 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on December 27, 2006, 05:11:16 PM

99 ronnie vs 93 dorian pic comparison (not screencap):

Different lighting , Dorian 1995 vs Ronnie 1999

pobrecito · « **Reply #18063 on:** December 27, 2006, 05:15:10 PM »

Coleman's chest is absolutely non-existant in this shot....looks like it's sunken into his ribcage $:-\$

pobrecito · « **Reply #18064 on:** December 27, 2006, 05:16:59 PM »

Coleman looks tiny in this shot. Even Shawn Ray is looks the same size. Dorian flat out beats Coleman in muscularity.

Hulkster · « **Reply #18065 on:** December 27, 2006, 05:19:36 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on December 27, 2006, 05:16:59 PM

Coleman looks tiny in this shot. Even Shawn Ray is looks the same size. Dorian flat out beats Coleman in muscularity.

ronnie looks tiny? his arm looks about the same size as shawn's quad...

oh, and besides, you have stated MANY times on this thread that you, like me and many others, believe that ronnie 99 was probably the best ever onstage, flaws and all...

pobrecito · « **Reply #18066 on:** December 27, 2006, 05:21:57 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on December 27, 2006, 05:19:36 PM

ronnie looks tiny? his arm looks about the same size as shawn's quad...

oh, and besides, you have stated MANY times on this thread that you, like me and many others, believe that ronnie 99 was probably the best ever onstage, flaws and all...

I think Yates in 95 was better overall, as I had not yet seen the 1995 prejudging video. Yates truly massacred the field. His condition was superior to 93. I mean look at his back, the veins

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #18067 on:** December 27, 2006, 05:32:44 PM »

Hulkster · « **Reply #18068 on:** December 27, 2006, 05:36:52 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on December 27, 2006, 05:21:57 PM

I think Yates in 95 was better overall, as I had not yet seen the 1995 prejudging video. Yates truly massacred the field. His condition was superior to 93. I mean look at his back, the veins

but look at shawn's back that year:

fantastic!

Shawn probably should have placed higher in 95 at least based on the shots I have seen of him. He was fantastic at that show.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #18069 on:** December 27, 2006, 05:41:37 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on December 27, 2006, 05:36:52 PM

but look at shawn's back that year:

fantastic!

Shawn probably should have placed higher in 95 at least based on the shots I have seen of him. He was fantastic at that show.

LMFAO look at his back , great detail & separation and thats it , Dorian has the best back the sport has ever seen , Shawn's is really NOT comparable , look at Shawn's monster imbalance and his high calves , and look at his 200 pounds of size compared to Dorian's 255 pounds ! Shawn has a lightweights back no width and NO thickness like Yates.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #18070 on:** December 27, 2006, 05:46:36 PM »

Take Shawn's big arms out of the pic so you can focus on what he has for a back , again great detail & separation , but he can't match Dorian for anything else.

Hulkster · « **Reply #18071 on:** December 27, 2006, 05:48:00 PM »

the longer this thread goes, and the more pics and videos are posted, the more and more ND's posts are becoming like suckmyasshole's:

wordy, but devoid of any link to reality.

shawn is fantastic in that rear double bi.

no one sees all the crap about the monster imbalances in it that you do...

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #18072 on:** December 27, 2006, 05:55:57 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on December 27, 2006, 05:48:00 PM

the longer this thread goes, and the more pics and videos are posted, the more and more ND's posts are becoming like suckmyasshole's:

wordy, but devoid of any link to reality.

shawn is fantastic in that rear double bi.

no one sees all the crap about the monster imbalances in it that you do...

No the longer this thread goes on , you go to greater and greater lengths to deny the obvious , Shawn does have an excellent back double biceps pose no question about it , however he still has balance issues and his back is in NO WAY comparable to Dorians other than detail & muscle separation , Shawn does have a narrow back , his thickness even relative isn't anywhere near Dorian , his calves are high , he has heavyweights biceps/triceps and middleweights delts , but Shawn did very well despite his flaws for a reason , he beat guys with much thicker and wider backs , like Dillett & Nasser because he had more detail & separation but he could never beat Yates in the rear double biceps shot , Ronnie might but Shawn

pobrecito · « **Reply #18073 on:** December 27, 2006, 06:02:43 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on December 27, 2006, 05:36:52 PM

but look at shawn's back that year:

fantastic!

Shawn probably should have placed higher in 95 at least based on the shots I have seen of him. He was fantastic at that show.

Shawn got 4th in 95, but even he admitted on his 96BFTO talk that Yates was the clear winner, but he also claimed he should have been 2nd

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #18074 on:** December 27, 2006, 06:06:32 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on December 27, 2006, 06:02:43 PM

Shawn got 4th in 95, but even he admitted on his 96BFTO talk that Yates was the clear winner, but he also claimed he should have been 2nd

Nasser said Yates was the clear winner in 1995 anyone would be high to argue otherwise ! Yates vindicated himself in grand fashion after 1994 , much like Ronnie 2003 from 2002 .