ok, calves are bit soso, but the legs and ass make up for it all the way 
full hetero 
It is so interesting that it is common on this board for people (men) posting bodybuilding related assessments and observations about other men to use a sexual qualifier. In this case "full hetero" and often the term "no homo" as if that clears them of any innuendo of possibly being gay. Why does it not go without saying that when someone who is interested in the technicalities of bodybuilding, usually for comparative personal reasons, is not posting a homosexual come-on?
Personally, it seems more "homo" than "hetero" to think others would take the posts anything more than it is on face value. Do gay men generally converse about other men's calf, quad and glute development in such a manner?