Wow, so many super-genius savants congregating in this thread.
For what it's worth, here are the tests I've taken. 1,2,6 were school related, 3-5 were part of a test study I participated in during university for the training of school psychologists, 7-8 were for MENSA (with its low bar to entry

), 9-10 were for grad school.
1. SB (LM)
2. WISC
3. WAIS
4. House, Tree, Person Test
5. Ravens Progressive Matrices
6. SAT (first at 12, then at 17)*
7. CTMM
8. Wonderlic
9. GRE
10. LSAT
Modesty prohibits me from revealing my scores (like it matters

).
But here's the thing extraordinary accomplishments, lucrative awards, grants, and fellowships, publications in respected journals and books (or its equivalent in other fields), hyper-competitive post-docs and appointments, and professional recognition from the inner sanctum of super achievers all beat stating a mere IQ score (big whoop). Moreover, my experience working alongside creative and multi-talented individuals with an average, by my estimates, of 140FSIQ and obscene cultural capital, super-high IQers don't generally talk about their scores; instead, such individuals "perform" their intelligence and talents. Also, my understanding is that SATs and ACTs only correlate to about .6 or so with IQ (they are only supposed to predict first year grades at university, and are not stand-ins for professionally administered IQ test, which are very complex and test a broad range of cognitive abilities; c.f., I dont think MENSA accepts SATs and ACTs scores which were taken post-1994).